Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 35–39 | Cite as

Operant conditioning of primate triceps surae H-reflex produces reflex asymmetry

  • J. R. Wolpaw
  • C. L. Lee
  • J. G. Calaitges
Article

Summary

Monkeys are able to increase or decrease triceps surae H-reflex when reward depends on reflex amplitude. Operantly conditioned change occurs over weeks and produces persistent alterations in the lumbosacral spinal cord which should be technically accessible substrates of primate memory. Previous work monitored and conditioned triceps surae H-reflex in one leg. To determine whether H-reflex conditioning in one leg affects the control leg, the present study monitored H-reflexes in both legs while the reflex in one leg underwent HR↑ or HR↓ conditioning. Under the HR↑ mode, H-reflex increase was much greater in the HR↑ leg than in the control leg. Under the HR↓ mode, H-reflex decrease was confined to the HR↓ leg. By showing that conditioning of one leg's H-reflex produces H-reflex asymmetry, the data further define the phenomenon and indicate that the other leg can serve as an internal control for physiologic and anatomic studies exploring the sites and mechanisms of the spinal cord memory substrates.

Key words

Memory Learning Operant conditioning Plasticity Spinal cord Spinal reflex Monosynaptic reflex 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldissera F, Hultborn H, Illert M (1981) Integration in spinal neuronal systems. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, Vol II. Motor control, Part 1. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 509–595Google Scholar
  2. Brown WF (1984) The physiological and technical basis of electromyography. Butterworths, Boston, pp 144–148, 474–479Google Scholar
  3. Burke RE, Rudomin P (1978) Spinal neurons and synapses. In: Kandel ER (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, Vol 1. Cellular biology of neurons, Part 2. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 877–944Google Scholar
  4. Byrd LD (1979) A tethering system for direct measurement of cardiovascular function in the caged baboon. Am J Physiol 236: H775-H779Google Scholar
  5. Herchenroder PA, Wolpaw JR (1988) Reflex measurement and modification in unrestrained primates. Soc Neurosci Abstr (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Lundberg A (1967) The supraspinal control of transmission in spinal reflex pathways. Electroenceph Clin Neurophys 25: 35–46Google Scholar
  7. Matthews PBC (1972) Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 319–409Google Scholar
  8. Stein RB, Nichols TR, Jhamandas J, Davis L, Charles D (1977) Stable long-term recordings from cat peripheral nerves. Brain Res 128: 21–38Google Scholar
  9. Stein RB, Gordon T, Hoffer JA, Davis LA, Charles D (1980) Long-term recordings from cat peripheral nerves during degeneration and repair: implications for human nerve repair and prosthetics. In: Jeavett DL, McCarrol HR (eds) Nerve repair: its clinical and experimental basis. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 166–176Google Scholar
  10. Wolpaw JR (1987) Operant conditioning of primate spinal reflexes: the H-reflex. J Neurophysiol 57: 443–458Google Scholar
  11. Wolpaw JR, Lee CL (1989) Memory traces in primate spinal cord produced by operant conditioning of H-reflex. J Neurophysiol (in press)Google Scholar
  12. Wolpaw JR, Seegal RF, O'Keefe JA (1983) Adaptive plasticity in the primate spinal stretch reflex: behavior of synergist and antagonist muscles. J Neurophysiol 50: 1312–1319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Wolpaw
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. L. Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. G. Calaitges
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.New York State Department of HealthWadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, Empire State PlazaAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Neurology and AnatomyAlbany Medical CollegeAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations