Chromosoma

, Volume 81, Issue 4, pp 507–518 | Cite as

Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements

I. Cytogenetic observations on a tandem duplication
  • P. A. Poorman
  • M. J. Moses
  • L. B. Russell
  • N. L. A. Cacheiro
Article

Abstract

Electron microscopy of surface-spread spermatocytes from mice heterozygous for a tandem duplication shows the heteromorphic synaptonemal complex (SC) to comprise two lateral elements of unequal length, the longer of which is buckled out in a characteristic loop, representing the unsynapsed portion of the duplication. The loop is a regular feature of late zygotene-early pachytene nuclei; it is longest at these early stages, but, through equalization of the two axes as a consequence of synaptic adjustment, it is replaced by a normal appearing SC at late pachytene. Because equalization, as indicated by a decrease in the percent difference between axes, may begin shortly after completion of synapsis, estimates of duplication segment length are restricted to a sample selected for least adjustment. — Although the mean position of the loop is constant at various pachytene substages, individual positions vary widely from cell to cell, consistent with the behavior expected of a duplication, but not of a deletion or an inversion. The length of the segment that is duplicated is estimated to be 22% of the normal chromosome, the midpoint of the segment is mapped at 0.61 of the chromosome distal to the kinetochore, and the ends of the segment are mapped at 0.50 to 0.72. Measurements of G-banded mitotic chromosomes give comparable values: duplication length, 24%; midpoint, 0.60, and segment ends, 0.48 and 0.71. This agreement constitutes further validation of the SC/spreading method for detecting and analyzing chromosomal rearrangements at pachytene and substantiates the fidelity with which the axes and SCs represent the behavior of chromosomes in synapsis.

Keywords

Percent Difference Chromosomal Rearrangement Segment Length Synaptonemal Complex Tandem Duplication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstine, E.G., Russell, L.B., Cain, C.S.: Effect of gene dosage on the expression of mitochondrial malic enzyme activity in the mouse. Nature (Lond.) 271, 748–750 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. Counce, S.J., Meyer, G.F.: Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex and the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy. Chromosoma (Berl.) 44, 231–253 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Gillies, C.B.: Ultrastructural analysis of Maize pachytene karyotypes by three dimensional reconstruction of the synaptonemal complexes. Chromosoma (Berl.) 43, 145–176 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Moses, M.J.: Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). I. Morphology of the autosomal complement in spread preparations. Chromosoma (Berl.) 60, 99–125 (1977a)Google Scholar
  5. Moses, M.J.: Microspreading and the synaptonemal complex in cytogenetic studies. Chromosomes today 6, 71–82 (1977b)Google Scholar
  6. Moses, M.J.: The synaptonemal complex as an indicator of chromosomal damage. Genetics 92 (Suppl.), s73-s82 (1979)Google Scholar
  7. Moses, M.J.: New cytogenetic studies on mammalian meiosis. In: Animal models in human reproduction (M. Serio, ed.), pp. 169–190. New York: Raven Press (1980)Google Scholar
  8. Moses, M.J., Russell, L.B., Cacheiro, N.L.A.: Mouse chromosome translocations: Visualization and analysis by electron microscopy of the synaptonemal complex. Science 196, 892–894 (1977a)Google Scholar
  9. Moses, M.J., Slatton, G., Gambling, T., Starmer, C.F.: Synaptonemal complex karyotyping in spermatocytes of the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus). III. Quantitatve evaluation. Chromosoma (Berl) 60, 345–375 (1977b)Google Scholar
  10. Moses, M.J., Poorman, P.A., Russell, L.B., Cacheiro, N.L.A., Solari, A.J.: The synaptonemal complex and a tandem duplication in the mouse. J. Cell Biol. 75, 135a (1977c)Google Scholar
  11. Moses, M.J., Poorman, P.A., Russell, L.B., Cacheiro, N.L.A., Roderick, T.H., Davisson, M.T.: Synaptic adjustment: two pairing phases in meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 79, 123a (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Moses, M.J., Poorman, P.A.: Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication. Chromosoma (Berl.) 81, 519–535 (1981)Google Scholar
  13. Russell, L.B., Russell, W.L., Cacheiro, N.L.A., Vaughan, C.M., Popp, R.A., Jacobson, K.B.: A tandem duplication in the mouse. Genetics 80, s71 (1975)Google Scholar
  14. Russell, L.B., Russell, W.L., Popp, R.A., Vaughan, C.M., Jacobson, K.B.: Radiation-induced mutations at mouse hemoglobin loci. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 73, 2843–2946 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. Solari, A.J.: The behaviour of chromosomal axes in Searle's X-autosome translocation. Chromosoma (Berl.) 34, 99–112 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Poorman
    • 1
  • M. J. Moses
    • 1
  • L. B. Russell
    • 2
  • N. L. A. Cacheiro
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Biology DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations