Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 229, Issue 1, pp 57–66 | Cite as

A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • M. Koornneef
  • C. J. Hanhart
  • J. H. van der Veen


Monogenic mutants of the early ecotype Landsberg erecta were selected on the basis of late flowering under long day (LD) conditions after treatment with ethyl methanesulphonate or irradiation. In addition to later flowering the number of rosette and cauline leaves is proportionally higher in all mutants, although the correlation coefficient between the two parameters is not the same for all genotypes. Forty-two independently induced mutants were found to represent mutations at 11 loci. The mutations were either recessive, intermediate (co locus) or almost completely dominant (fwa locus). The loci are located at distinct positions on four of the five Arabidopsis chromosomes. Recombinants carrying mutations at different loci flower later than or as late as the later parental mutant. This distinction led to the assignment of eight of the loci to three epistatic groups. In wild type, vernalization promotes flowering to a small extent. For mutants at the loci fca, fve, fy and fpa, vernalization has a large effect both under LD and short day (SD) conditions, whereas co, gi, fd and fwa mutants are almost completely insensitive to this treatment. SD induces later flowering except for mutants at the co and gi loci, which flower with the same number of leaves under LD and SD conditions. This differential response of the mutants to environmental factors and their subdivision into epistatic groups is discussed in relation to a causal model for floral initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Key words

Arabidopsis Flowering Vernalization Photoperiodism Linkage map 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Besnard-Wibaut C (1977) Histoautoradiographic analysis of the thermoinductive processes in the shoot apex of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh, vernalized at different stages of development. Plant Cell Physiol 18:949–962Google Scholar
  2. Besnard-Wibaut C (1981) Effectiveness of gibberellins and 6-benzyladenine on flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol Plant 53:205–212Google Scholar
  3. Bleecker AB, Estelle MA, Somerville CR, Kende H (1988) Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241:1086–1089Google Scholar
  4. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1989) Genes directing flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1:37–52Google Scholar
  5. Finkelstein R, Estelle MA, Martinez-Zapater JM, Somerville CR (1988) Arabidopsis as a tool for the identification of genes involved in plant development. In: Verma DPS, Goldberg RB (eds) Temporal and Spatial Regulation of Plant Genes, Plant Gene Research, vol 5. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  6. Guzman P, Ecker JR (1990) Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell 2:513–523Google Scholar
  7. Hirono Y, Rédei GP (1965) Induced premeiotic exchange of linked markers in the angiosperm Arabidopsis. Genetics 51:519–526Google Scholar
  8. Hussein HAS (1968) Genetic analysis of mutagen-induced flowering time variation in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn. PhD thesis, Meded Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 68 (11) pp 88Google Scholar
  9. Irish VF, Sussex IM (1990) Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell 2:741–753Google Scholar
  10. Jensen J, Jörgensen JH (1975) The barley chromosome 5 linkage map. I. Literature survey and map estimation procedure. Hereditas 80:5–16Google Scholar
  11. Jones ME (1971) The population genetics of Arabidopsis thaliana. III. The effect of vernalisation. Heredity 27:59–72Google Scholar
  12. Karlovská V (1974) Genotypic control of the speed of development in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn. lines obtained from natural populations. Biol Plantar 16:107–117Google Scholar
  13. Koornneef M (1990) Arabidopsis thaliana. In: O'Brien SJ (ed) Genetic Maps. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 6.94–6.97Google Scholar
  14. Koornneef M, Stam P (1988) Procedures for mapping by using F2 and F3 populations, Arabidopsis Inform Serv 25:35–40Google Scholar
  15. Koornneef M, Dellaert LWM, van der Veen JH (1982a) EMS- and radiation-induced mutation frequencies at individual loci in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Mutat Res 93:109–123Google Scholar
  16. Koornneef M, Jorna ML, Brinkhorst-van der Swan DLC, Karssen CM (1982b) The isolation of abscisic acid (ABA)-deficient mutants by selection of induced revertants in non-germinating gibberellin-sensitive lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn. Theor Appl Genet 61:385–393Google Scholar
  17. Koornneef M, van Eden J, Hanhart CJ, Stam P, Braaksma FJ, Feenstra WJ (1983) Linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Hered 74:265–272Google Scholar
  18. Laibach F (1951) Über sommer- und winterannualle Rassen von Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Ein Beitrag zur Ätiologie der Blütenbildung. Beitr Biol Pflanzen 28:173–210Google Scholar
  19. Langridge J (1957) Effect of day-length and gibberellic acid on the flowering of Arabidopsis. Nature 180:36–37Google Scholar
  20. Martinez-Zapater JM, Somerville CR (1990) Effect of light quality and vernalization on late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 92:770–776Google Scholar
  21. McKelvie AD (1962) A list of mutant genes in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Radiat Bot 1:233–241Google Scholar
  22. Murfet IC (1985) Pisum sativum L. In: Halevy AH (ed) Handbook of flowering, vol IV. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 97–126Google Scholar
  23. Murfet IC (1989) Flowering genes in Pisum. In: Lord E, Bernier G (eds) Plant reproduction: from floral induction to pollination. Am Soc Plant Physiol, Maryland, pp 10–18Google Scholar
  24. Napp-Zinn K (1957) Untersuchungen zur Genetik des Kältebedürf-nisses bei Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl 88:253–285Google Scholar
  25. Napp-Zinn K (1969) Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. In: Evans LT (ed) The induction of flowering: Some case histories. MacMillan, Melbourne, pp 291–304Google Scholar
  26. Napp-Zinn K (1985) Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Halevy HA (ed) Handbook of flowering, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 492–503Google Scholar
  27. Poethig RS (1988) A non-cell-autonomous mutation regulating juvenility in maize. Nature 336:82–83Google Scholar
  28. Poethig RS (1990) Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science 250:923–930Google Scholar
  29. Rédei GP (1962) Supervital mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics 47:443–460Google Scholar
  30. Rédei GP, Hirono Y (1964) Linkage studies, Arabidopsis Inform Serv 1:9–10Google Scholar
  31. Rédei GP, Acedo G, Gavazzi G (1974) Flower differentiation in Arabidopsis. Stadler Symp 6:135–168Google Scholar
  32. Reid JB, Murfet IC (1984) Flowering in Pisum: A fifth locus, veg. Ann Bot 53:369–382Google Scholar
  33. Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2:755–767Google Scholar
  34. Van der Veen JH (1965) Genes for late flowering in Arabidopsis. In: Röbbelen G (ed) Arabidopsis Research (Symposium Göttingen). Gerd Wasmund and Co, Gelsenkirchen, pp 162–171Google Scholar
  35. Vaughan JG (1955) The morphology and growth of the vegetative and reproductive apices of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn., Capsella bursa pastoris (L.) Medic and Anagallis arvensis L. J Linn Soc Lond Bot 55:279–300Google Scholar
  36. Vetrilova M (1973) Genetic and physiological analysis of induced late mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Biol Plantar 15:391–397Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Koornneef
    • 1
  • C. J. Hanhart
    • 1
  • J. H. van der Veen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations