Irrigation Science

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 167–176

Plant indicators of wheat and soybean crop water stress

  • W. S. Meyer
  • G. C. Green


The onset of water stress within a crop is defined as the time at which the rate of water loss declines below that of a well watered crop in the same locality. The relation to the onset of water stress and soil water status of several readily measured plant parameters was investigated in crops of wheat and soybeans over three years. Evapotranspiration ET was monitored with weighing lysimeters. A noticeable decline in the rate of ET for both wheat and soybeans was detected once 20% to 30% of the total plant available water PAW remained in the 1 m deep lysimeter soil profile. Extension growth of wheat declined when PAW was 33% and 34% in two years of measurement. In soybeans, the decline in the rate of leaf extension coincided with the decline in the rate of ET. Midmorning measurement of exposed leaf water potential ψL, covered leaf water potential ψCL and covered plant leaf water potential ψCP yielded similar results for both wheat and soybeans. Day-to-day variability was least in ψCP and most in ψL. Values of ψCP, ψL and ψCL decreased rapidly with PAW < 30%. Daily values of leaf diffusive conductance were variable but there was a general decline in conductance with PAW < 30%. It is suggested that ψCL may be the easiest and most reliable parameter to monitor as a means of detecting the onset of stress. The results indicated that PAW levels in the root zone of 50% for wheat and 30% for soybean probably do not affect extension growth or plant water status parameters and can thus be used as criteria for irrigation scheduling.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Begg JE, Turner NC (1976) Crop water deficits. Adv Agron 28:161Google Scholar
  2. Biscoe PV, Cohen Y, Wallace JS (1976) Community water relations. Daily and seasonal changes of water potential in cereals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 273:565Google Scholar
  3. Burch GJ (1979) Soil and plant resistances to water absorption by plant root systems. Aust J Agric Res 30:279Google Scholar
  4. Cutler JM, Rains DW (1977) Effect of irrigation history on responses of cotton to subsequent water stress. Crop Sci 17:329Google Scholar
  5. Davies WJ (1977) Stomatal responses to water stress and light in plants grown in controlled environments and in the field. Crop Sci 17:735Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher JN (1979) Field studies of cereal leaf growth. II. The relation between auxanometer and dissection measurements of leaf extension and their relation to crop leaf area expansion. J Exp Bot 30:637Google Scholar
  7. Gallagher JN, Biscoe PV, Wallace JS (1979) Field studies of cereal leaf growth. IV. Winter wheat leaf extensions in relation to temperature and leaf water status. J Exp Bot 30:657Google Scholar
  8. Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 24:519Google Scholar
  9. Hutson J, Green GC, Meyer WS (1980) A weighing lysimeter facility at Roodeplaat for crop evapotranspiration studies. Water SA 6:41Google Scholar
  10. Jensen ME, Wright JL, Pratt BJ (1971) Estimating soil moisture depletion from climate, crop and soil data. Trans ASAE 14:954Google Scholar
  11. Jordan WR, Ritchie JT (1971) Influence of soil water stress on evapotranspiration, root absorption and internal water status of cotton. Plant Physiol 48:783Google Scholar
  12. McCree KJ (1974) Changes in the stomatal response characteristics of grain sorghum produced by water stress during growth. Crop Sci 14:273Google Scholar
  13. Meyer WS, Green GC (1980a) Leaf growth, phenological development and yield of wheat grown under different irrigation treatments. Water SA 6:21Google Scholar
  14. Meyer WS, Green GC (1980b) Water use by wheat and plant indicators of available soil water. Agron J 72:253Google Scholar
  15. Meyer WS, Ritchie JT (1980) Resistance to water flow in the sorghum plant. Plant Physiol 65:33Google Scholar
  16. Penman HL (1963) Vegetation and hydrology, Tech Communic 53. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden England, p 125Google Scholar
  17. Reicosky DC, Ritchie JT (1976) Relative importance of soil resistance and plant resistance in root water absorption. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:293Google Scholar
  18. Ritchie JT, Burnett E, Henderson RC (1972) Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate. III. Soil water influence. Agron J 64:168Google Scholar
  19. Ritchie JT (1973) Influence of soil water status and meteorological conditions on evaporation from a corn canopy. Agron J 65:893Google Scholar
  20. Ritchie JT (1974) Evaluating irrigation needs of south-eastern USA. In: Contribution of irrigation and drainage to World food supply. Am Soc Chem Eng August 1974, Biloxi Mississippi, p 262Google Scholar
  21. Sionit N, Kramer PJ (1977) Effect of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agron J 69:274Google Scholar
  22. Van Bavel CHM (1967) Changes in canopy resistance to water loss from alfalfa induced by soil water depletion. Agric Meteorol 4:165Google Scholar
  23. Van Volkenburgh E, Davies WJ (1977) Leaf anatomy and water relations of plants grown in controlled environments and in the field. Crop Sci 17:353Google Scholar
  24. Watts WR (1974) Leaf extension in Zea mays. III. Field measurements of leaf extension in response to temperature and leaf water potential. J Exp Bot 25:1085Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. S. Meyer
    • 1
  • G. C. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil and Irrigation Research InstitutePretoriaRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations