Advertisement

Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 242, Issue 5, pp 566–572 | Cite as

Binding of ArsR, the repressor of the Staphylococcus xylosus (pSX267) arsenic resistance operon to a sequence with dyad symmetry within the ars promoter

  • Ralf Rosenstein
  • Klaus Nikoleit
  • Friedrich Götz
Original Articles

Abstract

arsR, the first gene of the Staphylococcus xylosus (pSX267) arsenic/antimonite resistance (rs) operon encodes a negative regulatory protein, ArsR, which mediates inducibility of the resistances by arsenic and antimony compounds. ArsR, which has no obvious DNA-binding motif in its primary structure, was purified from an ArsR-overproducing Escherichia coli strain and identified as a DNA-binding protein by its behaviour in gel mobility shift assays. ArsR had a specific affinity for a 312 by DNA restriction fragment carrying the ars promoter; the minimum sequence complexed by ArsR was a 75 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment, which mainly comprised the −35 and −10 regions of the promoter. The effect of inducers on the DNA-binding activity of ArsR was examined by in vitro induction assays; only arsenite inhibited DNA-binding of the repressor. DNase I footprinting revealed two protected regions within the promoter region, spanning 23 and 9 nucleotides, respectively. Furthermore, a new cleavage site for DNase I between the protected regions was made accessible by binding of the repressor. The footprints cover a region of three inverted repeats located between the −35 and −10 motifs of the ars promoter. By high resolution footprinting with the hydroxy radical, five sites of close contact between the protein and DNA were identified.

Key words

Staphylococcus xylosus arsoperon ArsR repressor Gel shift assay Footprinting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JS, Struhl K (eds) (1990) Current protocols in molecular microbiology. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Götz F, Zabielski J, Philipson L, Lindberg M (1983) DNA homology between the arsenate resistance plasmid pSX267 from Staphylococcus xylosus and the penicillinase plasmid pI258 from Staphylococcus aureus. Plasmid 9:126–137Google Scholar
  3. Gray CP, Sommer R, Polke C, Beck E, Schaller H (1978) Structure of the origin of DNA replication of bacteriophage fd. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:50–53Google Scholar
  4. Ji G, Silver S (1992a) Reduction of arsenate to arsenite by the ArsC protein of the arsenic resistance operon from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9474–9478Google Scholar
  5. Ji G, Silver S (1992b) Regulation and expression of the arsenic resistance operon from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid p1258. J Bacteriol 174:3684–3694Google Scholar
  6. Kaur P, Rosen BP (1992) Plasmid-encoded resistance to arsenic and antimony. Plasmid 27:29–40Google Scholar
  7. Kreutz B, Götz F (1984) Construction of Staphylococcus plasmid vector pCA43 conferring resistance to chloramphenicol, arsenate, arsenite and antimony. Gene 31:301–304Google Scholar
  8. Rosenstein R, Peschel A, Wieland B, Götz F (1992) Expression and regulation of the antimonite, arsenite, and arsenate resistance operon of Staphylococcus xylosus plasmid pSX267. J Bacteriol 174:3676–3683Google Scholar
  9. Russel M, Model P (1984) Replacement of the fip gene of Escherichia coli by an inactive gene cloned on a plasmid. J Bacteriol 159:1034–1039Google Scholar
  10. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Schägger H, Jagow G (1987) Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379Google Scholar
  12. Silver S, Budd K, Leahy KM, Shaw WV, Hammond D, Novick RP, Willsky GR, Mallamy MH, Rosenberg H (1981) Inducible plasmid-determined resistance to arsenate, arsenite and antimony (III) in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 146:983–996Google Scholar
  13. Sizemore S, Wieland B, Götz F, Hillen W (1992) Regulation of Staphylococcus xylosus xylose utilization genes at the molecular level. J Bacteriol 174:3042–3048Google Scholar
  14. Struhl K (1989) Helix-turn-helix, zinc-finger, and leucine-zipper motifs for eukaryotic transcriptional proteins. Trends Biochem Sci l4:137–140Google Scholar
  15. Tabor S, Richardson CC (1985) A bacteriophage T7 polymerase/ promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1074–1078Google Scholar
  16. Tullius TD, Dombroski BA, Churchill MEA, Kam L (1987) Hydroxy radical footprinting: a high resolution method for mapping protein-DNA contacts. Methods Enzymol 155:537–558Google Scholar
  17. Wu J, Rosen BP (1993a) Metalloregulated expression of the ars operon. J Biol Chem 268:52–58Google Scholar
  18. Wu J, Rosen B (1993b) The arsD gene encodes a second trans-acting regulatory protein of the plasmid encoded arsenical resistance operon. Mol Microbiol 8:615–623Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralf Rosenstein
    • 1
  • Klaus Nikoleit
    • 1
  • Friedrich Götz
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Mikrobielle GenetikUniversität TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations