Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 39, Issue 1–2, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Clarity performance variables of polluted water

  • M. F. Al-Shahwani
  • E. H. Al-Rawi
Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

Clarity performance variables of polluted water at different conditions of bioflocculation were studied through a set of laboratory experiments using the shake flask technique. The study was based on the relationship between physical properties of developed bioflocs and some environmental parameters. The physical properties included floc sizes and numbers, solution turbidity and the ratio of unsettled floc numbers (ufn) to total floc numbers (tfn) and settled floc volume (sfv) to total floc volume (tfv). The environmental parameters were the application of different sources of wastewaters, using of filamentous, floc forming, and natural bacteria, mixed at different speeds. The results indicated that various sources of wastewater mixed at different speeds, in the presence of various categories of bacteria allowed the development of flocs possessing a wide range of physical properties. Clarity performance was directly proportional with the ratio of sfv/tfv and inversely proportional with ufn/tfn. These ratios, on one hand, and with the floc sizes, numbers and solution turbidity, on the other hand, were discussed from the view point of their importance in clarity performance efficiency measurement of wastewater.

Keywords

Wastewater Polluted Water Turbidity Laboratory Experiment Environmental Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Shahwani, M. F., Al-Ghazali, M. R., and Al-Rawi, E. H.: 1987, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 379.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Shahwani, M. F. and Jazrawi, S. F.: 1985, Agricultural Wastes 14, 161.Google Scholar
  3. American Public Health Association (APHA): 1980, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (15th ed.), Public Health Association, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Busch, P. L. and Stumm, W.: 1968, Environmental Science and Technology 2, 49.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, Y., Pfeffer, J. T., and Chian, E. S. K.: 1980, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40, 1049.Google Scholar
  6. Degremont: 1979, Water Treatment Hand-Book (5th ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisban, Toronto.Google Scholar
  7. Dick, R. I. and Vesilind, P. A.: 1969, Journal WPCF 41, 1285.Google Scholar
  8. Fitch, B. and Kos, P.: 1976, Journal WPCF 48, 1979.Google Scholar
  9. Francois, R. J. and Van Haute, A. A.: 1985, Wat. Sci. Tech. 17, 1091.Google Scholar
  10. Francois, R. J. and Van Haute, A. A.: 1984, ‘Floc Strength Measurements Giving Experimental Support for a Four Level Hydroxide Floc Structure’, in L. Pawlowski and R. Verdier (eds.), Chemistry for the Protection of the Environment, Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam, 14 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Lau, A. O., Strom, P. F., and Jenkins, D.: 1984, Journal WPCF 56, 52.Google Scholar
  12. Lawler, D. F. and Wilkes, D. R.: 1984, Journal AWWA, July, pp. 90–97.Google Scholar
  13. Lawler, D. F., Izurieta, E., and Kao, C. P.: 1983, Journal AWWA, December, pp. 604–611.Google Scholar
  14. Parker, D. S.: 1983, Journal WPCF, April, pp. 349–359.Google Scholar
  15. Pipes, W. O.: 1979, Journal WPCF 51, 62–70.Google Scholar
  16. Reed, G. D. and Mery, P. C.: 1986, Journal AWWA, August, pp. 55–80.Google Scholar
  17. Sezgin, M.: 1982, Water Research 16, 83.Google Scholar
  18. Sezgin, M., Jenkins, D., and Parker, D. S.: 1978, J. Water Poll. Control Fed. 50, 362.Google Scholar
  19. Taber, W. A.: 1976, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 30, 263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Al-Shahwani
  • E. H. Al-Rawi
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Pollution DepartmentBiological Research CenterBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations