Marine Geophysical Researches

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 129–151 | Cite as

The Tamayo transform fault in the mouth of the Gulf of California

  • K. A. Kastens
  • K. C. Macdonald
  • K. Becker
  • K. Crane


The Tamayo transform fault is located at the north end of the East Pacific Rise where it enters the Gulf of California. This paper presents bathymetric, seismic reflection, magnetic, and gravity data from a detailed survey of the transform fault. The dominant feature of the offset region is a bathymetric ridge trending 120°, parallel to the predicted transform plate boundary. This transform ridge is associated with a large (600 γ) positive magnetic anomaly, and a very small positive free-air gravity anomaly. Magnetic and gravity models indicate either a basalt or serpentinite composition for the ridge, but cannot distinguish between these possibilities. At its eastern end, the modern zone of strike-slip motion is in a narrow valley south of the transform ridge. The transform plate margin appears to pass through a saddle in the transform ridge and meet the western spreading center segment in the trough north of the transform ridge. On the basis of this survey and previous work, the history of the Tamayo from continental breakup to the present has been reconstructed. Initial rifting occurred along a trend of 130° at approximately 3.5 m.y.b.p. Once the transform fault was free of the constraints imposed by continent-continent and continent-oceanic lithospheric interaction, the trend of the transform fault rotated counter-clockwise. This rotation resulted in a ‘leaky’ transform fault and intrusion of a large continuous transform ridge. Further adjustments in the spreading center/transform fault plate boundary configuration have given rise to an incipient zone of rifting cutting across the transform ridge and emplacement of diapiric structures.


Magnetic Anomaly Plate Boundary Seismic Reflection Spreading Center Continental Breakup 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atwater, T.: 1970, ‘Implications of Plate Tectonics for the Cenozoic Evolution of Western N. America’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 3513–3536.Google Scholar
  2. Blake, M. C., Campbell, R. H., Dibblee, T. W., Howell, D. G., Nilsen, T. H., Normark, W. R., Vedder, J. C., and Silver, E. A.: 1978, ‘Neogene Basin Formation in Relation to Plate Tectonic Evolution of San Andreas Fault System, California’, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 62, 344–372.Google Scholar
  3. Bonatti, E.: 1976, ‘Serpentinite Protrusions into the Oceanic Crust’, Earth Planet. Sci. Letts. 32, 107–113.Google Scholar
  4. Bonatti, E.: 1977, ‘Vertical Tectonism in Oceanic Fracture Zones’, Earch Planet. Sci. Letts. 37, 369–379.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, G. G., Menard, H. W., Larson, R. L., Sharman, G. F. and Smith, S. M.: 1970, ‘History of Seafloor Spreading West of Baja, California’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 491–498.Google Scholar
  6. Coleman, R. G.: 1971, ‘Petrologic and Geophysical Nature of Serpentinites’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 82, 897–918.Google Scholar
  7. Collette, B.: 1974, ‘Thermal Contraction Joints in a Spreading Seafloor as Origin of Fracture Zones’, Nature 251, 299–300.Google Scholar
  8. Crouch, J. K.: 1978, ‘Neogene Tectonic Evolution of the California Continental Borderland and Western Transverse Ranges’, U.S.G.S. Open File Report 78-606.Google Scholar
  9. Curray, J., Moore, D. G., et al.: 1979, ‘Deep Sea Drilling Project in the Gulf of California, Leg 64’, Geotimes, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Cyamex Scientific Team: 1978, ‘First Submersible Study of the East Pacific Rise: RITA (Rivera-Tamayo) Project 21°N’, (abst.) Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, EOS, 59, 1198.Google Scholar
  11. Eittreim, S. and Ewing, J.: 1975, ‘Vema Fracture Zone Transform Fault’, Geology 3, 555–558.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, R. L., Rusnak, G. A. and Shepard, F. P.: 1964, ‘Chart 1’, Marine Geology of the Gulf of California, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir, 3.Google Scholar
  13. Jensky, W. A.: 1979, ‘Reconnaissance Geology and Geochronology of the Bahia de Banderas Area, Nayarit and Jalisco, Mexico’, Unpubl. Masters Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  14. Karig, D. E. and Jensky, W. A.: 1972, ‘The Proto-Gulf of California’, Earth Planet. Sci. Letts. 17, 169–174.Google Scholar
  15. Lancelot, I., and Embley, R. W.: 1977, ‘Piercement Structures in Deep Oceans’, Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. 61, 1991–2000.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, R. L.: 1970, ‘Near-bottom Studies of the East Pacific Rise Crest and Tectonics of the Mouth of the Gulf of California’, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., San Diego.Google Scholar
  17. Larson, R. L.: 1972, ‘Bathymetry, Magnetic Anomalies and Plate Tectonic History of the Mouth of the Gulf of California’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 83, 3345–3360.Google Scholar
  18. Le Pichon, X., and Hayes, D. E.: 1971, ‘Marginal Offsets, Fracture Zones and the Early Opening of the South Atlantic’, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 6294–6308.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, B., McClain, J., Snydsman, W. E., Lister, C. R. B., Holmes, M. L., and Heitman, C.: 1976, ‘Gulf of California IPOD Site Survey: Final Report’, unpubl. ms.Google Scholar
  20. Lowrie, W.: 1974, ‘Oceanic Basalt Magnetic Properties and the Vine and Matthews Hypothesis’, Zeitschr. Geophysik 40, 513–536.Google Scholar
  21. Macdonald, K. C., Kastens, K. A., Spiess, F. N., and Miller, S. P.: 1979, Deep-tow Survey of the Tamayo Transform Fault’, Marine Geophys. Res. 4, 37–70.Google Scholar
  22. Mammerickx, J.: 1979, ‘Late Cenozoic Reorganization of Spreading between the Tamayo and the Rivera Fracture Zone’, in prep.Google Scholar
  23. Matthews, D. H.: 1966, ‘The Owens Fracture Zone and the Northern End of the Carlsbad Ridge’, Phil. Tran. Roy. Soc. Lond. 259, 150–171.Google Scholar
  24. Matthews, D. J.: 1939, ‘Tables of Velocity of Sound in Pure Water and Sea Water for use in Echo Sounding and Sound-Ranging’, H.D. 282, London, Hydrographic Dept., Admiralty.Google Scholar
  25. Menard, H. W., and Atwater, T.: 1969, ‘Origin of Fracture Zone Topography’, Nature 222, 1037–1040.Google Scholar
  26. Minster, J. B., and Jordan, T. H.: 1978, ‘Present Day Plate Motion’, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 5331–5354.Google Scholar
  27. Minster, J. B., Jordan, T. H., Molnar, P., and Haines, E.: 1974, ‘Numerical modelling of instantaneous plate tectonics’, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 36, 541–576.Google Scholar
  28. Molnar, P.: 1973, ‘Fault Plane solutions of earthquakes and direction of motion in the Gulf of California and on the Rivera Fracture Zone’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 73, 1651–1658.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, D. G.: 1973, ‘Plate Edge Deformation and Crustal Growth, Gulf of California Structural Province’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 84, 1883–1906.Google Scholar
  30. Normark, W. R., and Curray, J. R.: 1968, ‘Geology and Structure of the Tip of Baja California, Mexico’, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 79, 1589–1600.Google Scholar
  31. Olivet, J.-L., Le Pichon, X., Monti, S., and Sichler, B.: 1974, ‘Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone’, J. Geophys. Res. 79, 2059–2072.Google Scholar
  32. Sharman, G., Reichle, M., and Brune, J.: 1976, ‘A Detailed Study of Relative Plate Motion in the Gulf of California’, Geology 4, 206–210.Google Scholar
  33. Sleep, N. H., and Biehler, S.: 1970, ‘Topography and Tectonics at the Intersections of Fracture Zones with Central Rifts’, J. Geophys. Res. 75, 2748–2752.Google Scholar
  34. Saad, A. H.: 1969, ‘Magnetic Properties of Ultramafic Rocks Taken from Red Mountain, California’, Geophys. 41, 673–699.Google Scholar
  35. Talwani, M., Worzel, J. L., and Landisman, M.: 1959, ‘Rapid Gravity Computation for two-dimensional Bodies with Application to the Mendocino Submarine Fracture Zone’, J. Geophys. Res. 64, 49–59.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, G., and Melson, W. G.: 1972, ‘The Petrology of Oceanic Crust across Fracture Zones in the Atlantic Ocean; Evidence of a New Kind of Seafloor Spreading’, J. Geol. 80, 526–538.Google Scholar
  37. Turcotte, D. L.: 1974, ‘Are Transform Faults Thermal Contraction Cracks?’ J. Geophys. Res. 79, 2573–2577.Google Scholar
  38. van Andel, Tj. H., Von Herzen, R. P., and Phillips, J. D.: 1971, ‘The Vema Fracture Zone and the Tectonics of Transverse Shear Zones in Oceanic Crustal Plates’, Mar. Geophys. Res. 79, 2573–2577.Google Scholar
  39. Vogt, P. R., and Johnson, G. L.: 1975, ‘Transform Faults and Longitudinal Flow below the Midocean Ridge’, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 1399–1428.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. A. Kastens
    • 1
  • K. C. Macdonald
    • 1
  • K. Becker
    • 1
  • K. Crane
    • 2
  1. 1.Marine Physical Laboratory of the Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstituteWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations