Biology and Fertility of Soils

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 141–147 | Cite as

Nitrogen mineralization and water-table height in oligotrophic deep peat

  • B. L. Williams
  • R. E. Wheatley
Article

Summary

Peat cores, 0–60 cm depth, were taken on 14 occasions from three experimental plots where the water levels in the surrounding ditches had been artificially controlled for 14 years at 0, 20 and 50 cm below the surface. Numbers of aerobic and anaerobic ammonifying bacteria in the profile were significantly increased (P< 0.05) by lowering the water level from 0 to 50 cm. These increases occurred mainly in the surface 20 cm horizon, where 80%–90% of the ammonifying bacteria in the profile occurred. Mineral N in fresh samples, which was present almost entirely as ammonium, decreased sharply with depth below 20 cm, and on two occasions concentrations were significantly greater (P<0.05) in plots with water levels at 20 and 50 cm than in the flooded peat. Readily mineralized N, produced during waterlogged incubation at 30°C for 9 weeks, was significantly greater (P<0.05) on eight occasions in samples from plots with water levels at 20 or 50 cm than in those where the water level was at the surface. Calculations showed that the increases in N availability as a result of lowering the water-table could be attributed mainly to deeper rooting.

Key words

Peat Water-table height N mineralization Ammonifiers Nitrate reducers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boggie RB (1972) Effect of water-table height on root development of Pinus contorta on deep peat in Scotland. Oikos 23:304–312Google Scholar
  3. Boggie R (1977) Water-table depth and oxygen content of deep peat in relations to root growth of Pinus contorta. Plant Soil 48:447–454Google Scholar
  4. Boggie R, Miller HG (1976) Growth of Pinus contorta at different water-table levels in deep blanket peat. Forestry 49:123–131Google Scholar
  5. Collins VG, D'Sylva BT, Latter PM (1978) Microbial populations in peat. In: Heal OW, Perkins DF (eds) Production ecology of British moors and montane grasslands. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 94–112Google Scholar
  6. Crooke WM, Simpson WE (1971) Determination of ammonium in Kjeldahl digests of crops by an automated procedure. J Sci Food Agric 22:9–10Google Scholar
  7. Darbyshire JF, Wheatley RE, Greaves MP, Inkson RHE (1974) A rapid method for estimating bacterial and protozoan populations in soil. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 11:465–475Google Scholar
  8. Dickson DA, Savill PS (1974) Early growth of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. on deep oligotrophic peat in Northern Ireland. Forestry 47:57–88Google Scholar
  9. Hart PBS, Sparling GP, Kings JA (1986) Relationship between mineralisable nitrogen and microbial biomass in a range of plant litters, peats and soils of moderate to low pH. NZ J Agric Res 29:681–686Google Scholar
  10. Henriksen A, Selmer-Olsen AR (1970) Automated methods for determining nitrite and nitrate in water and soil extracts. Analyst 95:514–518Google Scholar
  11. Isirimah NO, Keeney DR (1973) Nitrogen transformations in aerobic and waterlogged histosols. Soil Sci 115:123–129Google Scholar
  12. Killham K (1986) Heterotrophic nitrification. Spec Publ Soc Gen Microbiol 20:117–126Google Scholar
  13. Klemedtsson L, Svensson BH, Lindberg T, Rosswall T (1977) The use of acetylene inhibition of nitrous oxide reductase in quantifying denitrification in soils. Swed J Agric Res 7:179–185Google Scholar
  14. Kroeckel L, Stolp H (1986) Influence of the water regime on denitrification and aerobic respiration in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 2:15–21Google Scholar
  15. Lewis RF, Pramer D (1958) Isolation of Nitrosomonas in pure culture. J Bacteriol 76:524–528Google Scholar
  16. Megraw SR, Knowles R (1987) Active methanotrophs suppress nitrification in a humisol. Biol Fertil Soils 4:205–212Google Scholar
  17. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parkinson D, Gray TRG, Williams ST (1971) Methods for studying the ecology of soil microorganisms. International Biological Programme Handbook. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosswall T, Granhall V (1980) Nitrogen cycling in a subarctic ombrotrophic mire. In: Sonesson M (ed) Ecology of a subarctic mire. Swed Nat Sci Res Counc, Stockholm, pp 209–234Google Scholar
  20. Segeberg H von (1955) Zur Kenntnis der spezifischen Gewichte von Niedermoortorfen. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd 71:133–141Google Scholar
  21. Smith SM, Zimmerman K (1981) Nitrous oxide production by non denitrifying soil nitrate reducers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:865–871Google Scholar
  22. Sowden FJ, Morita H, Levesque M (1978) Organic nitrogen distribution in selected peats and peat fractions. Can J Soil Sci 58:237–249Google Scholar
  23. Stanier RV (1947) Studies on non-fruiting myxobacteria. J Bacteriol 53:297–315Google Scholar
  24. Wall LL, Gehrke CW, Neuner TE, Cathey RD, Rexroad PR (1975) Total protein nitrogen: Evaluation and comparison of four different methods. J Assoc Off Agric Chem 58:807–811Google Scholar
  25. Williams BL (1974) Effect of water-table level on nitrogen mineralization in peat. Forestry 47:195–202Google Scholar
  26. Williams BL (1984) The influence of peatland type and the chemical characteristics of peat on the content of readily mineralized nitrogen. In: Proc 7th Int Peat Congr, Dublin 1984, 4:410–418 Irish National Peat Society, DublinGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams BL, Sparling GP (1988) Microbial biomass carbon and readily mineralized nitrogen in peat and forest humus. Soil Biol Biochem (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Williams RT, Crawford RL (1983) Microbial diversity of Minnesota peatlands. Microb Ecol 9:201–214Google Scholar
  29. Zimenko TG, Misnik AG (1970) Effect of ground water level on ammonification and nitrification in peat bog soils. Mikrobiologiya 39:522–526Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. L. Williams
    • 1
  • R. E. Wheatley
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Peat and Forest Soil and MicrobiologyThe Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, AberdeenScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations