, Volume 45, Issue 2–3, pp 209–227 | Cite as

“Mises redux” — Redux: Fifteen arguments against finite frequentism

  • Alan Hájek


According to finite frequentism, the probability of an attribute A in a finite reference class B is the relative frequency of actual occurrences of A within B. I present fifteen arguments against this position.


Relative Frequency Reference Class Actual Occurrence Finite Frequentism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong, D. M.: 1983, What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Frieden, B. R.: 1991, Probability, Statistical Optics, and Data Testing, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Jeffrey, Richard: 1977, ‘Mises Redux’, in R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka (eds.), Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics.Google Scholar
  4. Kripke, Saul: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, David: 1986, Philosophical Papers, vol. II, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. LewisDavid: 1994, ‘Humean Supervenience Debugged’, Mind 103, 473–490.Google Scholar
  7. Reichenbach, Hans: 1949, The Theory of Probability, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Shafer, Glenn: 1976, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Skyrms, Brian: 1980, Causal Necessity, Yale 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Venn, John: 1876, The Logic of Chance, 2nd ed., Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  11. von Mises, Richard: 1957, Probability, Truth and Statistics, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Hájek
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Humanities and Social SciencesCalifornia Inst. of TechnologyPasadenaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations