Effect of ammonium fertilizer on NH3 loss and Ca, Mg, ammonium and nitrate content in a calcareous soil solution
- 49 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Summary
This study examined the effects of NH inf4 + fertilizers [(NH4)2SO4, (NH4)2HPO4, CO(NH2)2, NH4OH, and NH4NO3] on NH3 loss and the quantity of Ca + Mg, NH inf4 + and NO inf3 sup− in the solution of a calcareous soil (Harkey sicl, Typic Torrifluvent). Various NH4 fertilizers applied at a depth of 5 cm in the soil produced differing NH3 loss characteristics. Applying (NH4)2SO4 (AS) resulted in high volatile NH3 losses as compared with NH4OH (AH) and (NH4)2CO3 (AC). The AS treatment formed an equal molar amount of CaSO4, which increased the mobility of ammonium, while AH and AC treatments caused Ca precipitation and decreased ammonium mobility. Leaching the AS system before NH3 loss could occur resulted in the most rapid nitrification rate. Lower nitrification rates were found with AH and AC than AS under the same conditions. Surface placement of NH4 fertilizers resulted in variable leachate contents of Ca + Mg. Ammonium sulfate reacted with CaCO3 either to solubilize some Ca + Mg or simply to replace exchangeable Ca + Mg with NH4, while AH, AC, and (NH4)2HPO4 (DAP) precipitated essentially an equivalent molar amount of soluble and adsorbed Ca + Mg. Use of NH4NO3, which does not form an insoluble calcium precipitate, resulted in the leaching of an equivalent molar amount of exchangeable Ca + Mg from the Harkey soil.
Key words
Ca precipitation Calcium sulfate formation Ammonium carbonate Ammonium hydroxide Ammonium phosphate Ammonium sulfate Ammonia lossPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Adams F (1982) A comparison of the effects of monocalcium phosphate and diammonium phosphate or phosphorus and calcium availabilitics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:769–771Google Scholar
- Bower CA, Gardner WR, Coertzen JO (1957) Dynamics of cation exchange in soil columns. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 21:20–24Google Scholar
- Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Dow AI, Cline TA (1977) Salt tolerance of irrigated mint. Agron AbstrGoogle Scholar
- Fenn LB, Kissel DE (1973) Ammonia volatilization from surface applications of ammonium compounds on calcareous soils: I. General theory. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37:855–859Google Scholar
- Fenn LB, Escarzaga R (1976) Ammonia volatilization from surface applications of ammonium on calcareous soils: V. Soil water content and method of nitrogen application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:537–541Google Scholar
- Fenn LB, Miyamoto S (1981) Ammonia loss and associated reactions of urea in calcareous soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:537–540Google Scholar
- Fenn LB, Taylor RM, Matocha JE (1981) Influence of soluble calcium and magnesium on ammonia losses from surface applied nitrogen fertilizer: general theory. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:777–781Google Scholar
- Fenn LB, Taylor RM, Horst GL (1983) The influence of calcium on ammonium absorption by great white northern beans. Agron Abstr, p 168Google Scholar
- Horst GL, Fenn LB, Taylor RM, Beadle NB (1983) Bermudagrass growth as related to the nitrogen/calcium ratio. Agron Abstr, p 126Google Scholar
- Matocha JE (1976) Chemical changes in soil properties as influenced by nitrogen sources and liming under continuous coastal bermudagrass. Agron Abstr, p 192Google Scholar
- Otchere-Boateng J, Ballard TM (1978) Urea fertilizer effects on dissolved nutrient concentrations in some forest soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:503–508Google Scholar
- Rouquette FM, Kiesling TC (1984) Influence of source and rate of nitrogen on coastal bermudagrass forage grown on two soil types. Consolidated Prog Rpt 414, p 153. Forage Research in TexasGoogle Scholar
- Taylor RM, Fenn LB, Horst GL (1985) The influence of calcium on growth of selected vegetable species in the presence of ammonium-nitrogen. J Plant Nutr 8:1013–1023Google Scholar
- Terman GL (1979) Volatilization losses of nitrogen as ammonia from surface-applied fertilizers, organic amendments, and crop residue. Adv Agron 31:189–223Google Scholar