, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 177–191 | Cite as

The objective rating of oral-motor functions during feeding

  • Sheena Reilly
  • David Skuse
  • Berenice Mathisen
  • Dieter Wolke


The Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA) was developed to record oral-motor skills objectively in infants between ages 8 and 24 months postnatal. Its aim is to identify areas of dysfunction that could contribute to feeding difficulties. The procedure takes approximately 20 min to administer, and is intended to be rated largely from a videorecording of a structured feeding session. A series of foodstuffs of varying textures, including liquids, is presented to the child in a standardized manner. Oral-motor skills are evaluated in terms of discrete oral-motor movements. The schedule distinguishes these from skills at more aggregated levels of functioning such as jaw, lip, and tongue control. A total of 127 children have been studied with the instrument, including normal healthy infants and samples with nonorganic failure to thrive, and cerebral palsy. Interrater and test-retest reliabilities were determined on a subset of 10 infants who each took part in three trials rated by 2 therapists. Excellent levels of interrater reliability (kappa >0.75) were obtained for the presence/absence of 69% of discrete oral-motor behaviors. Test-retest reliability was similarly excellent for 85% of ratable behaviors. For the first time an assessment of oral-motor functioning has been shown to have adequate reliability for children aged 8–24 months. The validation of the SOMA on a large sample of normally developing infants and its application to clinical groups is presented in an accompanying paper [1].

Key words

Dysphagia Oral-motor skills Feeding Infancy Assessment Deglutition Deglutition disorders 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Skuse D, Stevenson J, Reilly S, Mathisen B: Schedule for Oral Motor Assessment (SOMA): methods of validation. Dysphagia 10:192–202, 1995Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dodds WJ: The physiology of swallowing. Dysphagia 3:171–178, 1989Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palmer JB: Electromyography of the muscles of oropharyngeal swallowing: basic concepts. Dysphagia 3:192–198, 1989Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leopold NA, Kagel MC: Swallowing ingestion and dysphagia: a reappraisal. Arch Phys Med Rehab 64:371–373, 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Logemann J: Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. San Diego: College Hill Press, 1983Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller AJ: Deglutition. Physiol Rev 62:120–184, 1982Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenny DJ, Koheil RM, Greenberg J, Reid D, Milner M, Moran R, Judd PL: Development of a multidisciplinary feeding profile for children who are dependent feeders. Dysphagia 4:16–28, 1989Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skuse D, Wolke D, Reilly S: Failure to thrive. Clinical and developmental aspects. In: Remschmidt H, Schmidt M (eds.): Child and Youth Psychiatry. European Perspectives, Vol. II: Developmental Psychopathology. Gottingen: Hogrefe and Huber, 1992, pp 46–71Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathisen B, Skuse D, Wolke D, Reilly S: Oral-motor dysfunction and failure to thrive amongst inner-city children. Dev Med Child Neurol 31:293–302, 1989Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reilly S, Skuse D: Characteristics and management of feeding problems in young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:379–388, 1992Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomessen M, Heiberg A, Kase BF, Larsen S, Riis G: Feeding problems, height and weight in different groups of disabled children. Acta Paed Scand 80:527–533, 1991aGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomessen M, Riis G, Fronde Kase B, Larsen S, Heiberg A: Energy and nutrient intakes of disabled children: do feeding problems make a difference? J Am Diet Assoc Res 91:1522–1525, 1991bGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patrick J, Gisel E: Nutrition for the feeding-impaired child. J Neurol Rehab 4:115–119, 1990Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denoff E: Current status of infant stimulation or enrichment programs for children with developmental disabilities. Pediatrics 67:32–37, 1981Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmer S, Thompson RJ, Linscheid TR: Applied behaviour analysis in the treatment of childhood feeding problems. Dev Med Child Neurol 17:333–339, 1975Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gisel E, Patrick J: Identification of children unable to maintain a normal nutritional state. Lancet i:283–286, 1988Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gisel E: Development of oral side preference during chewing and its relation to hand preference in normal 2–8-year-old children. Am J Occup Ther 42:378–383, 1988aGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gisel E: Chewing cycles in 2–8-year-old normal children: a developmental profile. Am J Occup Ther 42:40–46, 1988bGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gisel E: Effect of food texture on the development of chewing of children between 6 months and 2 years of age. Dev Med Child Neurol 33:69–79, 1991Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stolovitz P, Gisel EG: Circumoral movements in response to three different food textures in children 6 months to 2 years of age. Dysphagia 6:17–25, 1991Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dworkin JP, Culatta RA: Dworkin-Culatta Oral Mechanism Examination. Nicholasville, KY: Edgewood Press, 1980Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Price GJ, Jones CJ, Charlton RA, Allen C: A combined approach to the assessment of neurological dysphagia. Clin Otolaryngol 12:197–201, 1987Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Enderby PM, Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press, 1983Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adran GM, Kemp FH, Lind J: A cineradiographic view of breast feeding. Br J Radiol 31:156–162, 1958Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Doty RW, Bosma JF: An electromyographic analysis of reflux deglutition. J Neurophysiol 19:44–60, 1956Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bosma JF: Deglutition: pharyngeal stage. Physiol Rev 37:275–300, 1957Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weber F, Woolridge MW, Baum JD: An ultrasonographic study of the organisation of sucking and swallowing by newborn infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 28:19–24, 1986Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolff PH: The serial organisation of sucking in the young infant. Pediatrics 42:943–956, 1968Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kron R, Stein M, Goddard K: A method of measuring sucking behavior of newborn infants. Psychosom Med 25:181–191, 1963Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brazelton TB: Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (Clinics in Developmental Medicine, series no 50). Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1973Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dreier T, Wolff PH, Cross EE, Cochran WD: Patterns of breath intervals during non-nutritive sucking in full-term and ‘at-risk’ preterm infants with normal neurological examinations. Early Hum Dev 3:187–199, 1979Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hill A, Volpe JJ: Disorders of sucking and swallowing in the newborn infant: clinicopathologic correlations. Progress in Perinatal Neurology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, pp 157–181, 1981Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Casaer P, Daniels H, Devlieger J, DeCock P, Eggermont E: Feeding behaviour in preterm neonates. Early Hum Dev 7:331–366, 1982Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leaf JP, Gisel EG: Neonatal sucking behavior: a quick method of evaluation through structured visual observation. Phys Occup Ther Ped 6:27–37, 1986Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Braun MA, Palmer MM: A pilot study of oral motor dysfunction in ‘at risk’ infants. Phys Occup Ther Ped 5:13–25, 1985Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Weathers RM, Becker M, Geniesser N: Improved technique for study of swallowing function in infants. Radiol Tech 46:98, 1974Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Selley WG, Ellis RE, Flack FC, Brooks WA: Coordination of sucking, swallowing and breathing in the newborn: its relationship to infant feeding and normal development. Br J Dis Comm 25:311–327, 1990Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vice FL, Heinz JM, Giuriati G, Hood M, Bosma JF: Cervical ausculation of suckle feeding in newborn infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 32:760–768, 1991Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vulpe SF: Vulpe Assessment Battery for the Atypical Child. Toronto, Ontario: National Institute on Mental Retardation, 1969Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Campbell PH: Assessing oral-motor skills in severely handicapped persons: an analysis of normal and abnormal patterns of movement. In: York R, Edgar E (eds.): Teaching the Severely Handicapped. Seattle, WA: Association for the Severely Handicapped, pp 39–63, 1979Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sleight D, Niman C: Gross Motor and Oral Motor Development in Children with Down Syndrome: Birth Through Three Years. St. Louis, MO: Association for Retarded Citizens Inc, 1984Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Morris S (ed.): The Normal Acquisition of Oral Feeding Skills: Implications for Assessment and Treatment. New York: Therapeutic Media, 1982Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stratton M: Behavioral assessment scale of oral functions in feeding. Am J Occup Ther 35:719–721, 1981Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheppard JJ: Assessment of oral motor behaviors in cerebral palsy. Semin Speech Lang 8:57–70, 1987Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ogg HL: Oral pharyngeal development and evaluation. Phys Ther 55:235–241, 1975Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lewis JA: Oral motor assessment and treatment of feeding difficulties. In: Accardo P (ed.): Failure to Thrive in Infancy and Early Childhood—A Multidisciplinary Team Approach. Baltimore: University Park Press, pp 265–295, 1972Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Berk RA, DeGangi GA: Technical considerations in the evaluation of pediatric motor scales. Am J Occup Ther 33:240–244, 1979Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ottenbacher K, Dauck BS, Grahn V, Gevelinger M, Hassett C: Reliability of the behavioral assessment scale of oral functions in feeding. Am J Occup Ther 39:436–440, 1985Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mathisen B, Reilly S, Skuse D: Oral motor dysfunction and feeding disorders in infants with the Turner syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:141–149, 1992Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sonies BC, Ekman EV, Andersson HC, Adamson MD, Kaler SG, Markello TC, Gahl WA: Swallowing dysfunction in nephropathic cystinosis. N Engl J Med 323:565–570, 1990Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hamill PVV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF, Moore WM: NCHS Growth Curves for Children: Birth-18 Years. Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics, 1977; DHEW Publication no (PHS)78-1650. Vital and Health Statistics: Series 11; no 65, 1977Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morris SE, Klein MD: Pre-Feeding Skills: A Comprehensive Resource for Feeding Development. Arizona: Therapy Skill Builders, 1987Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Stevenson RD, Allaire JH: The development of normal feeding and swallowing. Pediatr Clin N Am 38:1439–1453, 1991Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fomon SJ, Filer LJ, Anderson TA, Ziegler E. Recommendations for feeding normal infants. Pediatrics 63:1, 1979Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pridham KF: Feeding behavior of 6 to 12 month old infants: assessment and sources of parental information. J Pediatr 117:174–180, 1990Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bartko J, Carpenter WT: On the methods and theory of reliability. J Nerv Ment Dis 163:307–312, 1976Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cohen L, Holliday M: Statistics for Social Scientists: An Introductory Text with Computer Programmes in Basic. London: Harper and Row, 1982Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174, 1977Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gisel EG, Schwaab L, Lange-Stemmler L, Niman CW, Schwartz JL: Lateralisation of tongue movements during eating in children 2–5 years old. Am J Occup Ther 40:265–270, 1986Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Splaingard M, Hutchins B, Sulton D, Chaudhuro J: Aspiration in rehabilitation patents: videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehab 69:637–640, 1988Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dowdney L, Woodward L, Pickles A, Skuse D: The body image perception and attitude scale for children: reliability in growth retarded and community comparison subjects. Int J Method Psychiat Res 4:1161–1162Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheena Reilly
    • 1
  • David Skuse
    • 1
  • Berenice Mathisen
    • 2
  • Dieter Wolke
    • 3
  1. 1.Behavioural Sciences UnitInstitute of Child HealthLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Speech and HearingUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Bavarian Longitudinal StudyUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations