Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 323–326

A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis

  • M. Singh
  • R. K. Singh


A comparison among various forms of half-diallel analysis was made. The different half-diallel techniques used were: Griffing's model I, method 2 and 4, Morley-Jones' model; Walters and Morton's model, and Gardner and Eberhart's model. All these methods of diallel analysis were found to be interrelated. However, as the Gardner and Eberhart's model partitioned heterosis into different components as well as gave information about combining ability, this method had certainly some advantages over the others. The results further indicated the possibility of dominance variance being confounded with the additive variance of general combining ability.

Key words

Half diallel Heterosis Combining ability Half-diallel models Genetic components Mungbean 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chung JH, Stevenson E (1973) Diallel analysis of the genetic variation in some quantitative traits in dry beans. NZJ Agric Res 16:223–231Google Scholar
  2. Gardner CO, Eberhart SA (1966) Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related population. Biometrics 22:439–452Google Scholar
  3. Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493Google Scholar
  4. Gupta VP, Ramanujam S (1974) Cumulative gene effects and genetic parameters of heterosis in F1 and F2 generation of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Genetika 6:263–275Google Scholar
  5. Gupta VP, Ramanujam S, Kaul AK (1974) Genetic analysis in respect to protein content and protein quality in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Genetika 6:231–245Google Scholar
  6. Hayes JD, Paroda RS (1974) Parental generation in relation to combining ability analysis in spring barley. Theor Appl Genet 44:373–377Google Scholar
  7. Hayman BI (1954) The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–244Google Scholar
  8. Jugenheimer RW (1976) Corn improvement, seed production and uses. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Kearsey MJ (1965) Biometrical analysis of random mating population: a comparison of five experimental designs. Heredity 20:205–235Google Scholar
  10. Matzinger DF (1963) Experimental estimates of genetic parameters and their application in self fertilizing plants. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC, Washington, pp 81–90Google Scholar
  11. Morley-Jones R (1965) Analysis of variance on the half diallel table. Heredity 20:117–121Google Scholar
  12. Walters DE, Morton JR (1978) On the analysis of variance of a half diallel table. Biometrics 34:91–94Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Singh
    • 1
  • R. K. Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsHaryana Agricultural UniversityHissarIndia

Personalised recommendations