Polymorphism and distribution of Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Eights, 1833) (Crustacea, Isopoda) in the Weddell Sea and synonymy with C. cornuta (Studer, 1879)
Article
Received:
Accepted:
Summary
A rich collection of Ceratoserolis trilobitoides from the Antarctic Peninsula and the western and southern Weddell Sea is evaluated to describe the polymorphism and variations of the pigmentation. The species is very variable, though local populations show a relatively homogenous morphology. Transitional forms connect different morphotypes. Presumably the relative immobility of these animals, together with low fecundity and geographical or hydrographical barriers are responsible for the evolution of local races. C. cornuta and the “colour-spcies” of Cals (1977) are synonymized with C. trilobitoides.
Keywords
Local Population Antarctic Peninsula Relative Immobility Transitional Form Homogenous Morphology
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Cals P (1976) Polychromatisme, polytypisme scutellaire et modalités de la spéciation chez des Crustacés marins subantarctiques. Serolidae (Isopodes fabelliféres). Bull Soc Zool France 101:1027–1028Google Scholar
- Cals P (1977) Dérive continentale et spéciation du complex Ceratoserolis nov. gen., Crustacés antarctiques benthiques connus de l'Arc de la Scotia aux îles Kerguelen. C R Acad Sci, Ser D 284:2273–2276Google Scholar
- Carmack EC, Foster TD (1975) Circulation and distribution of oceanographic properties near the Filchner Ice Shelf. Deep-Sea Res 22:77–90Google Scholar
- Carvacho A (1977) Sur une importante collection d'isopodes des îles Kerguelen. CNFRA 42:173–191Google Scholar
- Clarke A (1982) Temperature and embryonic development in polar marine invertebrates. Int J Invert Reprod 5:71–82Google Scholar
- Cléret JC (1973) Invertébres de l'infralittoral rocheux dans l'archipel de Kerguelen. 2. Isopodes et Tanaidacés. CNFRA 32:31–36Google Scholar
- Eights J (1833) Description of a new Crustaceous animal found on the shores of the South Shetland Islands. Trans Albany Inst 2:53–57Google Scholar
- Gammelsrød T, Slotsvik N (1981) Hydrographic and current measurements in the Southern Weddell Sea 1979/80. Polarforschung 51:101–111Google Scholar
- Hale HM (1937) Isopoda and Tanaidacea. Australas Ant Exp Sci Rep. Ser C 2:1–45Google Scholar
- Hale HM (1952) Isopoda, families Cymothoidae and Serolidae. BANZARE 1929–1931, Rep Ser B 6:21–36Google Scholar
- Hodgson TV (1910) Isopoda. Nat Antarct Exp 1901–1904, 5:1–77Google Scholar
- Holdich DM, Harrison K (1980) Morphological variation in the Serolis minuta group (Isopoda: Serolidae) from Australian waters. Zool J Linn Soc 68:373–386Google Scholar
- Kussakin OG (1967) Isopoda and Tanaidacea from the coastal zones of the Antarctic and Subantarctic. In: Biological results of the Soviet Antarctic expedition (1955–58), 3. Issled Fauny Morei 4:220–380Google Scholar
- Kussakin OG (1982) Dopolnenie k faune ravnonogih rakoobraznyh sel'fovyh zon antarktiki (po materialam sovietskoj antarkticeskoj ekspedicii 1965–1968 gg.). In: Kafanov AI, Kussakin OG (eds) Fauna i rasprédelenie rakoobraznyh notal'nyh i antarkiceshik vod. Vladivostok: 73–105Google Scholar
- Kussakin OG, Vasina GS (1982) Addition to the fauna of benthic Isopoda and Gnathiidea (Crustacea) of subantarctic waters of the Indian Ocean. 1. Isopoda (Flabellifera and Anthuridea). Tethys 10:261–273Google Scholar
- Lipps JH, Roman TE, DeLaca TE (1979) Life below the Ross ice shelf, Antarctica. Science 203:447–449Google Scholar
- Luxmoore RA (1982) Moulting and growth in serolid isopods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 56:63–85Google Scholar
- Monod T (1926) Tanaidacés, isopodes et amphipodes. Résultats du voyage de la Belgica en 1897–1899. Exp Antarct Belge Rapp Sci Zool 4:1–67Google Scholar
- Moreira PS (1974) Cryptic protective coloration in Serolis laevis and Serolis polaris (Isopoda, Elabellifera). Crustaceana 27:1–4Google Scholar
- Nierstrasz NF (1931) Die Isopoden der Siboga-Expedition. 3. Isopoda genuina. 2. Flabellifera. Siboga Exp 32:123–233Google Scholar
- Nordenstam A (1933) Marine Isopoda of the families Serolidae, Idotheidae, Pseudidotheidae, Arcturidae, Parasellidae, Stenetriidae, mainly from the South Atlantic. Further Zool Res Swed Antarct Exp 1901–1903 3:1–284Google Scholar
- Presler P (1980) Phenological and physiological observations carried out during the first wintering at the Arctowski Station in 1977. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 27:245–252Google Scholar
- Richardson HE (1913) Crustacés Isopodes. Deuxième Expédition Antarctique Française (J Charcot) 1908–1910, Paris, pp 1–24Google Scholar
- Sheppard EM (1933) Isopod Crustacea Pt. 1. The family Serolidae. Discovery Rep 7:253–362Google Scholar
- Sheppard EM (1957) Isopod Crustacea Pt. 2. The suborder Valvifera: families: Idotheidae, Pseudidotheidae and Xenarcturidae fam. n. With a supplement to the Isopod Crustacea, Pt. 1. The family Serolidae. Discovery Rep 21:141–198Google Scholar
- Studer T (1879) Beiträge zur Kenntnis niederer Thiere von Kerguelensland. Arch Naturgesch 45:19–34Google Scholar
- Wägele JW (in press) On the reproductive biology of Ceratoserolis trilobitoides (Crustacea: Isopoda): latitudinal variation of fecundity and embryonic development. Polar BiolGoogle Scholar
- Willmann R (1985) Die Art in Raum und Zeit. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, 207 ppGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag 1986