Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 391–444 | Cite as

Inductive inference from theory laden data

  • Kevin T. Kelly
  • Clark Glymour


Inductive Inference Lade Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Angluin D.: 1980, ‘Inductive Inference of Formal Languages from Positive Data’Informations and Control 45, 117–135.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Angluin, D. and C. Smith, “A Survey of Inductive Inference Methods”, Technical Report 250, Yale University (October 1982).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Blumer A., A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler and M. Warmuth: 1987,Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension, Research Report UCSC-CRL-87–20, Dept. of Computer Science, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Feyerabend, P. K.: 1980, “How to be a Good Empiricist”, inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, ed., 164–193.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Gaifman H. and M. Snir: 1982, “Probabilities over Rich Languages. Testing and Randomness”,Journal of Symbolic Logic,47:3.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Gold E. M.: 1965, “Limiting Recursion”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 30, 27–48.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gold E. M.: 1967, “Language Identification in the Limit”,Information and Control 10, 447–474.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Goodman N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Halmos P. R.: 1970,Measure Theory, New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hanson N. R.: 1965,Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kelly K. and C. Glymour: 1989, “Convergence to the Truth and Nothing but the Truth”,Philosophy of Science 56: 2.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Kelly K. and C. Glymour: 1990, “Theory Discovery from Data with Mixed Quantifiers”,Journal of Phiosophical Logic 19, 1–33.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kuhn T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Laudan, L.: 1980, “Why was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?”, inScientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality, T. Nickles, (ed.).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Osherson D., and S. Weinstein: 1989, “Paradigms of Truth Detection”,Journal of Philosophical Logic,18, 1–42.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Osherson D., M. Stob, and S. Weinstein: 1986,Systems that Learn, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Putnam H.: 1963 “‘Degree of Confirmation’ and inductive Logic”, inThe Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap, A. Schilpp (ed.), Lasalle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Putnam H.: 1965, “Trial and Error Predicates and a Solution to a Problem of Mostowski”,Journal of Symbolic Logic 30: 1, 49–57.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Quine, W. V. O.: 1980, “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, (ed.).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Rorty R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Sellars, W.: 1980, “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”, inChallenges to Empiricism, Harold Morick, (ed.), 95–107.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Valiant L.: 1984, “A theory of the Learnable”,Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 27, 1134–1142.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin T. Kelly
    • 1
  • Clark Glymour
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations