Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 618–624 | Cite as

In vitro dark adaptation and preservation of electrical light responses in the retina from bovine eyes

  • N. Ryba
  • R. Uhl
Article

Summary

A method is described which allows the in vitro dark adaptation of rod photoreceptors from cattle eyes, enucleated under ambient light in the slaughterhouse. Without in vitro dark adaptation these eyes are light adapted and cannot be used for certain delicate biochemical studies and for an electrophysiological characterisation of rod responses. The method is very simple and yields large amounts of dark adapted retinal material, allowing experiments that require bulk amounts of photoreceptor cells. The only source of dark adapted photoreceptors so far have been retinae from dark adapted laboratory animals, which had to be killed and processed under infrared light. Eye cups were opened under red light as soon as possible after their enucleation. Their vitreous humor was removed and their retina thoroughly rinsed with ringer's. Then the eye cup was placed in a moist, light-tight box, where dark adaptation took place. Photoreceptors could thus be kept alive for more than 24 h without showing signs of deterioration. Humidity and free access of oxygen to the retina were the only prerequisites for their survival. The physiological intactness of the photoreceptors and their degree of dark adaptation was demonstrated by measuring mass receptor potentials (ERGs). A simple device is described which can be used for the electrophysiological characterisation of these eyes.

Key words

In vitro dark adaptation Bovine retina Electroretinogram (ERG) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cone RA (1963) Quantum relations of the rat electroretinogram. J Gen Physiol 46: 1267–1286Google Scholar
  2. Dowling JE, Ripps H (1972) Adaptation in skate photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 60: 698–719Google Scholar
  3. Granit R (1955) Receptors and sensory perception. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  4. Hagins WA, Penn RD, Yoshikami S (1970) Dark current and photocurrent in retinal rods. Biophys J 10: 380–412Google Scholar
  5. Leibovic KN, Dowling UJE, Kim YY (1987) Background and bleaching equivalence in steady state adaptation of vertebrate rods. J Neurosci 7: 1056–1063Google Scholar
  6. Sillman RJ, Ito H, Tomita T (1969) Studies on the mass receptor potential of isolated frog retina. I. General properties of the response. Vision Res 9: 1435–1442Google Scholar
  7. Uhl R, Meyer B, Desel H (1984) A polychromatic flash photolysis apparatus (PFPA). J Biochem Biophys Methods 10: 35–48Google Scholar
  8. Uhl R, Desel H, Ryba N, Wagner R (1987) Simple and rapid procedure for the isolation of intact bovine rod outer segments (ROS). J Biochem Biophys Methods 14: 127–138Google Scholar
  9. Wagner R, Ryba N, Uhl R (1987) The amplified P-Signal, an extremely photosensitive light scattering signal from rod outer segments, which is not affected by preactivation of phosphodiesterase with Gα-GTP-γ-S. FEBS Lett 221: 253–259Google Scholar
  10. Wagner R, Ryba N, Uhl R (1988) Subsecond turnover of transducin GTPase in bovine rod outer segments. FEBS Lett 234: 44–48Google Scholar
  11. Wagner R, Ryba N, Uhl R (1988) Rapid transducin deactivation in intact stacks of bovine rod outer segment disks as studied by light scattering techniques. FEBS Lett 235: 103–108Google Scholar
  12. Wagner R, Ryba N, Uhl R (1988) Calcium regulates the rate of rhodopsin disactivation and the primary amplification step in visual transduction. FEBS Lett (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Ryba
    • 1
  • R. Uhl
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische ChemieGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations