Advertisement

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

, Volume 97, Issue 4, pp 353–394 | Cite as

Phase transitions in one-dimensional nonlinear viscoelasticity: admissibility and stability

  • Robert L. Pego
Article

Abstract

For the motion of a one-dimensional viscoelastic material of rate type with a non-monotonic stress-strain relation, a mixed initial boundary value problem is considered. A simple existence theory is outlined, based on a novel transformation of the equation into the form of a degenerate reaction-diffusion system. This leads to new results characterizing the regularity of weak solutions. It is shown that each solution tends strongly to a stationary state asymptotically in time. Stable stationary states are characterized. Stable states may contain coexistent phases, i.e. they may have discontinuous strain. They need not be minimizers of energy in the strong sense of the calculus of variations; “metastable” and “absolutely stable” phases may coexist in a stable state. Furthermore, such states do arise as long-time limits of smooth solutions.

Beyond the above, “hysteresis” and “creep” phenomena are exhibited in a model of a loaded viscoelastic bar. Also, a viscosity criterion is proposed for the admissibility of propagating waves in the associated purely elastic model. This criterion is then applied to describe the formation of some propagating phase boundaries in a loaded elastic bar.

Keywords

Weak Solution Smooth Solution Viscoelastic Material Initial Boundary Elastic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. C. Aifantis & J. B. Serrin (1983), The mechanical theory of fluid interfaces and Maxwell's rule, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 96, 517–529.Google Scholar
  2. G. Andrews (1980), On the existence of solutions to the equation u tt = uxxt + σ(ux)x,J. Diff. Eqns. 35, 200–231.Google Scholar
  3. G. Andrews & J. M. Ball (1982), Asymptotic behaviour and changes of phase in one-dimensional nonlinear viscoelasticity, J. Diff. Eqns. 44, 306–341.Google Scholar
  4. C. M., Dafermos (1969), The mixed initial-boundary value problem for the equations of nonlinear one dimensional viscoelasticity, J. Diff. Eqns. 6, 71–86.Google Scholar
  5. J. L. Ericksen (1975), Equilibrium of bars, J. Elasticity 5, 191–201.Google Scholar
  6. J. W. Gibbs (1906), On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances, in The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
  7. J. M. Greenberg, R. C. MacCamy, & V. J. Mizel (1968), On the existence, uniqueness and stability of solutions of the equation σ′(ux) u xx + λuxxt= ρ0utt, J. Math. Mech. 17, 707–728.Google Scholar
  8. J. M. Greenberg (1969), On the existence, uniqueness and stability of the equation ρ0X tt = E(Xx)Xxx + λXxxt,J. Math. Anal. Appl. 25, 575–591.Google Scholar
  9. J. M. Greenberg & R. C. MacCamy (1970), On the exponential stability of solutions of E(ux) uxx + λuxtx= ρu tt,J. Math. Anal. Appl. 31, 406–417.Google Scholar
  10. R. Hagan & M. Slemrod (1983), The viscosity-capillarity admissibility criterion for shocks and phase transitions, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 83, 333–361.Google Scholar
  11. D. Henry (1981), Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, Lecture Notes in Math. v. 840, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  12. D. Hoff & J. Smoller (1985), Solutions in the large for certain nonlinear parabolic systems, Anal. Non Lin. 2, 213–235.Google Scholar
  13. J. Hunter & M. Slemrod (1983), Viscoelastic fluid flow exhibiting hysteretic phase changes, Phys. Fluids 26, 2345–2351.Google Scholar
  14. R. D. James (1980a), Coexistent phases in the one dimensional static theory of elastic bars, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 72, 99–140.Google Scholar
  15. R. D. James (1980b), The propagation of phase boundaries in elastic bars, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 73, 125–158.Google Scholar
  16. T.-P. Liu (1976), The entropy condition and the admissibility of shocks, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 53, 78–88.Google Scholar
  17. I. Müller & K. Wilmanski (1981), Memory alloys—phenomenology and ersatzmodel, in Continuum Models of Discrete Systems 4, eds. O. Brulin & R. K. T. Hsieh, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  18. T. J. Pence (1986), On the emergence and propagation of a phase boundary in an elastic bar with a suddenly applied end load. J. Elasticity 16, 3–42.Google Scholar
  19. M. Shearer (1982), The Riemann problem for a class of conservation laws of mixed type, J. Diff. Eqns. 46, 426–443.Google Scholar
  20. M. Shearer (1983), Admissibility criteria for shock wave solutions of a system of conservation laws of mixed type, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 93 A, 233–244.Google Scholar
  21. M. Shearer (1986), Nonuniqueness of admissible solutions of Riemann initial value problems for a system of conservation laws of mixed type, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 93, 45–59.Google Scholar
  22. M. Slemrod (1983), Admissibility criteria for propagating phase boundaries in a van der Waals fluid, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 81, 301–316.Google Scholar
  23. H. F. Weinberger (1982), A simple system with a continuum of stable inhomogeneous steady states, Lecture Notes in Num. Appl. Anal. 5, 345–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH & Co 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Pego
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsThe University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations