Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 170–177 | Cite as

The plastome of Citrus. Physical map, variation among Citrus cultivars and species and comparison with related genera

  • R. M. Green
  • A. Vardi
  • E. Galun


A physical plastome map was constructed for Citrus aurantium, and the plastomes of species and cultivars of Citrus and of two Citrus relatives were analysed by Southern blot-hybridisation of labelled total tobacco cpDNA to digests of total Citrus DNA. A resemblance was found between the plastomes of cultivars of C. limon (lemon), C. sinensis (orange), C. aurantium (sour orange), C. paradisii (grapefruit) and C. grandis (pomello). The plastomes of other Citrus types such as mandarin (C. reticulata) and citron (C. medico) differed from each other as well as from the plastomes of the aforementioned group. The plastomes of Poncirus trifoliata and Microcitrus sp. are distinct from each other as well as from the Citrus types.

Key words

Chloroplast DNA Citrus Restriction mapping Plastomes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barret MC, Rhodes AM (1976) A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultivated Citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1:105–136Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Hayyim G, Shani A, Vardi A (1982) Evaluation of isozyme systems in Citrus to facilitate identification of fusion products. Theor Appl Genet 64:1–5Google Scholar
  3. Berthou F, Mathieu C, Vedel F (1983) Chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation as indication of phylogenetic relationships in the genus Coffee L. Theor Appl Genet 65:77–84Google Scholar
  4. Bisaro D, Siegel A (1980) Sequence homology between chloroplast DNAs from several higher plants. Plant Physiol 65:234–237Google Scholar
  5. Bohnert MJ, Loffelharht W (1982) Cyanelle DNA from Cyanophora paradoxa exist in two forms due to intramolecular recombination. FEBS Lett 150:403–406Google Scholar
  6. Dyer TA (1984) The chloroplast genome: its nature and role in development. In: Baker NR, Barber B (eds) Chloroplast biogenesis. Elsevier Amsterdam, pp 30–69Google Scholar
  7. Fluhr R (1983) Molecular genetics of the Nicotiana tabacum chloroplast. PhD Thesis Weizmann Institute of Science, RehovotGoogle Scholar
  8. Fluhr R, Aviv D, Edelman M, Galun E (1983) Cybrids containing mixed and sorted-out chloroplasts following interspecific somatic fusions in Nicotiana. Theor Appl Genet 65:289–294Google Scholar
  9. Frankel R, Scowcroft WR, Whitfeld PR (1979) Chloroplast DNA variation in isonuclear male-sterile lines of Nicotiana. Mol Gen Genet 169:129–135Google Scholar
  10. Galun E, Aviv D (1986) Organelle transfer. In: Weissbach A, Weissbach H (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 118. Academic Press, New York, pp 595–611Google Scholar
  11. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor NY, pp 100–112Google Scholar
  12. McIntosh L, Poulsen C, Bogorad L (1980) Chloroplast gene sequence for the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase of maize. Nature 288:556–560Google Scholar
  13. Miami T, Kishima Y, Sugiura M, Kinoshita T (1984) Chloroplast DNA diversity in the cytoplasms of sugar beet and its related species. Plant Sci Lett 231–235Google Scholar
  14. Palmer JD (1983) Chloroplast DNA exist in two orientations. Nature 301:92–93Google Scholar
  15. Palmer JD, Thompson WF (1981) Rearrangements in the chloroplast genomes of mung bean and pea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:5533–5537Google Scholar
  16. Palmer JD, Singh GP, Pillay DTN (1983) Structure and sequence evolution of three legume chloroplast DNAs. Mol Gen Genet 190:13–19Google Scholar
  17. Palmer JD, Zamir D (1982) Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:5006–5010Google Scholar
  18. Perl-Treves R, Galun E (1985) The Cucumis plastome: physical map, intrageneric variation and phylogenetic relationships. Theor Appl Genet 71:417–429Google Scholar
  19. Rhodes PR, Zhu YS, Kung SD (1981) Nicotiana chloroplast genome. 1. Chloroplast DNA diversity. Mol Gen Genet 182:106–111Google Scholar
  20. Soost RK (1964) Self-incompatibility in Citrus grandis (Linn.) Osbeck. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 84:137–139Google Scholar
  21. Stern DB, Lonsdale DM (1982) Mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes of maize have a 12-kilobase DNA sequence in common. Nature 299:698–702Google Scholar
  22. Stern DB, Palmer JD (1984) Extensive and widespread homologies between mitochondrial DNA and chloroplast DNA in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1946–1950Google Scholar
  23. Swingle WT (1967) The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives. In: Reuther W, Webber MJ, Batchelor LD (eds) The Citrus industry. University of California, pp 190–430Google Scholar
  24. Tanaka T (1969) Misunderstanding with regards Citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull Univ Osaka, Ser B 21:139–145Google Scholar
  25. Timmis JN, Scott NS (1983) Sequence homology between spinach nuclear and chloroplast genomes. Nature 305:65–67Google Scholar
  26. Vardi A, Spiegel-Roy P (1978) Taxonomy, breeding and genetics. Proc Int Soc Citricult 51–57Google Scholar
  27. Vardi A, Spiegel-Roy P, Galun E (1982) Plant regeneration from Citrus protoplasts: variability in methodological requirements among cultivars and species. Theor Appl Genet 62:171–176Google Scholar
  28. Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR (1979) Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzylomethylpaper and rapid hybridization using dextran sulphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2264–2267Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Green
    • 1
  • A. Vardi
    • 2
  • E. Galun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant GeneticsThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Horticulture, Agricultural Research OrganizationThe Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael
  3. 3.Department of BotanyCambridge UniversityCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations