Sex Roles

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 135–148 | Cite as

Stereotypes of woman: A single category?

  • A. Kay Clifton
  • Diane McGrath
  • Bonnie Wick


The literature on prejudice toward women is reviewed and placed within an attitude-theory conceptualization. Research evidence is presented which questions the assumption of high consensuality about a single category of stereotypes of women. Unexpected results from exploratory research, intended to supplement adjective choices for the replication of traditional research on stereotypes of women, led to a reformulation of the study of stereotypes. Rather than eliciting adjectives descriptive of woman, the researchers elicited adjectives descriptive of five categories of women: housewife, bunny, clubwoman, career woman and woman athlete. Previous family theory, as well as pretesting among college students and adults in a middle-class neighborhood, generated the five categories. Undergraduate students (N=190) were then asked to separately select adjectives descriptive of each of the five categories of women; adjectives were considered stereotypical if more than 50% of the respondents check them. The results were used to question the assumption of a single category; no adjective was attributed to all five categories by both men and women. There is strong evidence for distinctive stereotypes of housewife and bunny, and, furthermore, these two traditional role alternatives for women are not perceived as complementary by the majority of respondents. A third stereotyped image of woman, a masculinized stereotype, included women's role alternatives that maintain relative independence from men.


College Student Strong Evidence Social Psychology Undergraduate Student Research Evidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anthony, S. B., The status of woman, past, present and future. In F. C. Griffin (ed.) Woman as revolutionary. New York: Mentor, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. The measurement of psychological androgeny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(2), 155–162.Google Scholar
  3. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S., Sex-role stereotypes: a current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28(2), 59–78.Google Scholar
  4. Bullough, V. L., & Bullough, B. The subordinate sex. Baltimore, Maryland: Penguin Books, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
  5. Clifton, A. K., & Fiorenzo, B. Is the affective component of prejudice toward women pervasive and highly consensual? Paper presented at the Illinois Sociological Association Meetings, Macomb, Illinois, October, 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Ehrlich, H. J. The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrlich, H. J. & Rinehart, J. W. A brief report on the methodology of stereotype research. Social Forces, 1965, 43, 564–575.Google Scholar
  8. Ellis, A. The folklore of sex. New York: Grove, 1961.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, A. The American sexual tragedy (2nd ed. rev.). New York: Lyle Stuart, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Empey, L. T. Role expectations of young women regarding marriage and a career. Marriage and Family Living, 1958, 20, 152–155.Google Scholar
  11. Figes, E. Patriarchal attitudes. Greenwich, Connecticut: Stein and Day, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Fishbein, M. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  13. Fernberger, W. Persistence of stereotypes concerning sex differences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1948, 43, 97–101.Google Scholar
  14. Friedan, B. The feminine mystique. New York: Dell, 1963.Google Scholar
  15. Gross, L. A hypothesis of feminine types in relation to family adjustment. Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1950, 20, 373–381.Google Scholar
  16. Gross, F. Work and society. New York: Crowell, 1958.Google Scholar
  17. Haavio-Mannila, E. Sex differentiation in role expectations and performance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1967, 29(3), 568–578.Google Scholar
  18. Hays, H. R. The dangerous sex. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1972.Google Scholar
  19. Kirkpatrick, C. The construction of a belief-pattern scale for measuring attitudes toward feminism. Journal of Social Psychology, 1936, 7, 421–437. (a)Google Scholar
  20. Kirkpatrick, C. Content of a scale for measuring attitudes toward feminism. Sociology and Social Research, 1936 20, 512–526. (b)Google Scholar
  21. Kirpatrick, C. The changing status of women, The family as process and institution. New York: The Ronald Press. 1954.Google Scholar
  22. Kluckhohn, F. R. American women and American values. In L. Bryson (Ed.). Facing future risks. New York: Harper, 1953.Google Scholar
  23. Komarovsky, M. Cultural contradictions and sex roles. American Journal of Sociology, 1946, 52, 184–189.Google Scholar
  24. Lipman-Blumen, J. How ideology shapes women's lives. Scientific American, 1972, 226, 24–34.Google Scholar
  25. Lunneborg, P. W. Stereotypic aspects in masculinity—feminity measurement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 113–118.Google Scholar
  26. McKee, P., & Sherriffs, A. C. The differential evaluation of males and females. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 356–371.Google Scholar
  27. McKee, P., & Sherriffs, A. C. Men's and women's beliefs, ideals, and self-concepts. American Journal of Sociology, 1959, 64, 356–363.Google Scholar
  28. Motz, A. B. The role conception inventory: A tool for research in social psychology. American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 465–471.Google Scholar
  29. Nadler, E., & Morrow, W. Authoritarian attitudes toward women and their correlates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1959, 50, 113–123.Google Scholar
  30. Parsons, T. Essays in sociological theory. New York: Free Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. Sex role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32(3), 287–295.Google Scholar
  32. Sherriffs, A. C., & Jarrett, R. F. Sex differences in attitudes about sex differences. Journal of Psychology, 1953, 35, 161–168.Google Scholar
  33. Sherriffs, A. C., & McKee, P. Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 451–464.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, R. H. Family interaction. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. Turnipseed, D. Playboy's stereotype of the American woamn, Undergraduate research paper, Illinois State University, 1973.Google Scholar
  36. Wallin, P. Cultural contradictions and sex roles: A repeat study. American Sociological Review, 1959, 15, 288–293.Google Scholar
  37. Zelditch, M., Jr. Role differentiation in the nuclear family: A comparative study. In T. Parsons and R. Bales (Eds.), Family: Socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Kay Clifton
    • 1
  • Diane McGrath
    • 1
  • Bonnie Wick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology-Anthropology, College of Arts and SciencesIllinois State UniversityBloomington-Normal

Personalised recommendations