Abstract
Five experiments were conducted to investigate the relationship between infant sex and adults' perceptions of infant physical attractiveness. College students rated the cuteness and/or sex of male and female infants at each of six age levels: 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 months. The results indicated that (a) subjects had little difficulty assigning a sex label to infants, although in some instances the assigned label was incorrect; (b) older infants received higher cuteness ratings than younger infants; (c) cuter infants were more likely to be perceived as female than male; (d) Labeled Males received higher cuteness ratings than Labeled Females, although this effect was stronger for Perceived Males than for Perceived Females; and (e) perceived cuteness influenced perceived sex. Results are interpreted as generally supporting the existence of a sex stereotype related to physical attractiveness.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bar-Tal, D., & Saxe, L. Physical attractiveness and its relationship to sex-role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 123–133.Google Scholar
- Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
- Clifford, M. M., & Walster, E. The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of Education, 1973, 46, 248–258.Google Scholar
- Condry, J., & Condry, S. Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development, 1976, 47, 812–819.Google Scholar
- Corter, C., Trehub, S., Boukydis, C., Ford, L., Celhoffer, L., & Minde, K. Nurses' judgments of the attractiveness of premature infants. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, 1976.Google Scholar
- Cross, J. F., & Cross, J. Age, sex, race and the perception of facial beauty. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 433–439.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K. Physical attractiveness and evaluations of children's transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 207–213.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K. Young children's stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Development Psychology, 1973, 9, 183–188.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K. Children's physical attractiveness and sex as determinants of adult punitiveness. Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 772–778.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K. The incentive value of physical attractiveness for young children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977, 3, 67–70.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K., & Berscheid, E. Physical attractiveness and peer perception among children. Sociometry, 1974, 37, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, K. A., & Fitzgerald, H. E. Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, 1977. (a)Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, K. A., & Fitzgerald, H. E. Facial feature determinants of perceived infant cuteness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May 1977. (b)Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, K. A., & Fitzgerald, H. E. Gender bias in observers' perceptions of infants' sex: “It's a boy most of the time.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 45, 472–474. (c)Google Scholar
- Lorenz, K. Die angeborenen Formen moglicher Erfahrung. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, 1943, 5, 245–409.Google Scholar
- Miller, A. G. Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 1970, 19, 241–243.Google Scholar
- Rubin, J. S., Provenzano, F., & Luria, Z. The eye of the beholder: Parents' views on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1974, 44, 512–519.Google Scholar
- Salvia, J., Sheare, J. B., & Algozzine, B. Facial attractiveness and personal-social development. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1975, 3, 171–178.Google Scholar