Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 21–28

Neural correlates of motion after-effects in cat striate cortical neurones: interocular transfer

  • P. Hammond
  • G. S. V. Mouat
Article

Summary

Interocular transfer of motion after-effects was assessed in the lightly-anaesthetized feline striate cortex. Neurones were adapted with squarewave gratings of optimal orientation and spatial frequency, or with randomly textured fields, drifting continuously at optimal velocity in their preferred or null directions. Neural after-effects were assessed as consequent changes in directional bias, using similar test patterns swept back-and-forth in the same directions and presented to the same or opposite eyes. All results were compared with controls, embodying similar tests following a period of exposure to a uniform background or stationary textured field. The majority of binocularly-driven complex and simple cells tested evinced positive interocular transfer of after-effects. After-effects, whether elicited monocularly or interocularly, were direction-specific. With gratings, after-effects elicited interocularly were always weaker than those obtained monocularly. After-effects evoked monocularly by texture adaptation were weak in comparison to those evoked by gratings; interocular transfer in this case was negligible. In neurones strongly dominated by one eye, adaptation of the non-driving eye yielded, at best, extremely weak after-effects through the other eye. In purely monocular neurones, no transfer could be induced. These results confirm the expectation that motion after-effects arise cortically rather than precortically. The partial interocular transfer seen in binocularly-driven cortical cells suggests that these neurones represent a second-stage processing of inputs from lower-order complex (or simple) cells, themselves driven monocularly or strongly dominated by one eye.

Key words

Vision Visual cortex Interocular transfer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht DG, Farrar SB, Hamilton DB (1984) Spatial contrast adaptation characteristics of neurones recorded in the cat’s visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 347: 713–739Google Scholar
  2. Barlow HB, Hill RM (1963) Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature 200: 1345–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleland BG, Levick WR (1974a) Brisk and sluggish concentrically organized ganglion cells in the cat’s retina. J Physiol (Lond) 240: 421–456Google Scholar
  4. Cleland BG, Levick WR (1974b) Properties of rarely encountered types of ganglion cells in the cat’s retina and an overall classification. J Physiol (Lond) 240: 457–492Google Scholar
  5. Cleland BG, Levick WR, Morstyn R, Wagner HG (1976) Lateral geniculate relay of slowly conducting retinal afferents to cat visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 255: 299–320Google Scholar
  6. Hammond P (1974) Cat retinal ganglion cells: size and shape of receptive field centres. J Physiol (Lond) 242: 99–118Google Scholar
  7. Hammond P, Mouat GSV (1986) Interocular transfer of motion after-effects in complex cells of feline striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 381: 99PGoogle Scholar
  8. Hammond P, Mouat GSV, Smith AT (1985) Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving gratings. Exp Brain Res 60: 411–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hammond P, Mouat GSV, Smith AT (1986) Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving texture. Vision Res 26: 1055–1060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammond P, Mouat GSV, Smith AT (1988) Neural correlates of motion after-effects in cat striate cortical neurones: monocular adaptation. Exp Brain Res 72: 1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Levick WR, Thibos LN (1983) Analysis of orientation bias in cat retina. J Physiol (Lond) 329: 243–261Google Scholar
  12. Levinson E, Sekuler R (1980) A two-dimensional analysis of direction-specific adaptation. Vision Res 20: 103–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Maffei L, Fiorentini A, Bisti S (1973) Neural correlate of perceptual adaptation to gratings. Science 182: 1036–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maffei L, Berardi N, Bisti S (1986) Interocular transfer of adaptation after-effect in neurones of area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats. J Neurophysiol 55: 966–976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell DE, Reardon J, Muir DW (1975) Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect in normal and stereoblind observers. Exp Brain Res 22: 163–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Movshon JA, Lennie P (1979) Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 278: 850–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith AT (1985) Velocity coding: evidence from perceived velocity shifts. Vision Res 25: 1969–1976CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stone J, Dreher B (1973) Projection of X- and Y-cells of the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 36: 551–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Vautin RG, Berkley MA (1977) Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: neural correlates of visual after-effects. J Neurophysiol 40: 1051–1065PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vidyasagar TR, Heide W (1984) Geniculate orientation biases seen with moving sinewave gratings: implications for a model of simple cell afferent connectivity. Exp Brain Res 57: 196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. von der Heydt R, Hanny P, Adorjani C (1978) Movement after-effects in the visual cortex. Arch Ital Biol 116: 248–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfe J, Blake R (1985) Monocular and binocular processes in human vision. In: Rose D, Dobson VG (eds) Models of the visual cortex, Chapt 19. Wiley, New York, pp 192–199Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Hammond
    • 1
  • G. S. V. Mouat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communication and NeuroscienceUniversity of KeeleKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations