Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 280–294 | Cite as

Trajectory control in targeted force impulses

VI. Independent specification of response amplitude and direction
  • M. Favilla
  • W. Hening
  • C. Ghez
Article

Summary

The preceding study of this series (Hening, Favilla and Ghez 1988) examined the time course of the processes by which human subjects use information from a target to set the amplitude of an impulse of isometric elbow force. In that study, subjects were provided with separate cues to time response initiation and to inform them of the required amplitude of the response. When the time between target presentation and response initiation was too brief for them to incorporate information from the target, subjects produced default responses whose amplitudes reflected their prior experience. At longer latencies, subjects specified response amplitude with a gradual time course, starting earlier and ending later than an average reaction time. The present study now examines how two distinct response features, amplitude and direction, are specified following presentation of a target. We sought to answer three main questions. What are the features of responses that are produced before target information is available? Are direction and amplitude specified serially or in parallel? Does the specification of one response feature interfere with the specification of the other? Six normal subjects were studied. They were trained to initiate impulses of isometric elbow force in synchrony with the last of a predictable series of regular tones. The amplitudes and directions were to match those of visual targets requiring flexions or extensions with one of three amplitudes. The targets were presented at random times (0–400 ms) before the last tone. Target directions and amplitudes were either predictable (simple condition) or unpredictable (choice condition). In the simple condition, response amplitudes and directions were independent of the interval between target presentation and response onset (S-R interval). In the choice condition, both amplitude and direction varied with the S-R interval. At short S-R intervals (< 100 ms), the direction of the subjects' responses was not related to that of the target. The amplitudes of the responses were near the centers of the two target ranges. With increasing S-R intervals, the proportion of correct direction responses gradually increased. Over the same range of S-R intervals, the amplitudes of both right and wrong direction responses to the different targets separated and converged on their respective target amplitudes. Specification of both direction and amplitude was complete at S-R intervals greater than 300 ms. The time course of amplitude specification in this bidirectional paradigm was prolonged over that in a paradigm where response direction was predictable. As in our previous reports, subjects varied response amplitude by adjusting the time derivatives of force rather than force rise time. Response trajectories were similar for flexor, extensor, right and wrong direction responses. We conclude first, that the amplitudes of impulsive responses to unpredictable targets are specified from an initial default value even when both amplitude and direction are unpredictable; second, the amplitude and direction of such response are specified gradually by separate processing channels operating in parallel; third, the processing of the two response features is not, however, fully independent. It is suggested that the two processes share a common neural resource.

Key words

Human subjects Trajectory formation Isometric Accuracy Reaction time Targeted responses Sensorimotor processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL (1986) Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 9: 357–381Google Scholar
  2. Becker W, Jurgens R (1979) An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Res 19: 967–983Google Scholar
  3. Bonnet M, Requin J, Stelmach GE (1982) Specification of direction and extent in motor programming. Bull Psychonom Sci 19: 31–34Google Scholar
  4. Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis. Duxbury Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74: 829–836Google Scholar
  6. Donders FC (1869) On the speed of mental processes. Translated and reprinted in Acta Psychol 30: 412–431Google Scholar
  7. Duncan J (1980) The demonstration of capacity limitation. Cogn Psychol 12: 75–96Google Scholar
  8. Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1985) Human tracking performance: parallel specification of amplitude and direction. Neuroscience Abstr 11: 72Google Scholar
  9. Favilla M, Hening W, Ghez C (1987) Independent specification of response features in a reaction time paradigm. Neuroscience Abstr 13: 13Google Scholar
  10. Favilla M, Hening W, Gordon J, Ghez C (1986) Preparatory set: independent specification of direction and size in the preparation of responses to a range of targets. Neuroscience Abstr 12: 972Google Scholar
  11. Geldard FA, Sherrick CE (1986) Space, time, and touch. Sci Am 256: 90–95Google Scholar
  12. Ghez C, Gordon J (1987) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. I. Roles of opposing muscles. Exp Brain Res 67: 225–240Google Scholar
  13. Ghez C, Hening W, Favilla M (1989) Initiation and specification of response features: parallel interacting channels. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance, XIII. Ehrlbaum, Hillside New Jersey (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Goodman D, Kelso JAS (1980) Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. J Exp Psychol (Gen) 109: 475–495Google Scholar
  15. Gordon J, Ghez C (1987a) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control. Exp Brain Res 67: 241–252Google Scholar
  16. Gordon J, Ghez C (1987b) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. III. Compensatory adjustments for initial errors. Exp Brain Res 67: 253–269Google Scholar
  17. Gordon J, Bermejo R, Ghez C (1988) Updating of isometric force trajectories: corrections for unexpected changes in target amplitude. Neuroscience Abstr 14: 467Google Scholar
  18. Gottsdanker R, Shragg GP (1985) Verification of Donders' subtraction method. J Exp Psychol (Hum Percept Perform) 11: 765–776Google Scholar
  19. He P, Kowler E (1987) Motor preparation as a determinant of the accuracy of short-latency saccades. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci [Suppl] 28: 332 (ARVO abstract)Google Scholar
  20. Hening W, Favilla M, Ghez C (1988) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. V. Gradual specification of response amplitude. Exp Brain Res 71: 116–128Google Scholar
  21. Hening W, Vicario D, Ghez C (1988) Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. IV. Influences of choice, prior experience and urgency. Exp Brain Res 71: 103–115Google Scholar
  22. Hubel DS, Livingstone MS (1987) Segregration of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18. J Neurosci 7: 3378–3415Google Scholar
  23. Kalaska JF, Caminiti R, Georgopoulos AP (1983) Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex. Exp Brain Res 51: 247–260Google Scholar
  24. Kalaska JF, Hyde ML (1985) Area 4 and area 5: differences between the load direction-dependent discharge variability of cells during active postural fixation. Exp Brain Res 59: 197–202Google Scholar
  25. Keele SW, Posner MI (1968) Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. J Exp Psychol 77: 155–158Google Scholar
  26. Kowler E, Martins AJ, Pavel M (1984) The effect of expectation on slow oculomotor control-IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions. Vision Res 24: 197–210Google Scholar
  27. Kowler E, Steinman RM (1979a) The effect of expectation on slow oculomotor control. I. Periodic target steps. Vision Res 19: 619–632Google Scholar
  28. Kowler E, Steinman RM (1979b) The effect of expectation on slow oculomotor control. II. Single target displacements. Vision Res 19: 633–646Google Scholar
  29. Kowler E, Steinman RM (1981) The effect of expectation on slow oculomotor control. III. Guessing unpredictable target displacements. Vision Res 21: 191–203Google Scholar
  30. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH (1987a) Connections between layer 4B of area 17 and thick cytochrome oxidase stripes of area 18 in the squirrel monkey. J Neurosci 7: 3371–3377Google Scholar
  31. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH (1987b) Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J Neurosci 7: 3416–3468Google Scholar
  32. Megaw ED (1972) Direction and extent uncertainty in step-input tracking. J Motor Behav 3: 171–186Google Scholar
  33. Miller J (1982) Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. J Exp Psychol (Hum Percept Perform) 8: 273–296Google Scholar
  34. Ottes FP, Van Gisbergen AM, Eggermont JJ (1984) Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: two different modes. Vision Res 24: 1169–1179Google Scholar
  35. Ottes FP, Van Gisbergen AM, Eggermont JJ (1985) Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system. Vision Res 25: 849–862Google Scholar
  36. Pachella RG (1974) The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In: Kantowitz B (ed) Human information processing. Erlbaum, Hillside, New Jersey, pp 41–82Google Scholar
  37. Poulton EC (1981) Human manual control. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, Sect 1. The nervous system, Vol 2. Motor control. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1337–1389Google Scholar
  38. Rosenbaum DA (1980) Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol (General) 109: 444–474Google Scholar
  39. Schouten JF, Bekker JAM (1967) Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychol 27: 143–153Google Scholar
  40. Sperling G, Dosher BA (1986) Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and performance, Vol I. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Stelmach GE, Goggin NL, Garcia-Colera A (1987) Movement specification time with age. Exp Aging Res 13: 39–46Google Scholar
  42. van Asten WNJC, Gielen CCAM, Winkel MEM (1988) The effect of isoluminant and isochromatic stimuli on latency and amplitude of saccades. Vision Res 28: 827–840Google Scholar
  43. van Sonderen JF, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1988) Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location. Exp Brain Res 71: 320–328Google Scholar
  44. Welford AT (1980) Reaction times. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Zelasnik HN (1981) The effects of force and direction uncertainty on choice reaction time in an isometric force production task. J Motor Behav 13: 18–32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Favilla
    • 1
  • W. Hening
    • 1
  • C. Ghez
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations