Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 889–892 | Cite as

Efficient production of doubled haploid plants through colchicine treatment of anther-derived maize callus

  • Y. Wan
  • J. F. Petolino
  • J. M. Widholm


A chromosome doubling technique, involving colchicine treatment of an embryogenic, haploid callus line of maize (Zea mays L., derived through anther culture), was evaluated. Two colchicine levels (0.025% and 0.05%) and three treatment durations (24, 48, and 72 h) were used and compared to untreated controls. Chromosome counts and seed recovery from regenerated plants were determined. No doubled haploid plants were regenerated from calli without colchicine treatment. After treatment with colchicine for 24 h, the callus tissue regenerated about 50% doubled haploid plants. All of the plants regenerated from the calli treated with colchicine for 72 h were doubled haploids, except for a few tetraploid plants. No significant difference in chromosome doubling was observed between the two colchicine levels. Most of the doubled haploid plants produced viable pollen and a total of 107 of 136 doubled haploid plants produced from 1 to 256 seeds. Less extensive studies with two other genotypes gave similar results. These results demonstrate that colchicine treatment of haploid callus tissue can be a very effective and relatively easy method of obtaining a high frequency of doubled haploid plants through anther culture.

Key words

Zea mays Anther culture Embryogenic haploid callus Chromosome doubling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chu CC, Wang CC, Sun CS, Hsu C, Yin KC, Chu CY (1975) Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Sci Sin 18:659–668Google Scholar
  2. Coe EH, Neuffer MG (1978) Embryo cells and their destinies in the corn plant. In: Subtelny S, Sussex IM (eds) The clonal basis of development. Academic Press, New York, pp 113–129Google Scholar
  3. Duncan DR, Williams ME, Zehr BE, Widholm JM (1985) The production of callus capable of plant regeneration from immature embryos of numerous Zea mays genotypes. Planta 165:322–332Google Scholar
  4. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158Google Scholar
  5. Genovesi AD, Collins GB (1982) In vitro production of haploid plants of corn via anther culture. Crop Sci 22:1137–1144Google Scholar
  6. Ku MK, Cheng WC, Kuo LC, Kuan YL, An HP, Huang CH (1978) Induction factors and morpho-cytological characteristics of pollen-derived plants in maize (Zea mays). In: Proceedings of symposium on plant tissue culture. Science Press, Peking, pp 35–41Google Scholar
  7. Kuo CS, Lu WL, Kui YL (1986) Corn (Zea mays L.): production of pure lines through anther culture. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Crops I (Biotechnology agriculture 2) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 168–180Google Scholar
  8. Miao SH, Kuo CS, Kwei YL, Sun AT, Ku SY, Lu WL, Wan YY, Chen ML, Wu MK, Hang L (1978) Induction of pollen plants of maize and observations on their progeny. In: Proceedings of symposium on plant tissue culture. Science Press, Peking, pp 23–33Google Scholar
  9. Nitsch C, Andersen S, Godard M, Neuffer MG, Sheridan WF (1982) Production of haploid plants of Zea mays and Pennisetum through androgenesis. In: Earle ED, Demarly Y (eds) Variability in plants regenerated from tissue culture. Praeger, New York, pp 69–91Google Scholar
  10. Petolino JF, Jones AM (1986) Anther culture of elite genotypes of maize. Crop Sci 26:1072–1074Google Scholar
  11. Petolino JF, Thompson SA (1987) Genetic analysis of anther culture response in maize. Theor Appl Genet 74:284–286Google Scholar
  12. Tsay HS, Miao SH, Widholm JM (1986) Factors affecting haploid plant regeneration from maize anther culture. J Plant Physiol 126:33–40Google Scholar
  13. Wu JL, Zhong LQ, Nong FH, Chen ML, Zhang HY, Zheng BL (1983) Selection of pure line of maize (Zea mays) by anther culture and observation on its hybrids. Sci Sin 26:725–733Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Wan
    • 1
  • J. F. Petolino
    • 2
  • J. M. Widholm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.United Agriseeds, Inc.ChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations