Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 219–241 | Cite as

The logic of paradox

  • Graham Priest


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D., Entailment, Princeton U.P. (1975).Google Scholar
  2. AsenjoF. G., ‘A Calculus of Antinomies’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XV (1966), 497–509, VII, 103–105.Google Scholar
  3. CurryH. B., ‘The Inconsistency of Certain Formal Logics’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (1942), 115–117.Google Scholar
  4. daCostaN., ‘On the Theory of Inconsistent Formal Systems’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XV (1974), 497–509.Google Scholar
  5. DunnJ. M., ‘Intuitive Semantics for First-Degree Entailments, and “Coupled Trees”’, Philosophical Studies 29 (1976), 149–168.Google Scholar
  6. vanFraassenB., ‘Presupposition Implication and Self Reference’, Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), 136–52.Google Scholar
  7. FraenkelA., Bar HillelY. and LevyA., Foundations of Set Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. GödelK., ‘What is Cantor's Continuum Problem’, American Mathematical Monthly 54 (1947), 515–25. Reprinted in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, Blackwell, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Hilbert, D. and Bernays, P., Grundlagen der Mathematik Vol. II, Springer Verlag, 1939.Google Scholar
  10. KleeneS. C., Metamathematics, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1952.Google Scholar
  11. Lukasiewicz, J., ‘On 3-valued Logic’ (1920) in S. McCall Polish Logic, Oxford U.P., 1967.Google Scholar
  12. Priest, G., ‘Type Theory in which Variables Range Over Predicates’, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. Routley, R., ‘Ultralogic as Universal’, Relevance Logic Newsletter 2 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. RoutleyR. and RoutleyV., ‘The Semantics of First Degree Entailment’, Nous VI (1972), 335–359.Google Scholar
  15. TarskiA., ‘Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen’, Studia Philosophica 1 (1936), 266–405. Reprinted in English in Logic Semantics and Metamathematics, Oxford U.P., 1956.Google Scholar
  16. TarskiA., ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, Philosophy and Phenomological Research 4 (1944), 341–376. Reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.), Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illinois, 1952.Google Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Remarks, Blackwell, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Priest
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations