Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 3–10 | Cite as

Genotypic variability for callus formation and plant regeneration in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

  • T. Abe
  • Y. Futsuhara
Originals

Summary

Sixty rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.), belonging to three subspecies, japonica, indica and javanica (some japonicaXindica hybrids were included), were compared for their capacity for callus growth and plant regeneration. Tissue cultures initiated from mature seeds on Murashige and Skoog's (1962) medium with 2 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) were transferred to a medium containing 0.02 mg/l 2,4-D and 10 mg/l kinetin, from which plantlets were regenerated. Large variabilities in callus growth and plant regeneration potentials were revealed among the varieties tested. Most japonica varieties formed a callus that weighed more than 100 mg per seed 30 days after inoculation, and showed a relatively high regenerative potential, whereas indica varieties, japonica-indica hybrids and javanica varieties showed poor callus growth and plant regeneration, although considerable varietal variation was observed in each subspecies. The callus growth potential was not correlated with the plant regeneration potential. Histological observations revealed that the epithelium cells of the scutellum mainly proliferated to form a callus, from which shoot and root primordia were differentiated independently from each other. The shoot primordia developed into plantlets when roots were formed adventitiously. In a few cases, shoots and roots were bilaterally initiated from a single primordium.

Key words

Oryza sativa L. Callus growth Genotypic variability Organogenesis Plant regeneration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe T, Futsuhara Y (1984) Varietal difference of plant regeneration from root callus tissues in rice. Jpn J Breed 34:147–155Google Scholar
  2. Abe T, Sasahara T (1982) Variation in callus formation from seeds in japonica, indica, their hybrids, and large grain varieties in rice. Jpn J Breed 32:53–60Google Scholar
  3. Cornejo-Martin MJ, Mingo-Castel AM, Primo-Millo E (1979) Organ redifferentiation in rice callus: effects of CO2 and cytokinins. Z Pflanzenphysiol 94:117–123Google Scholar
  4. Foroughi-Wehr B, Friedt W, Wenzel G (1982) on the genetic improvement of androgenetic haploid formation in Hordeum vulgare L. Theor Appl Genet 62:233–239Google Scholar
  5. Futsuhara Y (1968) Breeding of new rice variety, ‘Reimei’ by gamma-ray irradiation. Gamma Field Symp 7:87–109Google Scholar
  6. Henke RR, Mansur MR, Contantin MJ (1978) Organogenesis and plantlet formation from organ and seedling-derived calli of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Plant 44:11–14Google Scholar
  7. Heyser JW, Dykes TA, Demott KJ, Nobors NW (1983) High frequency, long term regeneration on rice from callus cultures. Plant Sci Lett 29:175–181Google Scholar
  8. Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137AGoogle Scholar
  9. Maeda E (1965) Callus formation and isolation of single cells from rice seedlings. Proc Crop Soc Japan 34:139–147Google Scholar
  10. Maeda E (1967) Varietal differences in callus formation of rice seeds under sterile culture. Proc Crop Soc Japan 36:233–239Google Scholar
  11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
  12. Nishi T, Yamada Y, Takahashi E (1973) The role of auxin in differentiation of rice tissue cultured in vitro. Bot Mag 86:183–188Google Scholar
  13. Nishimura S, Maeda E (1977) Histological studies of callus induction in rice seed. Jpn J Crop Sci 46:275–285Google Scholar
  14. Saka H, Maeda E (1969) Effect of kinetin on organ formation in callus tissue derived from rice embryos. Proc Crop Soc Japan 38:668–674Google Scholar
  15. Sundaru M, Baba I, Tanabe T, Tamai F, Motoda Y (1983) Varietal difference of indonesian rice plants in their susceptibility to 2,4-D injury and interrelationships with Ethylene. Jpn J Crop Sci 52:323–330Google Scholar
  16. Vasil V, Vasil IK (1982) The ontogeny of somatic embryos of Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum. 1. In cultured immature embryos. Bot Gaz 143:454–465Google Scholar
  17. Yamada Y, Tanaka K, Takahashi E (1967) Callus induction in rice, Oryza sativa L. Proc Jpn Acad 43:156–160Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Abe
    • 1
  • Y. Futsuhara
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Theory of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of AgricultureNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations