Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 78, Issue 6, pp 809–817 | Cite as

Allozyme diversity in wild Phaseolus vulgaris: further evidence for two major centers of genetic diversity

  • R. Koenig
  • P. Gepts


Allozyme analysis was performed on 83 wild Phaseolus vulgaris accessions, representing a wide geographical distribution from Mesoamerica to Argentina, to determine levels of genetic diversity and geographic patterns of variability at nine polymorphic isozyme loci. The collection can be divided into two major groups, one consisting of accessions from Mexico, Central America, Colombia and Peru, and the other consisting of accessions from Peru and Argentina. One accession from northern Peru is distinct from the two major groups, and may delineate a transition zone between the two divergent groups. The level of genetic diversity within wild P. vulgaris (Ht=0.132) is comparable with those found in other Phaseolus species. There was no significant within-accession gene diversity (Hs=0.006); however, there is a moderate level of genetic diversity (Dst=0.126) between accessions. Our results are consistent with previous studies on the genetic diversity of wild P. vulgaris using phaseolin, the major seed storage protein of beans.

Key words

Crop evolution Domestication Molecular markers Common bean 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bassiri A, Adams MW (1978a) An electrophoretic survey of seeding isozymes in several Phaseolus species. Euphytica 27:447–459Google Scholar
  2. Bassiri A, Adams MW (1978b) Evaluation of common bean cultivar relationships by means of isozyme electrophoretic patterns. Euphytica 27:707–720Google Scholar
  3. Brewer GJ (1970) Introduction to isozyme techniques. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown AHD (1979) Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor Popul Biol 15:1–42Google Scholar
  5. Brücher H (1988) The wild ancestor of Phaseolus vulgaris in the Andes. In: Gepts P (ed) Genetic resources, domestication and evolution of phaseolus beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 185–214Google Scholar
  6. Burkart A (1941) Sobre la existencia de razas silvestres de Phaseolus vulgaris. Resol y Trab I Reun Argent Agron, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  7. Burkart A (1943) Las leguminosas argentinas silvestres y cultivadas. Acme, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardy BJ, Stuber CW, Goodman MM (1980) Techniques for starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes from maize (Zea mays L.) Department of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 1317, North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar
  9. Delgado A, Bonet A, Gepts P (1988) The wild ancestor of Phaseolus vulgaris in Mexico. In: Gepts P (ed) Genetic resources, domestication and evolution of Phaseolus beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 163–184Google Scholar
  10. Gentry HS (1969) Origin of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Econ Bot 23:55–69Google Scholar
  11. Gepts P (1987) Characterizing plant phenology: Growth and development scales. In: Wisiol K, Hesketh J (eds) Plant growth modeling for resource management, vol II, Quantifying plant processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  12. Gepts P (1988) Phaseolin as an evolutionary marker. In: Gepts P (ed) Genetic resources, domestication and evolution of Phaseolus beans. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 215–241Google Scholar
  13. Gepts P, Bliss FA (1985) F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean: Differential geographic origin suggests two gene pools in cultivated germplasm. J Hered 76:447–450Google Scholar
  14. Gepts P, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin variability among wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) from Colombia. Econ Bot 40:469–478Google Scholar
  15. Gepts P, Osborn TC, Rashka K, Bliss FA (1986) Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris); evidence for multiple centers of domestication. Econ Bot 40:451–468Google Scholar
  16. Gottlieb LD (1981) Electrophoretic evidence in plant populations. Prog Phytochem 7:1–46Google Scholar
  17. Hamrick JL (1983) The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural plant populations. In: Schonewald-Cox CM, Chambers SM, MacBryde B, Thomas L (eds) Genetics and conservation. Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, pp 335–448Google Scholar
  18. Hamrick JL, Linhart YB, Mitton JB (1979) Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:173–200Google Scholar
  19. Jaaska V, Jaaska V (1988) Isoenzyme variation in the genera Phaseolus and Vigna (Fabaceae) in relation to their systematics: Aspartate aminotransferase and superoxide dismutase. Plant Syst Evol 159:145–159Google Scholar
  20. Koenig R, Gepts P (1989) Segregation and linkage of genes for seed proteins, isozymes, and morphological traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Hered (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Koenig R, Singh S, Gepts P (1990) Novel phaseolin types in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ Bot (in press)Google Scholar
  22. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL (1984) Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:65–95Google Scholar
  23. McBryde FW (1947) Cultural and historical geography of southwest Guatemala. Smithsonian Institute, Inst. Soc Anthrop Publ 4:35, 75–76, 134–135Google Scholar
  24. Miranda Colín S (1967) Origen de Phaseolus vulgaris L. (frijol común). Agrociencia 1:99–109Google Scholar
  25. Miranda Colín S (1979) Evolución de Phaseolus vulgaris y P. coccineus. In: Engleman M (ed) Contribuciones al conocimiento del frijol (Phaseolus) en México. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, pp 227Google Scholar
  26. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323Google Scholar
  27. Selander RK, Smith MH, Yang SY, Johnson WE, Gentry JB (1971) Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus I. Variation in the old field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). University Texas Publishers 7103:49–90Google Scholar
  28. Shaw CR, Prasad R (1970) Starch gel electrophoresis a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4:297–320Google Scholar
  29. Singh SP, Gutierrez AJ (1984) Geographical distribution of the DL1 and DL2 genes causing hybrid dwarfism in Phaseolus vulgaris L., their association with seed size, and their significance to breeding. Euphytica 33:337–45Google Scholar
  30. Sneath PHA, Sokal R (1973) Numerical taxonomy. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  31. Sprecher SL (1988) Allozyme differentiation between gene pools in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), with special reference to Malawian germplasm. PhD thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing (UMI, Diss. Inform. Serv. 8900102)Google Scholar
  32. Vallejos E (1983) Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds) Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 469–516Google Scholar
  33. Wall JR, Wall SW (1975) Isozyme polymorphisms in the study of evolution in the Phaseolus vulgaris-P. coccineus complex of Mexico. In: Market CL (ed) Isozymes IV. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Weeden NF (1984a) Linkage between the gene coding for the small unit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase and the gene coding for malic enzyme in Phaseolus vulgaris. Annu Rep Bean Impr Coop 27:123–124Google Scholar
  35. Weeden NF (1984b) Distinguishing among white-seeded bean cultivars by means of allozyme genotypes. Euphytica 33:199–208Google Scholar
  36. Weeden NF (1986) Genetic confirmation that the variation in the zymograms of 3 enzyme systems is produced by allelic polymorphism. Annu Rep Bean Impr Coop 29:117–118Google Scholar
  37. Weeden NF, Liang CY (1985) Detection of a linkage between flower color and Est-2 in common bean. Annu Rep Bean Impr Coop 27:87–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Koenig
    • 1
  • P. Gepts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agronomy and Range ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations