Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 45, Issue 7, pp 304–308 | Cite as

Chromosome translocations in the karyotypes of wild boars Sus scrofa L. of the European and the Asian areas of USSR

  • V. N. Tikhonov
  • Anna I. Troshina
Article

Summary

The karyotypes of the 80 wild boars of the four subspecies, Sus scrofa ussuricus Heude from the Far East of USSR, S. s. nigripes Blanf. from Kirghizia (the Middle Asia), S. s. attila Thos. from Azerbaijan, S. s. ferus from Lithuania, Byelorussia and Central Russia, and the 44 domestic pigs of the five different breeds (Vietnamese Black, Siberian Omskaja Gray, Kakhethian-aborigen Georgian, Mangalica Hungarian, Landrace Swedish), were studied by the Giemsa Banding Method. Differential staining by the G-Method made it possible to identify all the homologous chromosomes of the wild and domestic pig karyotypes as well as to reveal the polymorphism of wild boar karyotypes (2n = 36, 37 and 38), which are determined by the two types of chromosome translocation. Crosses between domestic pigs (2n = 38) and wild boars (2n = 36 and 37) with different chromosome rearrangements might help to clarify the genetic function of the chromosomes A4, B3, B4, B5 and allow their use as genetic markers.

Keywords

Russia Genetic Marker Genetic Function Wild Boar Chromosome Rearrangement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Belyaev, D. K., Volobuev, V. T., Radzhabli, S. I., Trut L. N.: Chromosome polymorphism in Silver foxes (Russian). Summary, Second Meeting of the All-Union Society of Geneticists and Breeders, Issue I, 38 (1972).Google Scholar
  2. Evans, H. J., Buckton, K. E., Sumner, A. T.: Cytological mapping of human chromosomes; results obtained with quinacrine fluorescence and the acetic-saline-Giemsa techniques. Chromosoma (Berl.) 35, 310–325 (1971).Google Scholar
  3. Gustavsson, J., Hageltorn, M., Iohansson, C., Zech, L.: Identification of the pig chromosomes by the quinacrine mustard fluorescence technique. Exp. Cell Res. 70, 471–474 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. Hansen, K. M.: The karyotype of the pig (Sus scrofa domestica), identified by quinacrine mustard staining and fluorescence microscopy. Cytogenetics 11, 286–294 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. McFee, A. F., Banner, M. W.: Inheritance of chromosome number in pigs. J. Reprod. Fert. 18, 9–14 (1969).Google Scholar
  6. Seabright, M.: The use of proteolytic enzymes for the mapping of structural rearrangements in the chromosomes of man. Chromosoma (Berl.) 36, 204–210 (1972).Google Scholar
  7. Tikhonov, V. N., Troshina, A. I.: Karyotypes of some swine's breeds in connection with their phylogenesis (Russian). Selkhoz. biol., 6 (6), 874–881 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. Tikhonov, V. N., Troshina, A. I., Gorelov, I. G.: Cytogenetic studies of Far Eastern and Middle Asian wild boars and domestic pigs. (Russian). Izv. SO AN SSSR 10, 87 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. N. Tikhonov
    • 1
  • Anna I. Troshina
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the USSR Academy of SciencesNovosibirskUSSR

Personalised recommendations