Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 41–46 | Cite as

Comparison of cellular basis of drug sensitivity of human colon, pancreatic, and renal carcinoma cell lines with that of leukemia cell lines

  • Shogo Ozawa
  • Tetsuya Yasuda
  • Makoto Inaba
Original Articles Cellular Drug Sensitivity, Antitumor Agent, Human Colon Cancer, Human Leukemia

Summary

In an attempt to find how much the low therapeutic effectiveness of antitumor drugs against so-called chemotherapy-refractory tumors such as colon carcinoma depends on drug sensitivity at the cellular level, sensitivity of five carcinoma cell lines (three colorectal, one pancreatic, and one renal) to nine typical anticancer agents was compared in vitro with that of four generally chemotherapysusceptible leukemia cell lines. Sensitivity was assesed in terms of the percentage cell growth in control cultures, which was determined by exposing exponentially growing cells for 48 h to the following antitumor drugs: 1-(4-amino-2-methylpyridine-5-yl)-methyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)3-nitrosourea hydrochloride (ACNU), adriamycin (ADM), bleomycin (BLM), cisplatin (DDP), etoposide (VP-16), 5-fluorouracil (5FU), mitomycin C (MMC), methotrexate (MTX), and vinblastine (VLB). As expected, 10-fold or greater differences in sensitivity were scarcely ever observed between the two kinds of cell lines. Thus, we recorded a result of more (or less) sensitivity when there was a difference of 3-fold or more; and compared the drug sensitivity in every pair of carcinoma and leukemia cell lines (20 pairs for each drug). We found that carcinoma cell lines were less sensitive to VP-16, ADM, DDP, and MTX than leukemia cell lines in 18, 15, 12, and 10 of 20 pairs, respectively; only one opposite case was observed, with DDP. On the other hand, no such tendency between the two groups was observed with BLM, 5FU, or MMC. Overall, significantly different sensitivities were observed between them in 91 out of 180 pairs (i.e., 9 antitumor drugsx5 carcinomasx4 leukemias), and carcinoma cell lines were less sensitive than leukemia cell lines in 79 of these 91 pairs. These results suggest that the refractoriness of colon carcinoma, etc. to chemotherapy is, at least in part, due to low drug sensitivity of the tumor cell itself.

Keywords

Renal Carcinoma Cell Etoposide Carcinoma Cell Line Colon Carcinoma Mitomycin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams RA (1967) Formal discussion: the role of transplantation in the experimental investigation of human leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res 27:2479Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams RA, Flowers A, Davis BJ (1968) Direct implantation and serial transplantation of human acute lymphoblastic leukemia in hamsters. SB-2. Cancer Res 28:1121Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charbit A, Mulaise EP, Tubiana M (1971) Relation between the pathological nature and the growth rate of human tumors. Eur J Cancer 7:307Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dexter DL, Barbosa JA, Calabresi P (1979) N,N-Dimethylformamide-induced alteration of cell culture characteristics and loss of tumorigenicity in cultured human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 39:1020Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finlay GJ, Wilson WR, Baguley BC (1986) Comparison of in vitro activity of cytotoxic drugs towards human carcinoma and leukemia cell lines. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 22:655Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foley GE, Lazarus H, Farber S, Uzman BG, Boone BA, McCarthy RE (1965) Continuous culture of human lymphoblasts from peripheral blood of a child with acute leukemia. Cancer 18:522Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenberg ML, Chanana AD, Cronkite EP, Giacomelli G, Rai KR, Schiffer LM, Stryckmans PA, Vincent PC (1972) The generation time of human leukemic myeloblasts. Lab Invest 26:245Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lozzio CB, Lozzio BB (1975) Human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell-line with positive Philadelphia chromosome. Blood 45:321Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mäntylä MJ (1979) Regional blood flow in human tumors. Cancer Res 39:2304Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noguchi P, Wallace R, Johnson J, Earley EM, O'brien S, Ferrone S, Pellegrino MA, Milstien J, Needy C, Browne W, Petricciani J (1979) Characterization of WiDr: a human colon carcinoma cell line. In Vitro 15:401Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Putten LM van, Sluijter EA, Smink T, Mulder JH (1981) Why do colon tumours respond poorly to chemotherapeutic agents? Recent Results Cancer Res 79:10Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ruckdeschel JC, Carney DN, Oie HK, Russel EK, Gazdar AF (1987) In vitro chemosensitivity of human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Treat Rep 71:697Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takahashi H, Sasaki Y, Saijo N, Sakurai M, Nakano H, Nakagawa K, Hoshi A, Jett JR, Hong W-S (1987) In vitro colony inhibition of carboplatin against stomach and lung cancer cell lines in comparison with cisplatin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 19:197Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terz JJ, Curutchet HP, Lawrrence WJ (1971) Analysis of the cell kinetics in five human solid tumors. Cancer 28:1100Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tom BH, Rutzky LP, Jakstys MM, Oyasu R, Kaye CI, Kahen BD (1976) Human colonic adenocarcinoma cells: I. Establishment and description of a new line. In vitro 12:180Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsuruo T, Fidler IJ (1981) Differences in drug sensitivity among tumor cells from parental tumors, selected varants, and spontaneous metastases. Cancer Res 41:3058Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wolf CR, Hayward IP, Lawrie SS, Buckton K, McIntyre MA, Adams DJ, Lewis AD, Scott ARR, Smyth JF (1987) Cellular heterogeneity and drug resistance in two ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines derived from a single patient.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yung W-A, Shapiro JR, Shapiro WR (1982) Heterogenous chemosensitivities of subpopulations of human glioma cells in culture. Cancer Res 42:992Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yunis AA, Arimura GK, Russin DJ (1977) Human pancreatic carcinoma (MIA PaCa-2) in continuous culture: sensitivity to asparaginase. Int J Cancer 19:128Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shogo Ozawa
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Yasuda
    • 1
  • Makoto Inaba
    • 1
  1. 1.Cancer Chemotherapy CenterJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations