Sex Roles

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect

  • Robert M. Kaplan


Two experiments were performed to replicate and extend previous findings of judgmental bias which favors physically attractive people. In the first experiment male and female subjects judged an essay purportedly written by an attractive or an unattractive female author. The attractive author was rated as significantly more talented by male judges. Female judges rated the attractive author as less talented, although this difference was not statistically significant. A second experiment concerned ratings by males and females of essays written by attractive or unattractive male authors. The results suggested that the attractiveness halo effect does not occur for male authors.


Social Psychology Female Subject Halo Effect Experiment Male Female Author 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Beauty and the best. Psychology Today, 1972, 5, 42–46.Google Scholar
  2. Burne, D., London, O., & Reeves, K. The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 1968, 36, 259–271.Google Scholar
  3. Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. The effects of physical attractiveness on teacher expectation. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.Google Scholar
  4. Dermer, M., & Thiel, D. L. When beauty may fail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 1168–1176.Google Scholar
  5. Dion, K. Physical attractiveness and the evaluation of children's transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 207–213.Google Scholar
  6. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
  7. Dipbaze, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wilback, K. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in the evaluation of applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975, 60, 39–43.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, R. M., & Goldman, R. D. Interracial perception among Black, White, and Mexican-American high school students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 383–389.Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan, R. M., & Litrownik, A. J. Some statistical procedures for the assessment of multiple outcome criteria in behavioral research. Behavior Therapy, 1977, 8, 383–392.Google Scholar
  10. Krebs, D., & Adinolfi, A. A. Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 245–253.Google Scholar
  11. Landy, D., & Sigall, H. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 29, 299–304.Google Scholar
  12. Rao, R. Advanced statistical methods in biometric research. New York: Wiley, 1952.Google Scholar
  13. Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 410–414.Google Scholar
  14. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. The importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 508–516.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Diego State UniversitySan Diego

Personalised recommendations