Human Genetics

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Genetics of Wilms' tumor

  • E. Matsunaga
Review Articles


The analyses of published data for Wilms' tumor show the following results:
  1. 1)

    The mode of inheritance of familial cases, which constitute less than 1% of all Wilms' tumors, is autosomal dominant with variable penetrance and expressivity. The familial pattern reveals no evidence that this tumor is associated with a vertically transmitting tumor virus.

  2. 2)

    There is a significant correlation between the first-degree relatives affected with Wilms' tumor in regard to expressivity as measured by the proportion of bilaterally affected or by the age of the patients at diagnosis. In particular, expressivity in the children affected varies consistently with expressivity in the carrier parents, indicating that inherited host resistance plays an important role in the manifestation of the major gene. The average risk of developing Wilms' tumor for offspring of unaffected carriers, who may be regarded as inherently resistant to tumor formation, is estimated at about 0.30. Although the data are limited, the risk for offspring of survivors of hereditary unilateral or bilateral cases may be as high as 0.40 or more. The data from seven pairs of monozygotic twins, including the discordant one associated with del(11 p) and aniridia, are consistent with the host resistance model.

  3. 3)

    In sporadic cases, the proportion of bilateral involvement is about 3%, in contrast with 20% in the familial cases. For bilateral cases, however, the distribution of ages of the patients at diagnosis is virtually the same whether sporadic or familial, and in two-thirds of the cases the disease is already bilateral when the first tumor is noted. These findings suggest that bilateral cases are probably always hereditary. Ages of the patients at diagnosis of sporadic unilateral cases tend to be much higher than in the patients with familial unilateral cases, indicating that most sporadic unilateral cases are nonhereditary. The overall risk for survivors of sporadic unilateral Wilms' tumor to transmit the disease to children may be as low 2∼4%.

  4. 4)

    Thus, a number of parallels are found between Wilms' tumor and retinoblastoma. The rate of germinal mutation per locus per generation is estimated at 3∼8×10-6 for Wilms' tumor, which does not seem to differ from 8∼14×10-6 for retinoblastoma. However, the incidence of nonhereditary Wilms' tumor per newborn is 7∼11×10-5, which is about twice that (3∼5×10-5) of nonhereditary retinoblastoma. This difference is possibly due to the greater number of cell divisions, resulting in an increased frequency of somatic mutations, of the embryonic cells involved in morphogenesis of the kidney than in the case of retinal development.

  5. 5)

    With increasing success in therapeutic management, it is anticipated that more and more cases of Wilms' tumor inherited from the survivors are emerging. However, even if complete cure of the disease and full recovery of fertility could be achieved for all the patients, about 10 generations may be required to double the present incidence of Wilms' tumor in the population, provided that other conditions remained the same.

  6. 6)

    Some guidelines for genetic counseling in families affected by Wilms' tumor are given.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aherne GE, Roberts DF (1975) Retinoblastoma — A clinical survey and its genetic implications. Clin Genet 8:275–290Google Scholar
  2. Baluda MA, Jamieson PP (1961) In vivo infectivity studies with avian myeloblastosis virus. Virology 14:33–45Google Scholar
  3. Bech K, Jensen OA (1961) Bilateral retinoblastoma in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 39:561–568Google Scholar
  4. Bishop HC, Hope JW (1966) Bilateral Wilms' tumors. J Pediatr Surg 1:476–487Google Scholar
  5. Bishop HC, Tefft M, Evans AE, D'Angio GJ (1977) Survival in bilateral Wilms' tumor: Review of 30 National Wilms' tumor study cases. J Pediatr Surg 12:631–638Google Scholar
  6. Bobbio L (1935) Tumeurs rénales congénitales (dysembryomes rénaux) familiales chez des hérédo-syphilitiques. Arch d mal d reins 9: 571–574Google Scholar
  7. Böhringer HR (1956) Statistik, Klinik und Genetik der Schweizerischen Retinoblastomfälle (1924–1954). Arch Julius-Klaus Stift Vererbungsforsch Sozialanthropol u Rassenhygiene 31:1–16Google Scholar
  8. Bonaïti-Pellié C, Briard-Guillemot ML, Feingold J, Frezal J (1976) Mutation theory of carcinogenesis in retinoblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 57:269–275Google Scholar
  9. Bond JV (1975) Bilateral Wilms' tumour: Age at diagnosis, associated congenital anomalies, and possible pattern of inheritance. Lancet II:482–484Google Scholar
  10. Bond JV (1977) Wilms' tumour, hypospadias, and cryptorchism in twins. Arch Dis Child 52:243–245Google Scholar
  11. Brown WT, Puranik SR, Altman DH, Hardin HC Jr (1972) Wilms' tumor in three successive generations. Surgery 72:756–761Google Scholar
  12. Carlson EA, Desnick RJ (1979) Mutational mosaicism and genetic counseling in retinoblastoma. Am J Med Genet 4:365–381Google Scholar
  13. Chapian MA (1948) Wilms' tumor: Report of two cases in the same family. RI Med J 31:105–109Google Scholar
  14. Cochran W, Froggatt P (1967) Bilateral nephroblastoma in two sisters. J Urol 97:216–220Google Scholar
  15. Collins VP (1955) Wilms' tumor: its behavior and prognosis. J Louisiana Med Soc 107:474–480Google Scholar
  16. Cordero JF, Li FP, Holmes LB (1978) Familial Wilms' tumor. Am J Hum Genet 30:117AGoogle Scholar
  17. Cordero JF, Li FP, Holmes LB, Gerald PS (1980) Wilms' tumor in five cousins. Pediatrics 66:716–719Google Scholar
  18. Cotlier E, Rose M, Moel SA (1978) Aniridia, cataracts, and Wilms' tumor in monozygous twins. Am J Ophthalmol 86:129–132Google Scholar
  19. Davies JNP (1967) Retinoblastoma as a possible index cancer. Lancet II:1039Google Scholar
  20. Deuticke P (1931) Nierentumoren. Deutsche Z Chir 231:767–797Google Scholar
  21. Draper GJ, Heaf MM, Kinnier Wilson LM (1977) Occurrence of childhood cancers among sibs and estimation of familial risks. J Med Genet 14:81–90Google Scholar
  22. Editorial (1973) Nephroblastoma: An index reference cancer. Lancet II:651Google Scholar
  23. Everson RB, Fraumeni JF Jr, Myers MH (1974) Improved survival in Wilms' tumor. Lancet I:1290–1291Google Scholar
  24. Fine PEM (1977) Analysis of family history data for evidence of non-Mendelian inheritance resulting from vertical transmission. J Med Genet 14:399–407Google Scholar
  25. Fischer-Wasels B (1933) Zur Erforschung und Bekämpfung bösartiger Geschwülste. Erblichkeit und Geschwulstbildung (1). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 59:1489–1494Google Scholar
  26. Fitzgerald WL, Hardin HC Jr (1955) Bilateral Wilms' tumor in a Wilms' tumor family: Case report. J Urol 73:468–474Google Scholar
  27. Ford EHR (1978) Complex patterns of inheritance in human disease. Nature 272:755–756Google Scholar
  28. Francke U, Riccardi VM, Hittner HM, Borges W (1978) Interstitial del(11 p) as a cause of the aniridia-Wilms' tumor association: Band localization and a heritable basis. Am J Hum Genet 30:81AGoogle Scholar
  29. Francke U, Holmes LB, Atkins L, Riccardi VM (1979) Aniridia-Wilms' tumor association: Evidence for specific deletion of 11p13. Cytogenet Cell Genet 24:185–192Google Scholar
  30. Fraumeni JF Jr, Everson RB, Dalager NA (1972) Declining mortality from Wilms' tumour in the United States. Lancet II:48Google Scholar
  31. Garrett RA, Donohue JP (1978) Bilateral Wilms' tumors. J Urol 120: 586–588Google Scholar
  32. Gaulin E (1951) Simultaneous Wilms' tumors in identical twins. J Urol 66:547–550Google Scholar
  33. Gordon H (1974) Family studies in retinoblastoma. Birth Defects X(10): 185–190Google Scholar
  34. Green DM, Fine WE, Li FP (1980) Offspring of long-term survivors of unilateral Wilms' tumor. Proceedings of 16th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 26–27, 1980, San Diego, California. Waverly Press, Baltimore, p 390Google Scholar
  35. Haldane JBS (1949) A test for homogeneity of records of familial abnormalities. Ann Eugen (London) 14:339–341Google Scholar
  36. Herrmann J (1977) Delayed mutation model: Carotid body tumors and retinoblastoma. In: Mulvihill JJ, Miller RW, Fraumeni JF Jr (eds) Genetics of human cancer. Raven Press, New York, p 417Google Scholar
  37. Hethcote HW, Knudson AG Jr (1978) Model for the incidence of embryonal cancers: Application to retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:2453–2457Google Scholar
  38. Hewitt D, Lashof JC, Stewart AM (1966) Childhood cancer in twins. Cancer 19:157–161Google Scholar
  39. Hittner HM, Riccardi VM, Francke U (1979) Aniridia caused by a heritable chromosome 11 deletion. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 86:1173–1183Google Scholar
  40. Juberg RC, Martin ECSt, Hundley JR (1975) Familial occurrence of Wilms' tumor: Nephroblastoma in one of monozygous twins and in another sibling. Am J Hum Genet 27:155–164Google Scholar
  41. Kaelin A (1955) Statistische Prüf- und Schätzverfahren für die relative Häufigkeit von Merkmalsträgern in Geschwisterreihen bei einem der Auslese unterworfenen Material mit Anwendung auf das Retinagliom. Arch Julius-Klaus Stift Verebungsforsch Sozialanthropol u Rassenhygiene 30:263–485Google Scholar
  42. Kanter YC, Harris JE (1964) Retinoblastoma occurring in one of a pair of identical twins. Arch Ophthalmol 72:783–787Google Scholar
  43. Kaschula ROC (1976) Familial extrarenal nephroblastoma. S Afr Med J 1:1013Google Scholar
  44. Kaufman RL, Vietti TJ, Wabner CI (1974) Wilms' tumor in father and son. Birth Defects X(10):191–193Google Scholar
  45. Kitchin FD, Ellsworth RM (1974) Pleiotropic effects of the gene for retinoblastoma. J Med Genet 11:244–246Google Scholar
  46. Knudson AG Jr (1971) Mutation and cancer: Statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:820–823Google Scholar
  47. Knudson AG Jr, Strong LC (1972) Mutation and cancer: A model for Wilms' tumor of the kidney. J Natl Cancer Inst 48:313–324Google Scholar
  48. Kontras SB, Newton WA Jr (1974) Familial Wilms' tumor. In: Bergsma D (ed) Clinical delineation of birth defect. XVI: Urinary system and others. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 187Google Scholar
  49. Leck I (1977) Congenital malformations and childhood neoplasms. J Med Genet 14:321–326Google Scholar
  50. Ledlie EM, Mynors LS, Draper GJ, Gorbach PD (1970) Natural history and treatment of Wilms' tumour: An analysis of 335 cases occurring in England and Wales 1962–6. Br Med J 2:195–200Google Scholar
  51. Lennox EL, Draper GJ, Sanders BM (1975) Retinoblastoma: A study of natural history and prognosis of 268 cases. Br Med J 3:731–734Google Scholar
  52. Li FP, Tucker MA, Fraumeni JF Jr (1976) Childhood cancer in sibs. J Pediatr 88:419–423Google Scholar
  53. Lyons AR, Grebbell FS, Nevin NC (1973) Growth impairment following irradiation in one of a pair of monozygotic twins. Clin Radiol 24: 370–375Google Scholar
  54. Mackay H (1945) Congenital bilateral megalo-ureters with hydronephrosis: A remarkable family history. Proc R Soc Med 38:27–28Google Scholar
  55. Macklin MT (1960) A study of retinoblastoma in Ohio. Am J Hum Genet 12:1–43Google Scholar
  56. Maslow LA (1940) Wilms' tumor: Report of three cases and a possible fourth one in the same family. J Urol 43:75–81Google Scholar
  57. Matsunaga E (1978a) Hereditary retinoblastoma: Delayed mutation or host resistance? Am J Hum Genet 30:406–424Google Scholar
  58. Matsunaga E (1978b) Recurrence risks to relatives of patients with retinoblastoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 22:313–319Google Scholar
  59. Matsunaga E (1979) Hereditary retinoblastoma: Host resistance and age at onset. J Natl Cancer Inst 63:933–939Google Scholar
  60. Matsunaga E (1980a) Hereditary retinoblastoma: Host resistance and second primary tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 65:47–51Google Scholar
  61. Matsunaga E (1980b) Retinoblastoma: Host resistance and 13q-chromosome deletion. Hum Genet 56:53–58Google Scholar
  62. Matsunaga E (1980c) Inherited tissue resistance to the gene for retino-blastoma. In: Gelboin HV, MacMahon B, Matsushima T, Sugimura T, Takayama S, Takebe H (eds) Genetic and environmental factors in experimental and human cancer. Japan Sci Soc Press, Tokyo, p 161Google Scholar
  63. Matsunaga E (to be published) Retinoblastoma: Mutational mosaicism or host resistance? Am J Med GenetGoogle Scholar
  64. Maurer HS, Pendergrass TW, Borges W, Honig GR (1979) The role of genetic factors in the etiology of Wilms' tumor. Two pairs of monozygous twins with congenital abnormalities (aniridia; hemihypertrophy) and discordance for Wilms' tumor. Cancer 43:205–208Google Scholar
  65. Meadows AT, Lichtenfeld JL, Koop CE (1974) Wilms' tumor in three children of a woman with congenital hemihypertrophy. N Engl J Med 291:23–24Google Scholar
  66. Miller RW, Fraumeni JF Jr, Manning MD (1964) Association of Wilms' tumor with aniridia, hemihypertrophy and other congenital malformations. N Engl J Med 1:922–927Google Scholar
  67. Miller RW (1971) Deaths from childhood leukemia and solid tumors among twins and other sibs in the United States, 1960–67. J Natl Cancer Inst 46:203–209Google Scholar
  68. Mohr RR, Murphy GP (1974) Wilms' tumor: Thirty-year review of cases in Buffalo. NY State J Med 1:660–665Google Scholar
  69. Murata M, Fujimaki K, Morikawa Y, Kusakawa S, Imai M (1972) Wilms' tumor in siblings, with special reference to bilateral cases. Shonika 13:67–74 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  70. Murphy ML (1968) Curability of cancer in children. Cancer 22:779–784Google Scholar
  71. Pendergrass TW (1976) Congenital anomalies in children with Wilms' tumor. A new survey. Cancer 37:403–408Google Scholar
  72. Reese AB (1976) Tumors of the eye, 3rd edn. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Riccardi VM, Sujansky E, Smith AC, Francke U (1978) Chromosomal imbalance in the aniridia-Wilms' tumor association: 11p interstitial deletion. Pediatrics 61:604–610Google Scholar
  74. Shinada Y, Uchino J, Hata Y, Ikeda Y, Sasaki F, Choi K (1977) Wilms' tumor in siblings. J Jpn Soc Pediat Surg 13:755–762Google Scholar
  75. Smith CAB (1957) On the estimation of intraclass correlation. Ann Hum Genet 21:363–373Google Scholar
  76. Strøm T (1957) A Wilms' tumour family. Acta Paediatr (Uppsala) 46: 601–604Google Scholar
  77. Taguchi N (1971) Epidemiology of Wilm's tumor. Proceeding of 1971 Meeting for the Study of Children's Malignant Neoplasms. Children's Cancer Association of Japan, Tokyo, p 9 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  78. Tebbi K, Gross S (1978) Wilm's tumor in a mother and child. J Pediatr 92:1026–1027Google Scholar
  79. Tsunoda A, Taguchi H, Akiyama H (1971) Bilateral Wilms' tumor (Second report). Geka 33:83–90 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  80. Vogel F (1957) Neue Untersuchungen zur Genetik des Retinoblastoms (Glioma retinae). Z Menschl Vererb Konstitutionsl 34:205–236Google Scholar
  81. Vogel F (1979) Genetics of retinoblastoma. Hum Genet 52:1–54Google Scholar
  82. Young JL Jr, Miller RW (1975) Incidence of malignant tumors in US children. J Pediatr 86:254–258Google Scholar
  83. Yunis JJ, Ramsay NKC (1980) Familial occurrence of the aniridia-Wilms' tumor syndrome with deletion 11p13-14.1. J Pediatr 96: 1027–1030Google Scholar
  84. Zunin C, Soave F (1964) Association of nephrotic syndrome and nephroblastoma in siblings. Ann Paediat (Basel) 203:29–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Matsunaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsNational Institute of GeneticsMishima, Shizuoka-KenJapan

Personalised recommendations