Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 76, Issue 4, pp 593–600 | Cite as

Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs)

2. Preliminary analysis of subspecies within B. rapa (syn. campestris) and B. oleracea
  • K. M. Song
  • T. C. Osborn
  • P. H. Williams
Originals

Summary

Preliminary analysis using nuclear RFLPs provided evidence that subspecies within Brassica rapa originated from two different centers. One center is in Europe, represented by turnip and turnip rape from which the oilseed sarson was derived. A second center is in South China containing a variety of Chinese vegetables of which pak choi and narinosa seem to be the most ancient forms. Based on RFLP data, the accessions of B. oleracea examined could be divided into three distinct groups, represented by thousand head kale, broccoli and cabbage. Thousand head kale and Chinese kale appear to be the primitive types. Observations of parallel variation among subspecies of both species are discussed.

Key words

Brassica rapa Brassica oleracea Molecular taxonomy Phylogenetic tree Restriction fragment length polymorphism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crisp P (1982) The use of an evolutionary scheme for cauli-flowers in the screening of genetic resources. Euphytica 31:725–734Google Scholar
  2. Figdore SS, Kenard W, Song KM, Slocum MK, Osborn TC (1988) Assessment of the degree of restriction fragment length polymorphism in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 75:833–840Google Scholar
  3. Fitch WM, Margoliash E (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155:279–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gray AR (1982) Taxonomy and evolution of broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica). Econ Bot 36:397–410Google Scholar
  5. Helm J (1963) Morphologisch-taxonomische Gliederung der Kultursippen von Brassica oleracea L. Kulturpflanze 11:92–210Google Scholar
  6. Li CW (1980) The origin, evolution, taxonomy and hybridization of Chinese cabbage. In:Talekar NS, Griggs TD (eds) Chinese Cabbage. Asian Vegetable Research Center, Taiwan, RO China, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  7. Mithen RF, Lewis BG, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR (1987) Glucosinolates of wild and cultivated Brassica species. Phytochemistry 26:1969–1973Google Scholar
  8. Nieuwhof M (1969) Cole Crops. In: Polunin N (ed) Leonard Hill Book, London, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  9. Osborn TC, Alexander DC, Fobes JF (1987) Identification of restriction fragment length polymorphisms linked to genes controlling soluble solids content in tomato fruit. Theor Appl Genet 73:350–356Google Scholar
  10. Prakash S, Hinata K (1980) Taxonomy, cytogenetics and origin of crop Brassica, a review. Opera Bot 55:1–57Google Scholar
  11. Snogerup S (1980) The wild forms of the Brassica oleracea group (2n=18) and their possible relations to the cultivated ones. In:Tsunoda S, Hinata K, Gomez-Campo C (eds) Brassica Crops and Wild Allies. Jpn Sci Soc Press, Tokyo, pp 121–132Google Scholar
  12. Song KM, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLPs). 1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphidiploid species. Theor Appl Genet 75:784–794Google Scholar
  13. Vaughan JG (1977) A multidisciplinary study of the taxonomy and origin of Brassica crops. BioScience 27:35–40Google Scholar
  14. Zeven AC, Ramanna MS, Boeder M, Sawor Z, Waninge J (1988) Diploids and natural autotetraploids in the predominantly vegetatively propagated Brassica oleracea L. var ramosa DC and their cytology. Euphytica (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. C. Osborn
    • 2
  • P. H. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations