Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 39–43 | Cite as

A comparison of three severity score indexes in an evaluation of serious bacterial pneumonia

  • A. Durocher
  • F. Saulnier
  • R. Beuscart
  • F. Dievart
  • F. Bart
  • R. Deturck
  • F. Wattel
Original Articles

Abstract

Two non specific severity scoring systems, acute physiological score (APS) and simplified acute physiological score (SAPS) are compared with a specific index (Sc) in an evaluation of 96 ICU patients with “serious” bacterial pneumonia. The three scores were measured during the first 24 h following ICU admission. There is a good correlation between APS, SAPS or Sc. Accuracy and efficiency of the non specific scoring indexes and Sc are similar. There is no statistical difference in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, receiver operating characteristic curves of the three indexes. Simple and reliable non specific index such as SAPS, valid for a variety of pathologies, can be used in an evaluation of mortality and comparative studies of groups of patients with serious bacterial pneumonia.

Key words

Pneumonia Severity score index 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE (1981) Apache: acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med 9:591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Alperovitch A (1983) Simplified acute physiological score for intensive care patients. Lancet 2:741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durocher A, Beuscart C, Fourrier F, Beuscart R, Dubois D, Steenhouver F, Chopin C, Gosselin B, Wattel F (1982) Facteurs pronostiques des pneumopathies bactériennes. In: Etats infectieux graves en réanimation. Expansion Scientifique (ed), Paris, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Youden WJ (1950) Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3:32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Mathieu D, Mercier P, Thomas R, Villers D (1984) A simplfied acute physiologic score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med 12:175Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Le Gall JR, Loirat Ph, Nicolas F, Granthil C, Wattel F, Thomas R, Glaser P, Mercier P, Latournerie J, Candau P, Macquin I, Alperovitch A, Bigel P (1983) Utilisation d'un indice de gravité dans huit services de réanimation multidisciplinaires. Nouv Presse Med 12:1757Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loirat Ph, Gyaraud M, Rigattieri S, Alperovitch A, Legall JR (1983) Comparison of three severity indexes in acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis. Intensive Care Med 9:236Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moreau R, Sicot C (1985) Evaluation du pronostic à court terme des cirrhoses admises en réanimation à l'aide de 4 indices de gravité. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 9:871PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knaus WA, Le Gall JR, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Loirat P, Campos RA, Cullen DJ, Kholes MK, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mercier P, Nicolas F, Nikki P, Shin B, Snyder JV, Wattel F, Zimmerman JE (1982) Comparison of intensive care in the USA and France. Lancet 2:642PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Durocher
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Saulnier
    • 1
  • R. Beuscart
    • 1
  • F. Dievart
    • 1
  • F. Bart
    • 1
  • R. Deturck
    • 1
  • F. Wattel
    • 1
  1. 1.Intensive Care DepartmentHôpital CalmetteLilleFrance
  2. 2.Service de RéanimationHôpital CalmetteLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations