Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 463–470 | Cite as

Selective listening modifies activity of the human auditory cortex

  • R. Hari
  • M. Hämäläinen
  • E. Kaukoranta
  • J. Mäkelä
  • S. L. Joutsiniemi
  • J. Tiihonen
Article

Summary

We have studied the effect of selective listening on the neuromagnetic evoked activity of the human auditory cortex. In the word categorization experiment the stimuli were 5-letter words, each beginning with /k/. Half of them were targets, i.e., names of animals or plants, and half other meaningful Finnish words. In the duration discrimination experiment equiprobable tones of 425 ms (targets) or 600 ms duration were presented. In both experiments the interstimulus interval (ISI) was 2.3 s and the stimuli of the two classes were presented randomly. Subjects either ignored the stimuli (reading condition) or counted the number of targets (listening condition). The magnetic field over the head was measured with a 7-channel 1st-order SQUID-gradiometer. The stimuli evoked a transient response followed by a sustained field. The transient response did not differ between the two conditions but the sustained field was significantly larger in the listening than reading condition; the increase began 120–200 ms after stimulus onset and continued for several hundred milliseconds. The equivalent source locations of both transient and sustained responses agreed with activation of the supratemporal auditory cortex. In the dichotic listening experiment 25-ms square-wave stimuli were presented randomly and equiprobably either to the left or to the right ear at an ISI of 0.8–1 s, either alone or in presence of a speech masker. Counting the stimuli of either ear resulted in differences between responses to relevant and irrelevant sounds. The difference began 140–150 ms after stimulus onset and peaked at 200–240 ms. During monaural speech masking, N100m was larger for attended than ignored stimuli. The results suggest that neural mechanisms underlying direction of attention include modification of the activity of the auditory cortex and that the mechanisms are similar for words and tones.

Key words

Auditory cortex Attention Magnetoencephalography Speech sounds Evoked responses Processing negativity Man 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alho K, Töttölä K, Reinikainen K, Sams M, Näätänen R (1987) Brain mechanisms of selective listening reflected by eventrelated potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68: 458–470Google Scholar
  2. Arthur DL, Flynn ER (1987) The effect of auditory selective attention on event-related magnetic fields of the human brain. 6th Internat Conf on Biomagnetism, Tokyo, (Abstract) pp 42–43Google Scholar
  3. Benson DA, Hienz RD (1978) Single-unit activity in the auditory cortex of monkeys selectively attending left vs. right ear stimuli. Brain Res 159: 307–320Google Scholar
  4. Creutzfeldt OD, Ojemann GA, Lettich E (1987) Single neuron activity in the right and left human temporal lobe during listening and speaking. In: Engel J, Ojemann GA, Lüders HO, Williamson PD (eds) Fundamental mechanisms of human brain function. Raven Press, New York, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  5. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K (1981) Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex: influence of stimulus intensity. Scand Audiol 10: 203–207Google Scholar
  6. Hari R, Ilmoniemi R (1986) Cerebral magnetic fields. CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 14: 93–126Google Scholar
  7. Hari R, Pelizzone M, Mäkelä JP, Hällström J, Leinonen L, Lounasmaa OV (1987) Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on-and off-sets of noise bursts. Audiology 26: 31–43Google Scholar
  8. Karjalainen M, Laine U, Toivonen R (1980) Aids for the handicapped based on “SYNTE 2” speech synthesizer. Proc IEEE Internat Conf on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 3: 851–854Google Scholar
  9. Kaukoranta E, Hari R, Lounasmaa OV (1987) Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants. Exp Brain Res 69: 19–23Google Scholar
  10. Kaufman L, Williamson S (1987) Recent developments in neuromagnetism. In: Barber C, Blum T (eds) Evoked potentials, III. Butterworths, Boston London, pp 110–113Google Scholar
  11. Knuutila J, Ahlfors S, Ahonen A, Hällström J, Kajola M, Lounasmaa OV (1987) Large-area low-noise seven-channel dc SQUID magnetometer for brain research. Rev Sci Instrum 58: 2145–2156Google Scholar
  12. Lovrich D, Novick B, Vaughan HG Jr (1988) Topographic analysis of auditory event-related potentials associated with acoustic and semantic processing. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71: 40–54Google Scholar
  13. Näätänen R (1982) Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 92: 605–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Näätänen R, Michie PT (1979) Early selective attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol Psychol 8: 81–136Google Scholar
  15. Okita T, Konishi K, Inamori R (1983) Attention-related negative brain potential for speech words and pure tones. Biol Psychol 16: 29–47Google Scholar
  16. Skinner JE, Yingling CD (1977) Central gating mechanisms that regulate event-related potentials and behavior: a neural model for attention. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Attention, voluntary contraction and event-related cerebral potentials. (Prog Clin Neurophysiol, Vol 1). Karger, Basel, pp 30–69Google Scholar
  17. Schwent VL, Hillyard SA, Galambos R (1976) Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. II. Effects of signal intensity and masking noise. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 40: 615–622Google Scholar
  18. Williamson S, Kaufman L (1981) Biomagnetism. J Magn Magn Mat 22: 129–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Hari
    • 1
  • M. Hämäläinen
    • 1
  • E. Kaukoranta
    • 1
  • J. Mäkelä
    • 1
  • S. L. Joutsiniemi
    • 1
  • J. Tiihonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Low Temperature LaboratoryHelsinki University of TechnologyEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations