Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 226, Issue 1–2, pp 224–232 | Cite as

The synthesis of the two S-adenosyl-methionine synthetases is differently regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Dominique Thomas
  • Yolande Surdin-Kerjan
Article

Summary

S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) is synthesized by transfer of the adenosyl moiety of ATP to the sulfur atom of methionine. This reaction is catalysed by AdoMet synthetase. In all eukaryotic organisms studied so far, multiple forms of AdoMet synthetases have been reported and from their recent study, it appears that AdoMet synthetase is an exceptionally well conserved enzyme through evolution. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have demonstrated the existence of two AdoMet synthetases encoded by genes SAM1 and SAM2. Yeast, which is able to concentrate exogenously added AdoMet, is thus a particularly useful biological system to understand the role and the physiological significance of the preservation of two almost identical AdoMet synthetases. The analysis of the expression of the two SAM genes in different genetic backgrounds during growth under different conditions shows that the expression of SAM1 and SAM2 is regulated differently. The regulation of SAM1 expression is identical to that of other genes implicated in AdoMet metabolism, where as SAM2 shows a specific pattern of regulation. A careful analysis of the expression of the two genes and of the variations in the methionine and AdoMet intracellular pools during the growth of different strains lead us to postulate the existence of two different AdoMet pools, each one suppplied by a different AdoMet synthetase but in equilibrium with each other. This could be a means of storing AdoMet whenever this metabolite is overproduced, thus avoiding the degradation of a metabolite the synthesis of which is energetically expensive.

Key words

Saccharomyces cerevisiae SAM1 and SAM2 genes Transcription 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alix J-H (1982) Molecular aspects of the in vivo and in vitro effects of ethionine, an analog of methionine. Microbiol Rev 46:281–295Google Scholar
  2. Cabrero C, Alemany S (1988) Conversion of rat liver S-adenosyl-l-methionine synthetase from high-Mr form to low-Mr form by LiBr. Biochim Biophys Acta 952:277–281Google Scholar
  3. Cantoni GL (1953) S-Adenosylmethionine: a new intermediate formed enzymatically from L-methionine and ATP. J Biol Chem 204:403–416Google Scholar
  4. Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Antoniewski J, de Robichon-Szulmajster H (1973) Effects of regulatory mutations upon methionine biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: loci eth2, eth3, eth10. J Bacteriol 115:1084–1093Google Scholar
  5. Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Exinger F, Lacroute F (1978) S-adenosylmethionine requiring mutants in Saccaromyces cerevisiae: evidence for the existence of two methionine adenosyl transferases. Mol Gen Genet 163:153–167Google Scholar
  6. Cohen SN, Chang ACY, Hsu L (1972) Non-chromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacterial genetic transformation of E. coli by R factor DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2110–2114Google Scholar
  7. Farooqui JZ, Woo Lee H, Kim S, Park WK (1983) Studies on compartmentation of S-adenosyl-l-methionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and isolated rat hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 747:342–351Google Scholar
  8. Ferro AJ, Spence KD (1973) Induction and repression in the Sadenosylmethionine and methionine biosynthetic systems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 116:812–817Google Scholar
  9. Hodgson CP, Fisk RZ (1987) Hybridization probe size control: optimized “oligolabelling”. Nucleic Acids Res 15:6295Google Scholar
  10. Hoffman CS, Winston F (1987) A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autnomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 57:267–272Google Scholar
  11. Horikawa S, Ishikawa M, Ozasa H, Tsukuda K (1989) Isolation of a cDNA encoding the rat liver S-adenosylmethionine synthetase. Eur J Biochem 184:497–501Google Scholar
  12. Horikawa S, Sasuga J, Shimizu K, Ozasa H, Tsukada K (1990) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of cDNA encoding the rat kidney S-adenosylmethionine synthetase. J Biol Chem 265:13683–13686Google Scholar
  13. Ish-Horowicz D, Burke JF (1981) Rapid and efficient cosmid cloning. Nucleic Acids Res 9:2989–2998Google Scholar
  14. Ito H, Fukuda K, Murata K, Kimura A (1983) Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol 153:163–168Google Scholar
  15. Kerjan P, Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1986) Nucleotide sequence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET25 gene. Nucleic Acids Res 14:7861–7871Google Scholar
  16. Kredich NH, Tomkins GM (1966) The enzymatic synthesis of Lcysteine in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem 241:4955–4965Google Scholar
  17. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275Google Scholar
  18. Markham JD, DeParisis J, Gatmaitan J (1984) The sequence of MetK, the structural gene for S-adenosylmethionine synthetase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 259:14505–14507Google Scholar
  19. Miller JH (1972) Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Mudd SJ, Levy HL (1983) Disorders of transsulfuration. In: Stanbury JB, Wyngaarden JB, Fredrickson DS, Goldstein JL, Brown MS (eds) The metabolic basis of inherited disease, 5th edn. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, pp 522–559Google Scholar
  21. Peleman J, Boerjan W, Engler G, Seurink J, Botterman J, Alliote T, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1989a) Strong cellular preference in the expression of a housekeeping gene of Arabidopsis thaliana encoding S-adenosylmethionine synthetase. Plant Cell 1:81–93Google Scholar
  22. Peleman J, Saito K, Cottyn B, Engler G, Seurink J, Van Montagu M, Inzé D (1989b) Structure and expression analyses of the S-adenosylmethionine synthetase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 84:359–369Google Scholar
  23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Satishchandran C, Taylor JC, Markham GD (1990) Novel Escherichia coli K-12 mutants impaird in S-adenosylmethionine synthesis. J Bacteriol 172:4489–4496Google Scholar
  25. Shapiro SK, Ehninger DJ (1966) Methods for the analysis and preparation of Adenosylmethionine and Adenosylhomocysteine. Anal Biochem 15:323–333Google Scholar
  26. Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB (1979) Methods in yeast genetics: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Surdin-Kerjan Y, de Robichon-Szulmajster H (1975) Existence of two levels of repression in the biosynthesis of methionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of lomogungin on enzyme synthesis. J Bacteriol 122:367–374Google Scholar
  28. Tabor CW, Tabor H (1985) Polyamines in microorganisms. Microbiol Rev 49:81–99Google Scholar
  29. Thomas D, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1987) SAM1, the structural gene for one of the S-adenosylmethionine synthetases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 262:16704–16709Google Scholar
  30. Thomas D, Rothstein R, Rosenberg N, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1988) Sam2 encodes the second methionine S-adenosyl transferase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: physiology and regulation of both enzymes. Mol Cell Biol 8:5132–5139Google Scholar
  31. Thomas D, Cherest H, Surdin-Kerjan Y (1989) Elements involved in S-adenosylmethionine mediated regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MET25 gene. Mol Cell Biol 9:3292–3298Google Scholar
  32. Wiebers JL, Garner MR (1967) Acyl derivatives of homoserine as substrate for homocysteine synthesis in Neurospora crassa, yeast and Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 242:5644–5649Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Thomas
    • 1
  • Yolande Surdin-Kerjan
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Enzymologie du CNRSGif-sur-Yvette cedexFrance

Personalised recommendations