Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 269–273

Interspecific hybrids of Antheraea roylei and A. pernyi — a cytogenetic reassessment

  • J. Nagaraju
  • M. S. Jolly
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Summary

A rare case of interspecific hybridization between the Indian oak feeding silkworm Antheraea roylei (n=31) and Chinese oak feeding silkworm A. pernyi (n=49) yielding fertile and vigorous offspring is reported. The F1 and the backcross (A. roylei X A. pernyi X A. pernyi male individuals of the above cross and the F23 and F32 male offspring derived from an earlier cross between another race of A. roylei (n=30) and A. pernyi (n=49) were cytogenetically analysed in order to study their chromosome dynamics. The F1 hybrids showed 18 trivalents and 13 bivalents in the first meiotic prophase and metaphase. The backcross individuals possessed either 9 trivalents and 31 bivalents or 49 bivalents, in Metaphase I cells. The F23 and F32 individuals were karyotypically alike and exhibited 49 bivalents. The following conclusions were drawn from the above observations: (a) in spite of allopatry and karyotypic divergence in number, a high degree of homology exists between the chromosomal complements of the two species; (b) A. pernyi possibly evolved from A. roylei, during the course of which 18 chromosomes of the latter underwent fission to give rise to the 36 chromosomes of the former. This is demonstrated by trivalent formation and pairing affinities in F1 hybrids; (c) selection has favoured the elimination of large A. roylei chromosomes which participated in trivalent formation in successive generations of inbred hybrids to establish a stable Karyotype like that of A. pernyi.

Key words

Antheraea Interspecific hybrid Trivalents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carothers EE (1941) Interspecific hybridization in the Acrididae (Trimerotropis citrina X T. maritima). Genetics 26:144Google Scholar
  2. Federly H (1939) Geni e chromosomi. Sci Genet 1:186–205Google Scholar
  3. Foot K, Strobell EC (1914) The chromosome of Euschistus variolarius, Euschistus servus and the hybrids of the F1 and F2 generations. Arch Zellforsch 12:485–512Google Scholar
  4. Imai HT (1974) Chromosomes in the Myrmicine ant Leptothorax spinosior. Chromosoma 45:431–444Google Scholar
  5. Jolly MS (1980) Distribution and differentiation in Antheraea species. Proc Int Congr Entomol Jpn 1:1–20Google Scholar
  6. Jolly MS, Narasimhanna MN, Sinha SS, Sen SK (1969) Interspecific hybridization in Antheraea. Indian J Hered 1:45–48Google Scholar
  7. Jolly MS, Sen SK, Prasad GK, Sengupta AK (1979) Some cytological observation on interspecific hybrid of Antheraea pernyi and Antheraea roylei. Cytologia 44:259–263Google Scholar
  8. Kawaguchi E (1928) Zytologische Untersuchungen am Seidenspinner und seinen Verwandten. 1. Gametogenese von Bombyx mori L. und Bombyx mandarina M. und ihrer Bastarole. Z Zellforsch 7:519–552Google Scholar
  9. Veshima N (1963) Chromosome behaviour of the Cimex pilosellus complex (Cimicidae: Hemiptera). Chromosoma 14:511–521Google Scholar
  10. White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Nagaraju
    • 1
  • M. S. Jolly
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Sericultural Research and Training InstituteSriramapuram Mysore South, Mysore, KarnatakaIndia

Personalised recommendations