Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 215–222 | Cite as

Effects of scheduling and ascites-associated macrophages on combined antiproliferative activity of alpha-2b interferon and gamma-interferon in a clonogenic assay

  • Junichiro Higashihara
  • Toshiaki Saito
  • Michael E. Berens
  • Charles E. Welander
Original Articles Ascites-Associated Macrophages, α-2b Interferon, λ-Interferon, Clonogenic Assay

Summary

Effects of combination treatment with human recombinant alpha-2b interferon (IFN-α2b) and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and sequencing of the combination on colony formation of human tumor cells were studied in a human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) with or without ascites-associated macrophages (AAM). Five different human tumor cell lines were studied. Three of the five cell lines (ovarian cancer cell line BG-1, cervical cancer cell line ME-180, and melanoma cell line SK-MEL 28) were sensitive to both IFNs.Cervical cancer cell line CaSki was sensitive to IFN-α2b but resistant to IFN-γ. Endometrial cancer cell line HEC-1A was resistant to both IFNs. Synergistic interaction was observed in BG-1 and SK-MEL 28 with a combination of the IFNs. ME-180 did not exhibit a positive interaction, in spite of its sensitivity to each IFN. CaSki and HEC-1A also did not exhibit a positive combined interaction at clinically achievable concentrations. One sequential combination method (method 1: IFN-α2b → IFN gamma with a 24-h interval) resulted in a similar antitumor effect as the simultaneous combination. A reversed sequential method (method 2: IFN-γ → IFN-α2b with a 24-h interval) was less effective in three of the five cell lines. In BG-1, AAM enclosed in the lower layer markedly enhanced the antitumor effect of combined IFNs as well as each IFN alone. The antitumor effect with method 1 was significantly greater than that achieved with simultaneous combination or combination according to method 2 in the presence of AAM (P<0.01). These results suggest that (1) a synergistic antitumor effect of IFN-α2b and IFN gamma is demonstrable in selected types of tumors, depending upon the sensitivity of each tumor cell line to both IFNs; (2) optimal scheduling for the direct antitumor effect of combined IFNs seems to be long-term exposure of cells to the IFN, the cells being treated with both IFNs either simultaneously or sequentially (IFN-α2b preceding IFN-γ); and (3) AAM potentiate the antitumor effect of IFNs either alone or in combination. Finally, IFN-α2b may have some priming effects for the indirect effect of IFN gamma mediated through AAM in certain tumor cells.

Keywords

Antitumor Effect Endometrial Cancer Cell Endometrial Cancer Cell Line Synergistic Antitumor Effect Simultaneous Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baglioni C, Maroney PA (1980) Mechanism of action of human interferons: induction of 2′5′-oligo(A) polymerase. J Biol Chem 255: 8390Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balkwill FR, Moodie EM (1984) Positive interaction between human interferon and cyclophosphamide or adriamycin in a human tumor model system. Cancer Res 44: 904Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berenbaum MC (1981) Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents. Adv Cancer Res 35: 269Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blalock JE, Georgiades JA, Langford MP, Johnson HM (1980) Purified human immune interferon has more potent anticellular activity than fibroblast or leukocyte interferon. Cell Immunol 49: 390Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blasi E, Herberman RB, Varesio L (1984) Requirement for protein synthesis for induction of macrophage tumoricidal activity by IFN-α and IFN-β but not by IFN-γ. J Immunol 132: 3226Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonnem EM, Oldham RK (1987) Gamma-interferon: physiology and speculation on its role in medicine. J Biol Response Mod 6: 275Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Branca AA, Baglioni C (1981) Evidence that type I and II interferons have different receptors. Nature 294: 768Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carey T, Takahashi T, Resnick LA, Oettgen HF, Old LJ (1976) Cell surface antigens of human malignant melanoma: mixed hemadsorption assays for humoral immunity to cultured autologous melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73: 3278Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Czarniecki CW, Fennie CW, Powers DB, Estell DA (1984) Synergistic antiviral and antiproliferative activities of Escherichia coli-derived human alpha, beta, and gamma interferons. J Virol 49: 490Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dianzani F, Salter L, Fleischmann WR Jr, Zucca M (1978) Immune interferon activates cells more slowly than does virus-induced interferon. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 159: 94Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Maeyer-Guignard J, De Maeyer E (1985) Immunomodulation by interferons: recent developments: In: Gresser I (ed) Interferon, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, p 69Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fleischmann WR Jr (1982) Potentiation of the direct anticellular activity of mouse interferons: mutual synergism and interferon concentration dependence. Cancer Res 42: 869Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gaines JT, Welander CE, Homesley HD (1983) Improved cloning efficiency in the human tumor stem cell assay using Ficoll gradient separation. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 24: 311Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldstein D, Laszlo J (1986) Interferon therapy in cancer: from imaginon to interferon. Cancer Res 46: 4315Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gresser I (1972) Antitumor effects of interferon. Adv Cancer Res 16: 97Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamburger AW, Salmon SE (1977) Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 197: 461Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Isaacs A, Lidenmann J (1957) Virus interference. I. The interferon. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 147: 258Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kempf RA, Greenberg SM, Daniels JR (1984) Recombinant interferon alpha 2 in a Phase II study of renal cell carcinoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 3: 59Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kressner BE, Morton RRA, Mertens AE, Salmon SE, Von Hoff DD, Soehnlen B (1980) Use of an image analysis system to ccunt colonies in stem sell assays of human tumors: In: Salmon SE (ed) Cloning of human stem cells. Liss, New York, p 179Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuramoto H, Tamura S, Notake U (1972) Establishment of a cell line of human endometrial adenocarcinoma in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 114: 1012Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kurzrock R, Rosenblum MG, Quesada JR, Sherwin SA, Itri LM, Gutterman JU (1986) Phase I study of a recombinant interferon-alpha and recombinant interferon-gamma in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 4: 1677Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Le J, Yip YK, Vilcek J (1984) Cytotoxic activity of interferon-gamma and its synergism with 5-fluorouracil. Int J Cancer 34: 495Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miller GA, Morahan PS (1981) Use of nonspecific esterase stain: In: Adams DO, Edelson PJ, Koren HS (eds) Methods for studing mononuclear phagocytes. Academic Press, New York, p 367Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pace JL, Russel SW, LeBlanc PA, Murasko DM (1985) Comparative effects of various classes of mouse interferons on macrophage activation for tumor cell killing. J Immunol 134: 977Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pattillo RA, Hussa RO, Story MT, Ruckert ACF, Shalaby MR, Mattingly RF (1977) Tumor antigen and human chorionic gonadotropin in CaSki cells: a new epidermoid cervical cancer cell line. Science 196: 1456Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Quesda JR, Rueben J, Manning JT, Hersh EM, Gutterman JU (1984) Alpha interferon for induction of remission in hairy cell leukemia. N Engl J Med 310: 15Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Real FX, Oettgen HF, Krown SE (1986) Kaposi's sarcoma and the aquired immunodeficiency syndrome: treatment with high and low doses of recombinant leukocyte A interferon. J Clin Oncol 4: 544Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saito T, Berens ME, Welander CE (1986) Direct and indirect effects of human γ-interferon on tumor cells in a clonogenic assay. Cancer Res 46: 1142Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saito T, Berens ME, Welander CE (1987) Characterization of the indirect antitumor effect of γ-interferon using ascites-associated macrophages in a human tumor clonogenic assay. Cancer Res 47: 673Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schiller JH, Groveman DS, Schmid SM, Willson JKV, Cummings KB, Borden EC (1986) Synergistic antiproliferative effects of human recombinant 222-1 with γ-interferon on human cell lines of various histogenesis. Cancer Res 46: 483Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spiegel RJ (1987) Clinical overview of alpha interferon: studies and future directions. Cancer 59: 626Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Strander H (1977) Antitumor effects of interferon and its posible use as an antineoplastic agent in man. Tex Rep Biol Med 35: 429Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sykes JA, Whitescarver J, Jernstrom P, Nolan JF (1970) Some properties of a new epithelial cell line of human origin. J Natl Cancer Inst 45: 107Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Talpaz M, McCredie KB, Mavligit GM, Gutterman JU (1983) Leukocyte interferon-induced myeloid cytoreduction in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood 62: 689Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Valeriote F, Lin H (1975) Synergistic interaction of anticancer agents: A cellular perspective. Cancer Chemother Rep 59: 895Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Welander CE (1987) Use of interferon in the treatment of ovarian cancer as a single agent and in combination with cytotoxic drugs. Cancer 59: 617Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Welander CE, Morgan TM, Homesley HD, Trotta PP, Spiegel RJ (1985) Combined recombinant human interferon alpha2 and cytotoxic agents studied in a clonogenic assay. Int J Cancer 35: 721Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junichiro Higashihara
    • 1
  • Toshiaki Saito
    • 1
  • Michael E. Berens
    • 1
  • Charles E. Welander
    • 1
  1. 1.Section on Gynecologic OncologyBowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations