Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 158, Issue 1, pp 26–28 | Cite as

The role of motility in the efficiency of nodulation by Rhizobium meliloti

  • Wanda Malek
Original Papers

Abstract

Tn5 mutants of Rhizobium meliloti L5.30 defective in motility (Mot-) were isolated and compared to the parent with respect to the nodulation activity. Each of the mutants was able to generate normal nodules on the alfalfa (Medicago sativa) but had slightly delayed nodule formation. Coinoculation of lucerne with wild type Mot+ and Mot- cells in the wide range of ratios resulted in nodules occupied in the majority by a motile strain suggesting that motility is a factor involved in the competition for nodule formation.

Key words

Rhizobium meliloti Alfalfa Nodulation competitiveness Motility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen ON (1959) Experiments in soil bacteriology. Minneapolis, Min. Burges Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  2. Amarger N, Lobreau JP (1982) Quantitative study of nodulation competitiveness in Rhizobium. Appl. Environ Microbiol 44: 583–588Google Scholar
  3. Ames P, Bergman K (1981) Competitive advantage provided by bacteria motility in the formation of nodules by Rhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol 148: 728–729Google Scholar
  4. Brockwell J, Schwinghamer EA, Gault RR (1976) Studies of root nodule bacteria introduced into field environments. A critical examination of the stability of antigenic and streptomycin-resistance markers for identification of strain of Rhizobium trifolii. Soil Biol Biochem 9: 1924–1928Google Scholar
  5. Caetano-Anolles G, Wall LG, DeMicheli AT, Macchi EM, Bauer WD, Favelukes G (1988) Role of motility and chemotaxis in efficency of nodulation by Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol 86: 1228–1235Google Scholar
  6. Currier WW, Strobel GA (1976) Chemotaxis of Rhizobium spp. to plant root exudates. Plant Physiol 57: 820–823Google Scholar
  7. Currier WW, Strobel GA (1981) Characterization and biological activity of trifoil chemotactin. Plant Sci Lett 21: 159–165Google Scholar
  8. Gaworzewska ET, Carlile MJ (1982) Positive chemotaxis of Rhizobium leguminosorum and other bacteria towards root exudates from legumes and other plants. J Gen Microbiol 128: 1179–1188Google Scholar
  9. Kondorosi E, Banfalvi Z, Kondorosi A (1984) Physical and genetic analysis of a symbiotic region of Rhizobium meliloti: identification of nodulation genes. Mol Gen Genet 193: 445–452Google Scholar
  10. Kowalski M (1967) Transduction in Rhizobium meliloti. Acta Microbiol Polon 16: 7–12Google Scholar
  11. Kush AK, Dadarwall KR (1981) Root exudates as pre-invasive factors in the nodulation of chick pea varieties. Soil Biol Biochem 13: 51–55Google Scholar
  12. Laird DC (1932) Bacteriophage and the root nodule bacteria. Arch Microbiol 3: 159–163Google Scholar
  13. Małek W (1974) Relation between phage sensitivity and symbiotic properties of auxotrophic mutants of Rhizobium meliloti. Acta Microbiol Polon 6: 225–229Google Scholar
  14. Małek W (1989) Chemotaxis in Rhizobium meliloti strain L5.30. Arch Microbiol 152: 611–612Google Scholar
  15. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellor HY, Glenn AR, Arwas R, Dilworth MJ (1987) Symbiotic and competitive properties of motility mutants of Rhizobium trifolii TA1. Arch Microbiol 148: 34–39Google Scholar
  17. Simon R, Priefer U, Pühler A (1983) A broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotech 1: 784–791Google Scholar
  18. Vincent JM (1970) A manual for the practical study of root nodule bacteria. International biological programme handbook, Vol. 15. Blackwell, Oxford EdinburghGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanda Malek
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General MicrobiologyM. Curie-Skłodowska UniversityLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations