Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 349–360 | Cite as

Electric brain potentials evoked by pictures of faces and non-faces: a search for “face-specific” EEG-potentials

  • K. Bötzel
  • O. -J. Grüsser
Article

Summary

In three different experimental series, electroencephalographic responses evoked by changes in pictorial patterns were recorded in 29 adult human subjects (19 females, 10 males). Quantitative data evaluation for the evoked responses from electrodes T5, T6, Cz, Pz (10–20 system) was performed. The stimuli were projected to a 4 × 6 degree binocularly viewed field. The patterns changed within 6 ms every 2.5–4.5 s according to a random program. Paradigm (1): Identical line drawings of a face, a tree and a chair were used, either black on white (P-stimuli) or white on black (N-stimuli); in each set altogether 160 slides appeared in semi-random order. At Cz and Pz a prototypical EEG-response evoked by face stimuli was found exhibiting 3 prominent peaks, very similar for P-stimuli and N-stimuli. A P150 maximum was especially pronounced in the responses to face stimuli but absent in the evoked potentials aroused by chair or tree stimuli. The difference curves (face-chair, face-tree, chair-tree) supported the hypothesis of “face-responsive” components in these responses. Paradigm (2): 4×6 degree slides (black and white photographs) of 54 different human faces, 53 different vases and 53 different pairs of shoes were projected as in paradigm (1), but instruction to the subjects on a supposed post-test memory task raised their attention during the recordings. “Face-responsive” components (an early N 140–160, P 210–240, N 300) were more marked in female than in male subjects, and again most pronounced at electrode Cz. Paradigm (3): When a recognition task was included in paradigm (2) — 9 out of 192 items were memorized 20 minutes before the recording session — essentially the same evoked potentials were obtained as in (2), but an additional late positive wave (450–600 ms) appeared in the responses to all stimuli. We assume that the “face-specific” components — a designation which is used cautiously considering the limited number of non-face stimuli — do not originate in the temporo-occipital cortical face region, but in limbic structures (amygdala, hippocampus) deep in the temporal lobe or in the gyrus cinguli. In the present study no significant hemispheric differences (T5, T6) in the evoked responses were found (all stimulus categories), but such differences are known to appear with highly schematic face stimuli.

Key words

Electroencephalogram Pattern evoked potentials Face stimuli Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson E, Parkin AJ (1985) On the nature of the left visual field advantage for faces. Cortex 21:453–459Google Scholar
  2. Baylis GC, Rolls ET, Leonard CM (1985) Selectivity between faces in the responses of a population of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Brain Res 342:91–102Google Scholar
  3. Bliestle A, Regard M, Landis T (1986) Prosopagnosia: an autopsied case. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 8:127Google Scholar
  4. Bodamer J (1948) Die Prosop-Agnosie. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 179:6–53Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw JL, Sherlock D (1982) Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: the analytical/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing. Cortex 18:211–226Google Scholar
  6. Creutzfeldt O (1987) Gibt es eine Mechanik des Denkens? Aus Forschung und Medizin 2:7–19Google Scholar
  7. Damasio AR, Damasio H, Hoesen GW van (1982) Prosopagnosia: anatomical basis and neurobehavioral mechanisms. Neurology 32:331–341Google Scholar
  8. Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross C, Bruce C (1984) Stimulusselective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. J Neurosci 4:2051–2062Google Scholar
  9. Grüsser OJ (1984) Face recognition within the reach of neurobiology and beyond it. Human Neurobiol 3:183–190Google Scholar
  10. Grüsser OJ, Selke T, Zynda B (1985) A developmental study of face recognition in children and adolescents. Human Neurobiol 4:33–39Google Scholar
  11. Häussler B (1988) Visuell evozierte Potentiale bei schematischen Gesichterstimuli. Dr. med.-Thesis. Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Hecaen H (1981) The neuropsychology of face recognition. In: Davies G, Ellis H, Shepherd J (eds) Perceiving and remembering faces. Academic Press, London, pp 39–54Google Scholar
  13. Hecaen H, Angelergues R (1962) Agnosia for faces. Arch Neurol 7:92–100Google Scholar
  14. Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 10:371–375Google Scholar
  15. Jeeves MA (1984) The historical roots and recurring issues of neurobiological studies of face perception. Human Neurobiol 3:191–196Google Scholar
  16. Jeffreys DA, Musselwhite MJ (1987) A face-responsive visual evoked potential in man. J Physiol 36 pGoogle Scholar
  17. Jung R (1953) Nystagmographie: zur Physiologie und Pathologie des optisch-vestibulären Systems beim Menschen. In: Bergmann G von, Frey W, Schwiegk H (eds) Handbuch der Inneren Medizin, Vol V/1. Springer, Berlin Göttingen Heidelberg, pp 1325–1379Google Scholar
  18. La Marche JA, Dobson WR, Cohn NB, Dustman RE (1986) Amplitudes of visual evoked potentials to patterned stimuli: age and sex comparisons. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 65:81–85Google Scholar
  19. Landis T, Lehmann D, Mita T, Skrandies W (1984) Evoked potential correlates of figure and ground. Int J Psychophysiol 1:345–348Google Scholar
  20. Landis T, Cummings JL, Christen L, Bogen JE, Imhof HG (1986) Are unilateral right posterior cerebral lesions sufficient to cause prosopagnosia? Clinical and radiological findings in six additional patients. Cortex 22:243–252Google Scholar
  21. Leonard CM, Rolls ET, Wilson FAW, Baylis GC (1985) Neurons in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Behav Brain Res 15:159–176Google Scholar
  22. Levy J, Sperry R, Trevarthen C (1972) Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. Brain 95:61–78Google Scholar
  23. Marzi CA, Tassinari G, Tressoldi PE, Barry C, Grabowska A (1985) Hemispheric asymmetry in face perception tasks of different cognitive requirement. Human Neurobiol 4:15–20Google Scholar
  24. Meadows JC (1974) The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 36:485–501Google Scholar
  25. Moscovitch M, Scullion D, Christie D (1976) Early versus late stages of processing and their relation to functional hemispheric asymmetries in face recognition. J Exp Psychol 2:401–416Google Scholar
  26. Neville H, Snyder E, Woods D, Galambos R (1982) Recognition and surprise alter the human visual evoked response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2121–2123Google Scholar
  27. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113Google Scholar
  28. Perret DI, Rolls ET, Caan W (1982) Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res 47:329–342Google Scholar
  29. Perret DI, Smith PAJ, Potter DD, Mistlin AJ, Head AS, Milner AD, Jeeves MA (1984) Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. Human Neurobiol 3:197–208Google Scholar
  30. Rolls ET (1984) Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Human Neurobiol 3:209–222Google Scholar
  31. Rolls ET, Baylis GC (1986) Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 65:38–48Google Scholar
  32. Schulman-Galambos C, Galambos R (1978) Cortical responses from adults and infants to complex visual stimuli. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 45:425–435Google Scholar
  33. Small M (1983) Asymmetrically evoked potentials in response to face stimuli. Cortex 19:441–450Google Scholar
  34. Sobotka S, Pizlo Z, Budohoska W (1984) Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to pictures of faces in the left and right visual field. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 58:441–453Google Scholar
  35. Srebro R (1985a) Localization of visually evoked cortical activity in humans. J Physiol 360:233–246Google Scholar
  36. Srebro R (1985b) Localization of cortical activity associated with visual recognition in humans. J Physiol 360:247–259Google Scholar
  37. Whiteley AM, Warrington EK (1977) Prosopagnosia: a clinical, psychological and anatomical study of three patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 40:395–403Google Scholar
  38. Zynda B (1984) Über das Wiedererkennen von Gesichtern. Dr. med.-Thesis. Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Bötzel
    • 1
  • O. -J. Grüsser
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches InstitutFreie Universität BerlinBerlin 33

Personalised recommendations