Advertisement

Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 149, Issue 1, pp 5–21 | Cite as

Basis for the diversity of states of controlling elements in maize

  • Peter A. Peterson
Article

Summary

In maize the insertion of a controlling element such as the regulatory element, En, (Enhancer) at a locus generates diverse derivatives. These derivatives include stable phenotypes that range from colorless to full color. Distinguishable patterns are determined by timing and frequency of mutation events. It has been hypothesized that diverse expressions are based either on position of the controlling element at the locus or composition differences among controlling elements. — Experiments with two target loci, A2 and C, indicate that the previous pattern of a controlling element does not influence the pattern generated at a new site. This finding supports the hypothesis that these diverse trans-effects of En are not caused by a change in the genetic information of En itself but rather by its position; diverse expressions are a manifestation of the effect of an element at a specific locus site. — Controlling elements are discussed in relation to chromosome structure, gene activation, gene programming and possible parallels in prokaryotes.

Keywords

Color Maize Gene Activation Regulatory Element Genetic Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adhya, S.L., Shapiro, J.A.: The Galactose operon of E. coli K-12. I. Structural and pleiotropic mutations of the operon. Genetics 62, 221–247 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. Boram, W., Abelson, J.: Bacteriophage Mu integration: On the mechanism of Mu-induced mutations. J. molec. Biol. 62, 171–178 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Brink, R.A.: A stable somatic mutation to colorless from variegated pericarp in maize. Genetics 43, 435–477 (1958)Google Scholar
  4. Brink, R.A., Nilan, R.A.: The relation between light variegated and medium variegated pericarp in maize. Genetics 37, 519–544 (1952)Google Scholar
  5. Brink, R.A., Williams, E.: Mutable R-Navajo alleles of cyclic origin in maize. Genetics 73, 273–296 (1973)Google Scholar
  6. Britten, R.J., Davidson, E.H.: Gene regulation for higher cells. A theory. Science 165, 349–357 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Britten, R.J., Kohne, D.E.: Repeated sequences in DNA. Science 161, 529–540 (1968)Google Scholar
  8. Bukhari, A.I.: Reversal of mutator phage Mu integration. J. molec. Biol. 96, 87–99 (1975)Google Scholar
  9. Bukhari, A.I., Taylor, A.L.: Influence of insertions on packaging of host sequences covalently linked to bacteriophage Mu DNA. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 72, 4399–4403 (1975)Google Scholar
  10. Bukhari, A.I., Zipser, D.: Random-insertion of Mu-1-DNA within a single gene. Nature (Lond.) New Biol. 236, 240–243 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, David S.K., Freeling Michael. Methods of maize pollen in vitro germination, collection, storage, treatment with toxic chemicals and recovery of resistant mutants. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. (1976)Google Scholar
  12. Crick, F.H.C.: General model for the chromosome of higher organisms. Nature (Lond.) 234, 25–27 (1971)Google Scholar
  13. Daniell, E., Boram, W., Abelson, J.: Genetic mapping of the inversion loop in bacteriophage Mu DNA. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 70, 2153–2156 (1973)Google Scholar
  14. Emerson, R.A.: The inheritance of a recurring somatic variation in variegated ears of maize. Amer. Nat. 48, 87–115 (1914)Google Scholar
  15. Emerson, R.A.: Genetical studies of variegated pericarp in maize. Genetics 2, 1–35 (1917)Google Scholar
  16. Faelen, M., Toussaint, A., Couturier, M.: Mu-1 promoted integration of a λ-Gal phage in the chromosome of E. coli. Molec. gen. Genet. 113, 367–370 (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Fiandt, M., Szybalski, W., Malamy, M.H.: Polar mutations in lac, gal and phage λ consist of a few DNA sequences inserted with either orientation. Molec. gen. Genet. 119, 223–231 (1972)Google Scholar
  18. Fincham, J.R.S. and Sastry, G.R.K.: Controlling elements in maize. Ann. Rev. Genet. 8, 15–50 (1974)Google Scholar
  19. Flavell, R.B., Bennett, M.D., Smith, J.B., Smith, D.B.: Genome size and the proportion of reiterated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochem. Genet. 12, 257–269 (1974)Google Scholar
  20. Flavell, R.B., Smith, D.B.: Genome organization in higher plants. Stadler Genet. Symp. 7, (1975) (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Folwer, Robert, Peterson, Peter, A.: The a2m(r-pa-pu) allele of the En-controlling element system in maize. Genetics 76, 433–446 (1974)Google Scholar
  22. Freeling, Michael, Brown, Elvin: In situ staining of pollen grains for alcohol dehydrogenase activity. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. 49, 19–21 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. Georgiev, G.P., Varshavsky, A.J., Ryskov, A.P., Church, R.B.: On the structural organization of the transcriptional unit in animal chromosomes. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 869–884 (1973)Google Scholar
  24. Gierer, A.: Molecular models and combinatorial principles in cell differentiation and morphogenesis. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 951–961 (1973)Google Scholar
  25. Greenblatt, I.M.: Movement of modulator in maize: A test of an hypothesis. Genetics 77, 671–678 (1974)Google Scholar
  26. Hirsch, H.-J., Starlinger, P., Brachet, P.: Two kinds of insertions in bacterial genes. Molec. gen. Genet. 119, 191–206 (1972)Google Scholar
  27. Howe, M.M., and Zipser, D.: Host deletions caused by the integration of bacteriophage Mu-1. Abstracts of Annual Meeting of Amer. Soc. of Microbiol. No. 208, 235 (1974)Google Scholar
  28. Hsu, M.T., Davidson, N.: Structure of inserted bacteriophage Mu-1 DNA and physical mapping of bacterial genes by Mu-1 DNA insertion. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 69, 2823–2827 (1972)Google Scholar
  29. Jordan, E., Saedler, H., Starlinger, P.: 0° and strong-polar mutations in the gal operon are insertions. Molec. gen. Genet. 102, 353–363 (1967)Google Scholar
  30. Kedharnath, S., Brink, R.A.: Transposition and the stability of modulator in maize. Genetics 43, 695–704 (1958)Google Scholar
  31. McClintock, B.: Mutable loci in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 47, 155–169 (1948)Google Scholar
  32. McClintock, B.: Mutable loci in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 48, 142–154 (1949)Google Scholar
  33. McClintock, B.: Chromosome organization and genic expression. cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 16, 13–47 (1951)Google Scholar
  34. McClintock, B.: Controlling elements and the gene. Cold Spr. Harbor Symp. quant. Biol. 21, 197–216 (1956a)Google Scholar
  35. McClintock, B.: Intranuclear systems controlling gene action and mutation. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 8, 58–74 (1956b)Google Scholar
  36. McClintock, B.: The suppressor-mutator system of control of gene action in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 57, 414–429 (1958)Google Scholar
  37. McClintock, B.: Some parallels between gene control systems in maize and in bacteria. Amer. Nat. 95, 265–277 (1961)Google Scholar
  38. McClintock, B.: The control of gene action in maize in genetic control of differentiation. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 18, 162–184 (1965a)Google Scholar
  39. McClintock, B.: Components of action of the regulators Spm and Ac. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 64, 527–536 (1965b)Google Scholar
  40. McClintock, B.: Genetic systems regulating gene expression during development. Develop. Biol. 1 (Suppl.), 84–112 (1967a)Google Scholar
  41. McClintock, B.: Regulation of pattern of gene expression by controlling elements in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 65, 568–578 (1967b)Google Scholar
  42. McClintock, B.: The states of a gene locus in maize. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 66, 20–28 (1968)Google Scholar
  43. McClintock, B.: The contribution of one component of a control system to versatility of gene expression. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 70, 5–17 (1971)Google Scholar
  44. Michealis, G., Saedler, H., Venkov, P., Starlinger, P.: Two insertions in the galactose operon having different sizes but homologous DNA sequences. Molec. gen. Genet. 104, 371–377 (1969)Google Scholar
  45. Nelson, O.E.: The waxy locus in maize. II. The location of the controlling element alleles. Genetics 60, 507–524 (1968)Google Scholar
  46. Orton, E.R.: Frequency of reconstitution of the variegated pericarp allele in maize. Genetics 53, 17–25 (1966)Google Scholar
  47. Orton, E.R., Brink, R.A.: Reconstitution of the variegated pericarp allele in maize by transposition of modulator back to the P locus. Genetics 53, 7–16 (1966)Google Scholar
  48. Paul, J.: General theory of chromosome structure and gene activation in eucaryotes. Nature (Lond.) 238, 444–446 (1972)Google Scholar
  49. Peterson, P.A.: The pale green mutable system in maize. Genetics 45, 115–133 (1960)Google Scholar
  50. Peterson, P.A.: Mutable a 1 of the En system in maize. Genetics 46, 759–771 (1961)Google Scholar
  51. Peterson, P.A.: Phase variation of regulatory elements in maize. Genetics 54, 249–266 (1966)Google Scholar
  52. Peterson, P.A.: A comparison of the action of regulatory systems in maize and lysogenic bacteria. Genetics 56, 581 (1967)Google Scholar
  53. Peterson, P.A.: The origin of an unstable locus in maize. Genetics 59, 391–398 (1968)Google Scholar
  54. Peterson, P.A.: Controlling elements and mutable loci in maize: their relationship to bacterial episomes. Genetica 41, 33–56 (1970a)Google Scholar
  55. Peterson, P.A.: The En mutable system in maize. III. Transposition associated with mutational events. Theoret. appl. Genet. 40, 367–377 (1970b)Google Scholar
  56. Peterson, P.A.: Unstable genetic loci as a probe in morphogenesis. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 25, 244–259 (1974)Google Scholar
  57. Peterson, P.A.: Controlling elements in maize and the timing of mutability events. Genetics 80, s63–64 (1975)Google Scholar
  58. Peterson, P.A.: Controlling elements: The induction of mutablity at the A2 and c loci in maize. Proc. 1975 Int. Maize Symp. Wiley-Interscience, D. B. Walden (ed.) (in press) (1976a)Google Scholar
  59. Peterson, P.A.: Changes in state following transposition of a regulatory element of the Enhancer system in maize. Genetics (in press) (1976b)Google Scholar
  60. Reddy, A.R., Peterson, P.A.: Germinal derivatives of the En controlling element system in maize: Characterization of colored, pale and colorless derivatives of a2-m. Theoret. appl. Genet. (in press) (1976)Google Scholar
  61. Reif, H.J., Saedler, H.: IS1 is involved in deletion formation in the gal region of E. coli K-12. Molec. gen. Genet. 137, 17–28 (1975)Google Scholar
  62. Rhoades, M.M.: The genetic control of mutability in maize. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 9, 138–144 (1941)Google Scholar
  63. Saedler, H., Besemer, J., Kemper, B., Rosenwirth, B., Starlinger, P.: Insertion mutations in the control region of the gal operon of E. coli. I. Biological characterization of the mutations. Molec. gen. Genet. 115, 258–265 (1972)Google Scholar
  64. Saedler, H., Heiss, B.: Multiple copies of the insertion-DNA sequences IS1 and IS2 in the chromosome of E. coli K-12. Molec. gen. Genet. 122, 267–277 (1973)Google Scholar
  65. Saedler, H., Reij, H.J., Hu, S., Davidson, N.: IS2, a genetic element for turn-off and turn-on of gene activity in E. coli. Molec. gen. Genet. 132, 265–289 (1974)Google Scholar
  66. Shapiro, J.A.: Mutations caused by the insertion of genetic material into the falactose operon of E. coli. J. molec. Biol. 40, 93 (1969)Google Scholar
  67. Shapiro, J.A., Adhya, S.L.: The galactose operon of E. coli K-12. II. A deletion analysis of operon structure and polarity. Genetics 62, 249–264 (1969)Google Scholar
  68. Sharp, P., Hsu, M.T., Ohtsubo, E., Davidson, N.: Electron microscope heteroduplex studies of sequence relations among plasmids of E. coli. I. Structure of F-prime factors. J. molec. Biol. 71, 471–497 (1972)Google Scholar
  69. Starlinger, P., Saedler, H.: Insertion mutations in microorganisms. Biochimie 54, 177–185 (1972)Google Scholar
  70. Starlinger, P., Saedler, H.: IS elements in microorganisms. Current Topics (in press) (1976)Google Scholar
  71. Swift, Hewson: The organization of genetic material in eukaryotes: progress and prospects. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 963–979 (1973)Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, A.L.: Bacteriophage-induced mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 50, 1043–1051 (1963)Google Scholar
  73. Williams, E., Brink, R.A.: The effect of abnormal chromosome 10 on transposition of modulator from the R locus in maize. Genetics 71, 97–110 (1972)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter A. Peterson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmes

Personalised recommendations