Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 73–79 | Cite as

Host-genotype and agent effects in scrapie incubation: Change in allelic interaction with different strains of agent

  • A. G. Dickinson
  • Veronica M. H. Meikle


Incubation period in mice of ME7 scrapie agent is known to be controlled by the gene sinc. Evidence is presented that the same gene probably also determines incubation period for the 22A scrapie agent which has very different biological properties. Not only is there a reversal of the direction of gene effect when these agents are compared in mice homozygous for two different alleles of sinc, but there is also a different type of allelic interaction—absence of dominance with ME7 and overdominance with 22A. Other agents are mentioned which extend this range of allelic interaction even further. It is suggested that replication of scrapie agent depends on a multimeric host site and that the two alleles of sinc contribute different types of subunits to these sites.


Incubation Period Gene Effect Biological Property Agent Effect Scrapie 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Clarke, M. C., Haig, D. A.: Multiplication of scrapie agent in cell culture. Res. Vet. Sci. 11, 500–501 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. Dickinson, A. G.: Classification of scrapie agents based on histological and incubation period criteria in mice. Proceedings VI Internat. Congr. of Neuropathology, 841–842 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. — Fraser, H.: Genetical control of the concentration of ME7 scrapie agent in mouse spleen. J. comp. Path. 79, 363–366 (1969).Google Scholar
  4. — Meikle, V. M. H.: A comparison of some biological characteristics of the mouse-passaged scrapie agents, 22A and ME7. Genet. Res. 13, 213–225 (1969).Google Scholar
  5. — Fraser, H.: Identification of a gene which controls the incubation period of some strains of scrapie agent in mice. J. comp. Path. 78, 293–299 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, H.: Comparative morphology of ageing and scrapie. Proceedings VI Internat. Congr. of Neuropathology, 897–898 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. — Dickinson, A. G.: Pathogenesis of scrapie in the mouse; the role of the spleen. Nature (Lond.) 226, 462–463 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. Haig, D. A.: Propagation of the scrapie agent in cell culture. Proceedings VI Internat. Congr. of Neuropathology, 856–857 (1970).Google Scholar
  9. Rosenberg, M.: Epigenetic control of lactate dehydrogenase subunit assembly. Nature New Biol. 230, 12–14 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. Zimmermann, F. K., Gundelach, E.: Intragenic complementation, hybrid enzyme formation and dominance in diploid cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molec. gen. Genet. 103, 348–362 (1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Dickinson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Veronica M. H. Meikle
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research OrganisationEdinburgh
  2. 2.Moredun Research InstituteEdinburgh

Personalised recommendations