Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 266–269 | Cite as

Initiation and characterization of a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) photoautotrophic cell suspension culture

  • L. Curt Blair
  • Chris J. Chastain
  • Jack M. Widholm
Article

Abstract

A heterotrophic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Stoneville 825) cell suspension culture was adapted to grow photoautotrophically. After two years in continuous photoautotrophic culture at 5% CO2 (balance air), the maximum growth rate of the photoautotrophic cell line was a 400% fresh weight increase in eight days. The Chl concentration was approximately 500 μg per g fresh weight.

Elevated CO2 (1%–5%) was required for culture growth, while the ambient air of the culture room (600 to 700 ul CO2 1−1) or darkness were lethal. The cell line had no net photosynthesis at 350 ul 1−1 CO2, 2% O2, and dark respiration ranged from 29 to 44 μmol CO2 mg−1 Chl h−1. Photosynthesis was inhibited by O2. The approximate 1:1 ratio of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPcase) to phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPcase) (normally about 6:1 in mature leaves of C3 plants) was due to low RuBPcase activity relative to that of C3 leaves, not to high PEPcase activity. The PEPcase activity per unit Chl in the cell line was identical to that of spinach leaves, while the RuBPcase activity was only 15% of the spinach leaf RuBPcase activity. RuBPcase activity in the photoautotrophic cells was not limited by a lack of activation in vivo, since the enzyme in a rapidly prepared cell extract was 73% activated. No evidence of enzyme inactivation by secondary compounds in the cells was found as can be found with cotton leaves. Low RuBPcase activity and high respiration rates are most likely important factors in the low photosynthetic efficiency of the cells at ambient CO2.

Keywords

Cell Suspension Culture Gossypium Hirsutum Ribulose High Respiration Rate Cotton Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

Chl

chlorophyll

COT

heterotrophic cotton cell line

COT-P

photoautotrophic cotton cell line

DCMU

3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea

HEPES

N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid

Rubisco

ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

RuBP

ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate

RuBPcase

RuBP carboxylase

PEP

phosphoenolpyruvate

PEPcase

phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase

MX

Murashige and Skoog medium with 0.4 mg 1−1 2,4-D

KT

photomixotrophic medium with 1% sucrose

KTo

KT medium with no carbohydrate

KTPo

KTo medium supplemented with 0.3 μM Picloram

CER

CO2 exchange rate

PCER

CO2 exchange rate in the light

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azcon-Bieto J, Osmond CB (1983) Plant Physiol 71:574–581Google Scholar
  2. Chastain CJ, Ogren WL (1985) Plant Physiol 77:851–856Google Scholar
  3. Cseplo A, Medgyesy P, Hileg E, Demeter S, Marton L, Maliga (1985) Mol Gen Genet 200:508–510Google Scholar
  4. Erdos G, Shinohara K, Buetow DE (1986) In: Akoyunoglou G, Senger H eds, Regulation of chloroplast differentiation, A R Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Forrester ML, Krotkov G, Nelson CD (1966) Plant Physiol 41:422–427Google Scholar
  6. Horn ME, Sherrard JH, Widholm JM (1983) Plant Physiol 72:426–429Google Scholar
  7. Horn ME, Widholm JM (1984) In: Collins GB, Petolino JF eds, Applications of genetic engineering to crop improvement, Martinus Nijhoff Dr. W. Junk Publ., Boston, pp 113–161Google Scholar
  8. Kisaki T, Hirabayashi S, Yano N (1973) Plant Cell Physiol 14:505–514Google Scholar
  9. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–479Google Scholar
  10. Neumann KH, Bender L (1987) In: Green CE, Somers DA, Hackett WP, Biesboer DD eds, Plant tissue and cell culture, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 151–165Google Scholar
  11. Rogers SMD, Ogren WL, Widholm JM (1987) Plant Physiol 84:1451–1456Google Scholar
  12. Servaites JC, Ogren WL (1977) Plant Physiol 60:461–466Google Scholar
  13. Sharp RE, Matthews MA, Boyer JS (1984) Plant Physiol 75:95–101Google Scholar
  14. Widholm JM (1972) Stain Technol 47:189–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Curt Blair
    • 1
  • Chris J. Chastain
    • 1
  • Jack M. Widholm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations