Child's Nervous System

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 218–222 | Cite as

Prenatal aqueductal stenosis as a cuase of congenital hydrocephalus in the inbred at LEW/Jms

  • Hiroshi Yamada
  • Shizuo Oi
  • Norihiko Tamaki
  • Satoshi Matsumoto
  • Katsuko Sudo
Original Papers

Abstract

We studied the microscopic morphological changes in congenital hydrocephalus in the inbred rat, LEW/Jms, on gestational days 17, 18, and 20 and during the neonatal period to clarify the etiopathogenesis, focusing particularly on the aqueductal changes. At 1 day of age, ventriculomegaly was limited to the lateral and III ventricles, and the aqueduct was obstructed, with the appearance of simple stenosis. On gestational days 20 and 18, the hydrocephalic rats showed occluded aqueducts, which paralleled the finding of hydrocephalus in the newborn rats. On gestational day 17, all eight models examined showed the same size ventricles. However, an aqueductal obstruction was observed in one of them. The other seven rats showed the aqueduct patent. From these observations, it can be concluded that the rat shows an aqueductal obstruction on gestational day 17 and appears to develop hydrocephalus with age. The aqueductal obstruction was considered to be the primary change and not a secondary phenomenon. The site of obstruction was the anterior part of the aqueduct (level of anterior colliculus) at every stage. Aqueductal obstruction following the developmental anomaly of the midbrain in the embryonic stage might thus be the primary cause of congenital hydrocephalus in rats LEW/Jms.

Key words

Aqueductal stenosis Congenital hydrocephalus Experimental hydrocephalus Inbred rat (LEW/Jms) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adeloye A, Warkany J (1976) Experimental congenital hydrocephalus. A review with special consideration of hydrocephalus produced by zinc deficiency. Child's Brain 2:325–360Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aikawa H, Kobayashi S, Suzuki K (1986) Aqueductal lesions in 6-aminonicotinamide-treated suckling mice. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 71:243–250Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry RJ (1961) The inheritance and pathogenesis of hydrocephalus-3 in the mouse. J Pathol Bacteriol 81:157–167Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bicker DS, Adams RD (1949) Hereditary stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius as a cause of congenital hydrocephalus. Brain 72:246–262Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borit A, Sidman RL (1972) New mutant mouse with communicating hydrocephalus and secondary aqueductal stenosis. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 21:316–331Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D'Amato CJ, Oshea KS, Hicks SP, Glover RA, Annesley TM (1986) Genetic prenatal aqueductal stenosis with hydrocephalus in rat. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 45:665–682Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drachman DA, Richardson EP (1961) Aqueductal narrowing, congenital and acquired. Arch Neurol 5:552–559Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edwards JH, Norman RM, Roberts JM (1961) Sex-linked hydrocephalus. Report of a family with 15 affected members. Arch Dis Child 36:481–485Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green MC (1970) The developmental effects of congenital hydrocephalus (ch) in the mouse. Dev Biol 23:585–608Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Higashi K, Asahisa H, Ueda N, Noda Y, Tashiro M (1984) An experimental model of congenital hydrocephalus in the rat. Shoni no Noshinkei (Jpn) 9:257–264Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holmes LB, Nash A, ZuRhein GM, Levin M, Opitz M (1963) X-linked aqueductal stenosis: clinical and neuropathological findings in two families. Pediatrics 63:1104–1110Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jellinger G (1986) Anatomopathology of non-tumoral aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg Sci 30:1–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohn DF, Chinookoswong N, Chou SM (1981) A new model of congenital hydrocephalus in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 54:211–218Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koto M, Miwa M, Shimizu A, Tsuji K, Okamato M, Adachi J (1987) Inherited hydrocephalus in Csk; Wister-Imamichi rats; Hyd strain: a new disease model for hydrocephalus. Jikken Dobutsu 36:157–162Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kristensson K, Leestma J, Lundh B, Norrby E (1984) Sendai virus infection in the mouse brain: virus spread and long-term effects. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 63:89–95Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nugent GR, Al Mefty O, Chou S (1979) Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg 51:812–818Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raimondi AJ, Clark SJ, McLone DG (1976) Pathogenesis of aqueductal occlusion in congenital murine hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 5:66–77Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richardson RR (1985) Congenital genetic murie (ch) hydrocephalus. Child's Nerv Syst 1:87–99Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sasaki S, Goto H, Nagano H, Furuya K, Omata Y, Kanazawa K, Suzuki K, Sudo K (1983) Congenital hydrocephalus revealed in the inbred rat LEW/Jms. Neurosurgery 13:548–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sato H (1986) Experimental congenital hydrocephalus. Pathogenetic processes in differentiating brain. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 26:11–18Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shibuta H, Adachi A, Kanda T, Shimada H (1978) Experimental parainfluenza virus infection. I. Hydrocephalus of mice due to infection with parainfluenza virus type 1 and 3. Microbiol Immunol 22:505–508Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stempark JG (1984) Etiology of trypan blue induced antenatal hydrocephalus in the albino rat. Anat Rec 148:561–571Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams B (1973) Is aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus? Brain 96:399–412Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Woollam DHM, Millen JW (1953) Anatomical consideration in the pathology of stenosis of the cerebral aqueduct. Brain 76:104–112Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Yamada
    • 1
  • Shizuo Oi
    • 1
  • Norihiko Tamaki
    • 1
  • Satoshi Matsumoto
    • 1
  • Katsuko Sudo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryKobe University, School of MedicineKobeJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Medical ScienceTokyo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations