Kybernetik

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 47–52

Optische Eigenschaften der Ommatidien im Komplexauge von Musca

  • K. Kirschfeld
  • N. Franceschini
Article

Summary

Optical characteristics of the dioptric system in the ommatidia of Musca have been analysed by use of “antidromic illumination” of the eye. The results indicate that the distal endings of the rhabdomers terminate near the focal plane of the dioptrics and that the quality of the lens is high enough to resolve some details of their shape. — Using optical methods it has been possible to confirm directly that the optical axes of 7 individual rhabdomers from 7 different ommatidia all converge to a common point in the distant surroundings. This is a characteristic for compound eyes of the “neural superposition” type. — The results are discussed on the basis of the hypothesis that the Musca eye is composed of two functionally different subsystems: One system (D) with high absolute sensitivity and low spatial resolution consisting of the sense cells no. 1 to 6, and a second system (H) with high spatial resolution and low absolute sensitivity composed of cells no. 7 and 8.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Barlow, H. B.: The size of ommatidia in apposition eyes. J. exp. Biol. 29, 667–674 (1952); - Visual resolution and the diffraction limit. Science 149, 553–556 (1965).Google Scholar
  2. Braitenberg, V.: Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. I. Retina-Lamina projections. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 271–298 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. Fermi, G., u. W. Reichardt: Optomotorische Reaktionen der Fliege Musca domestica. Abhängigkeit der Reaktion von der Wellenlänge, der Geschwindigkeit, dem Kontrast und der mittleren Leuchtdichte bewegter periodischer Muster. Kybernetik 2, 15–28 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. Götz, K. G.: Optomotorische Untersuchungen des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik 2, 77–92 (1964); - Die optischen Übertragungseigenschaften der Komplexaugen von Drosophila. Kybernetik 2, 215–221 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. Kirschfeld, K.: Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 248–270 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. Kuiper, J. W.: On the image formation in a single ommatidium of the compound eye of diptera. The functional organization of the compound eye. Proceedings of the Internat. Symposium held in Stockholm, October 1965, Wenner-Gren Center. Internat. Symposium Series 7. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Langer, H.: Nachweis dichroitischer Absorption des Sehfarbstoffes in den Rhabdomeren des Insektenauges. Z. vergl. Physiol. 51, 258–263 (1965a); - Spektrometrische Untersuchungen der Absorptionseigenschaften einzelner Rhabdomere im Facettenauge. Verh. dtsch. zool. Ges. 329–338 (1965b).Google Scholar
  8. Langer, H., and B. Thorell: Microspectrophotometry of single rhabdomeres in the insect eye. Exp. Cell Res. 41, 673–677 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. Mallock, A.: Divided composite eyes. Nature (Lond.) 110, 770–771 (1922).Google Scholar
  10. McCann, G. D., and G. F. MacGinitie: Optomotor response studies of insect vision. Proc. roy. Soc. Edinb. B 163, 369–401 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Palka, J.: Diffraction and visual acuity of insects. Science 149, 551–553 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. Reichardt, W.: Über das optische Auflösungsvermögen der Facettenaugen von Limulus. Kybernetik 1, 57–69 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. Schneider, G.: Zur Spektralempfindlichkeit des Komplexauges von Calliphora. Z. vergl. Physiol. 39, 1–20 (1956).Google Scholar
  14. Trujillo-Cenóz, O., and J. Melamed: Electron microscope observations on the peripheral and intermediate retinas of dipterans. The functional organization of the compound eye. Proceedings of the Internat. Symposium held in Stockholm, October 1965, Wenner-Gren Center. Internat. Symposium Series 7. Oxford: Pergamon Press; - Compound eye of dipterans: Anatomical basis for integration. An electron microscope study. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 16, 395–398 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. Vries, H. de: Physical aspects of sense organs. Progr. Biophys. 6, 208–264 (1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kirschfeld
    • 1
  • N. Franceschini
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für biologische KybernetikTübingen

Personalised recommendations