Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 159, Issue 2, pp 131–135 | Cite as

Amino acid utilization by the ruminal bacterium Synergistes jonesii strain 78-1

  • Christopher S. McSweeny
  • Milton J. Allison
  • Roderick I. Mackie
Original Papers


The ruminal bacterium Synergistes jonesii strain 78-1, which is able to degrade the pyridinediol toxin in the plant Leucaena leucephala, was studied for its ability to utilise amino acids. The organism used arginine, histidine and glycine from a complex mixture of amino acids, and both arginine and histidine supported growth in a semi-defined medium. The products of (U-14C)-arginine metabolism were CO2 acetate, butyrate, citrulline and ornithine. The labelling pattern of end products from (U-14C)-histidine metabolism differed in that carbon also flowed into formate and propionate. Arginine was catabolised by the arginine deiminase pathway which was characterised by the presence of arginine deiminase, ornithine transcarbamylase and carbamate kinase. This is the first report of a rumen bacterium that uses arginine and histidine as major energy yielding substrates.

Key words

Synergistes jonesii Rumen bacteria Arginine metabolism Pyridinediol detoxification 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allison MJ, Cook HM, Stahl DA (1987) Characterization of rumen bacteria that degrade dihydrosypyridine compounds produced from mimosine. In: Rose M (ed) Herbivore nutrition research Australian Society of Animal Production, Brisbane, Australia, pp 55–56Google Scholar
  2. Allison MJ, Hammond AC, Jones RJ (1990) Detection of ruminal bacterial that degrade toxic dihydroxypyridine compounds produced from mimosine. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 590–594Google Scholar
  3. Allison MJ, Mayberry WR, McSweeney CS, Stahl DA (1992) Synergistes jonesii, gen. nov., sp. nov.: a rumen bacterium that degrades toxic pyridinediols. Syst Appl Microbiol (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Barker HA (1961) Fermentations of nitrogenous organic compounds. In: Gunsalus IC, Stanier RY (eds) The bacteria, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 151–207Google Scholar
  5. Bradford M (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein, utilising the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254Google Scholar
  6. Bryant MP (1972) Commentary on the Hungate technique for culture of anaerobic bacteria. Am J Clin Nutr 25: 1324–1328Google Scholar
  7. Caldwell DR, Bryant MP (1966) Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 14: 794–801Google Scholar
  8. Canale A, Valente ME, Ciotti A (1984) Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1−C5) and lactic acid in aqueous extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. J Sci Food Agri 38: 1178–1182Google Scholar
  9. Crow VL, Thomas TD (1982) Arginine metabolism in lactic streptococci. J Bacteriol 150: 1024–1032Google Scholar
  10. Cunin R, Glansdorff N, Pierard A, Stalon V (1986) Biosynthesis and metabolism of arginine in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 50: 314–352Google Scholar
  11. Driessen AJM, Molenaar D, Konings WN (1989) Kinetic mechanism and specificity of the arginine-ornithine antiporter of Lactococcus lactis. J Biol Chem 264: 10361–10370Google Scholar
  12. Dominguez-Bello MG, Stewart CS (1990) Degradation of mimosine, 2,3-dihydroxy pyridine and 3-hydroxy-4 (1H)-pyridone by bacteria from the rumen of sheep in Venezuela. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73: 283–289Google Scholar
  13. Gottschalk G (1986) Fermentation of nitrogenous compounds. In: Gottschalk G (ed) Bacterial metabolism, vol 2. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 269–282Google Scholar
  14. Hammond AC, Allison MJ, Williams MJ, Prine GM, Bates DB (1989) Prevention of Leucaena toxicosis of cattle in Florida by ruminal inoculation with 3-hydroxy-4-(1H)-pyridone-degrading bacteria. Am J Vet Res 50: 2176–2180Google Scholar
  15. Hart NK, Hofmann A, Lamberton JA, Richards CM (1977) Mimosine, mimosinamine and 3,4 dihydroxypyridine. Heterocycles 7: 265–272Google Scholar
  16. Hegarty MP, Schinckel PG, Court RD (1964) Reaction of sheep to the consumption of Leucaena glauca benth and to its toxic principle mimosine. Aust J Agric Res 15: 153–167Google Scholar
  17. Hungate RE (1969) A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anoerobes. In: Norris IR, Ribbons EW (eds) Methods in microbiology, vol 3. Academic Press, New York London, pp 117–132Google Scholar
  18. Jones RJ (1979) The value of Leucaena leucocephala as a feed for ruminants in the tropics. World Anim Rev 31: 13–23Google Scholar
  19. Jones RJ (1981) Does ruminal metabolism of mimosine explain the absence of Leucaena toxicity in Hawaii? Aust Vet J 57: 55Google Scholar
  20. Jones RJ, Megarrity RG (1983) Comparable toxicity responses of goats fed Leucaena leucocephala in Australia and Hawaii. Aust J Agric Res 34: 781–790Google Scholar
  21. Jones RJ, Lowry JB (1984) Australian goats detoxify the goitrogen 3-hydroxy-4(1H)pyridone (DHP) after rumen infusions from an Indonesian goat. Experientia 40: 1435–1436Google Scholar
  22. Jones RJ, Megarrity RG (1986) Successful transfer of DHP-degrading bacteria from Hawaiian goats to Australian ruminants to overcome the toxicity of Leucaena. Aust Vet J 63: 259–262Google Scholar
  23. Lowry JB, Maryanto, Tangendjaja B (1983) Autolysis of mimosine to 3-hydroxy-4–1 (H)pyridone in green tissues of Leucaena leucocephala. J Sci Fd Agric 34: 529–533Google Scholar
  24. Monstadt GM, Holldorf AW (1990) Arginine deiminase from Halobacterium salinarium. Biochem J 273: 739–745Google Scholar
  25. Russell JB, Wallace RJ (1988) Energy yielding and consuming reactions. In: Hobson PN (ed) The rumen microbial ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science, New York, pp 185–215Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher S. McSweeny
    • 1
  • Milton J. Allison
    • 2
  • Roderick I. Mackie
    • 3
  1. 1.Long Pocket LaboratoriesCSIRO Division of Tropical Animal ProductionIndooroopillyAustralia
  2. 2.Physiopathology Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research ServiceUS Department of AgricultureAmesUSA
  3. 3.Department of Animal SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations