Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 433–451 | Cite as

Micrometeorological measurement of pesticide vapor flux from bare soil and corn under field conditions

  • L. H. Parmele
  • E. R. Lemon
  • A. W. Taylor


An intensive study was conducted to evaluate the movement of dieldrin and heptachlor vapor from a treated watershed. The successful application of micrometeorological estimates of evapotranspiration using average hourly data indicates that reasonable confidence can be placed on the computation of vertical pesticide flux rates using the equation:
$$P = K_Z \left( {\frac{{\partial p}}{{\partial Z}}} \right)$$
where vertical diffusivity coefficient, Ki, for pesticide vapor is assumed equal to Kz for water vapor as measured by micrometeorological methods.

Total daily pesticide flux can easily be calculated by summing the total estimated flux for each of the 2 or 4 hr observations. Interpretations of within-canopy pesticide flux profiles and evapotranspiration flux rates indicate that the pesticide flux rate during nighttime hours is zero.

No major sources or sinks for pesticide within the crop could be found, and it was concluded that the pesticide vapor flux was directly from the soil itself. Thus, vertical pesticide flux measurements made above the canopy are representative of total vertical flux rates.

It is possible to evaluate the mass horizontal flow and the downwind pattern of adsorption of pesticide vapor on untreated soil as well as dissipation into the atmosphere.


Flux Rate Dieldrin Heptachlor Vertical Diffusivity Untreated Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barrows, H. L., Caro, J.H., Armiger, W. H., and Edwards, W.M.: 1969, Environ. Sci. Technol. 3, 261.Google Scholar
  2. Bowen, I. S.: 1926, Phys. Rev. 27, 779.Google Scholar
  3. Caro, J. H.: 1971, Agr. Food Chem. 19, 78.Google Scholar
  4. Fritschen, L. J.: 1965, Bull. Intern. Assoc. Sci. Hydrol. 10, 38.Google Scholar
  5. Fritschen, L. J.: 1966, Agronomy J. 58, 339.Google Scholar
  6. Harrold, L. L. and Dreibelbis, F. R.: 1958, U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1179, 166 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Harrold, L. L. and Dreibelbis, F. R.: 1967, U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1367, 123 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Lemon, E. R.: 1969, Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield, pp. 117.Google Scholar
  9. Lemon, E. R.: 1965, Plant Physiol. 4, 203.Google Scholar
  10. Lemon, E. R. and Wright, J. L.: 1969, Agronomy J. 61, 405.Google Scholar
  11. Lourence, F. J. and Pruitt, W. O.: 1969, J. Appl. Meteorol. 8, 492.Google Scholar
  12. Panofsky. H. A., Blackadar, A. K., and McVehil, G. E.: 1960, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 390.Google Scholar
  13. Pruitt, W. O. and Lourence, F.: 1966, Tests of Aerodynamic, Energy Budget and Other Evaporation Equations Over a Grass Surface, Final Report 1965. Investigations of Energy, Momentum, and Mass Transfer Near the Ground, United States Army Electronics Command, Atmospheric Sciences Laboratory, p. 37.Google Scholar
  14. Sellers, W. D.: 1965, Physical Climatology, U. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 271 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Tanner, C. B.: 1968, Evaporation of Water from Plants and Soil, Water Deficits and Plant Growth (ed. by T. T. Kozlowski), Academic Press, New York, p. 73.Google Scholar
  16. Thornthwaite, C. W. and Hare, F. K.: 1965, Meteorol. Monogr. 6, 163.Google Scholar
  17. Uchijima, Z. and Wright, J. L.: 1964, Bull. Nat. Inst. Agr. Sci. A11, 19.Google Scholar
  18. Webb, E. K.: 1965, Meteorol. Monogr. 6 (7).Google Scholar
  19. Wright, J. L. and Lemon, E. R.: 1966, Agronomy J. 58, 265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. H. Parmele
    • 1
  • E. R. Lemon
    • 2
  • A. W. Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.Northeast Watershed Research Center, SWC, ARS, USDAUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Microclimate Investigations, SWC, ARS, USDACornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Soils Laboratory, SWC, ARS, USDABeltsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations