Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 443–448 | Cite as

Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors

  • Luis H. Guerra-Santos
  • Othmar Käppeli
  • Armin Fiechter
Biotechnology

Summary

Continuous culture studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa were performed in order to establish nutritional and environmental conditions necessary for high production of biosurfactants. Empirical adjustments of the mineral medium formulation showed that better yields of the active compounds, rhamnolipids, are obtained by minimizing the concentration of the respective salts of magnesium, calcium, potassium, sodium and the trace elements. Improvements in performance were more evident when the intial substrate concentration, glucose, was increased up to 73 gl-1. Further, the ranges for pH (6.2 to 6.4) and temperature (32° to 34°C) that yield high biosurfactant biosynthesis were established. Concerning the physiological state of the microorganism, rhamnolipid formation was restricted to specific growth rates lower than D=0.14 h-1. By applying the conditions elaborated up to 300 mg rhamnose l-1 h-1 (equivalent to 685 mg rhamnolipid l-1 h-1) were obtained in a continuous production process.

Keywords

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Substrate Concentration Specific Growth Specific Growth Rate Continuous Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cooper DG, Zajic JE (1980) Surface compounds from microorganisms. Adv Appl Microbiol 26: 229–256Google Scholar
  2. Dawes EA, Senior PJ (1973) The role and regulation of energy reserve polymers in microorganisms. Adv Microbial Physiol 10: 135–266Google Scholar
  3. Fiechter A (1984) Physical and chemical parameters of microbial growth. In: Fiechter A (ed) Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, vol. 30. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 8Google Scholar
  4. Finnerty WR, Singer ME (1983) Microbial enhancement of oil recovery. Bio/technology 1: 47–54Google Scholar
  5. Guerra-Santos L, Käppeli O, Fiechter A (1984a) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biosurfactant production in continuous culture with glucose as carbon source. Appl Environ Microbiol 48: 301–305Google Scholar
  6. Guerra-SantosL, KäppeliO, FiechterA (1984b) Process development for biosurfactant production. Third European Congress on Biotechnology, Proceedings, vol I. Chemie Weinheim, p 507Google Scholar
  7. Harder W, Dijkhuizen L (1983) Physiological responses to nutrient limitations. Ann Rev Microbiol 37: 1–23Google Scholar
  8. Hisatsuka K, Nakahara T, Sano N, Yamada K (1971) Formation of rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its function in hydrocarbon fermentation. Agr Biol Chem 35: 686–692Google Scholar
  9. Ito S, Inoue S (1982) Sophorolipids from Torulopsis bombicola. Possible relation to alkane uptake. Appl Environ Microbiol 43: 1278–1283Google Scholar
  10. Käppeli O, Finnerty WR (1980) Characteristics of hexadecane partition by the growth medium of Acinetobacter sp. Biotechnol Bioeng 22: 495–503Google Scholar
  11. Meyer H-P, Käppeli O, Fiechter A (1985) Growth control in microbial cultures. Ann Rev Microbiol 39: 299–319Google Scholar
  12. Neijssel OM, Tempest DW (1979) The physiology of metabolic over-production. In: Bull AT, Ellwood DC, Ratledge C (eds) Microbial technology: Current state, future prospects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 53Google Scholar
  13. Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Rapp P, Bock H, Wray V, Wagner F (1979) Formation, isolation and characterisation of trehalose dimycolates from Rhodococcus erythropolis grown on n-alkanes. J Gen Microbiol 115: 491–503Google Scholar
  15. Sutherland IW (1982) Biosynthesis of microbial exopolysacharides. Adv Microbiol Physiol 23: 79–15Google Scholar
  16. Tempest DW, Wonters JTM (1981) Properties and performance of microorganisms in chemostat culture. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 3: 283–290Google Scholar
  17. Zajic JE, Panchal C (1976) Bioemulsifiers. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 5: 39–66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis H. Guerra-Santos
    • 1
  • Othmar Käppeli
    • 1
  • Armin Fiechter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologySwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations