Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 67, Issue 3, pp 460–468 | Cite as

Prefrontal unit activity during a delayed oculomotor task in the monkey

  • J. P. Joseph
  • P. Barone
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

  1. 1.

    Unit activity was recorded in the prefrontal cortex of Rhesus monkeys during performance of a delay task with two motor components, an ocular saccade and an arm movement, following a complex pattern of auditory and visual stimuli. A special feature of the paradigm was that onsets of the different sensory stimuli, orienting saccade and arm movement were dissociated in time at predetermined time intervals. 216 task-related units were recorded. Discussion of the data focuses on two groups of cells the activity of which is modified by the saccade: the signal-related presaccadic tonic cells and the post-saccadic tonic cells.

     
  2. 2.

    Activity of signal-related pre-saccadic tonic cells was initiated with the onset of peripheral stimuli, visual and/or auditory, and terminated with an orienting saccade. Spatial selectivity was a feature of most units. They seemed to encode the region of space cued by the stimulus.

     
  3. 3.

    Many units were visually responsive. Activation of these depended both upon retinal locus of the stimulus and the requirement they imposed on subsequent behavior. Termination of their activity demanded foveation of some visual targets, not necessarily the one which had initiated their response.

     
  4. 4.

    The majority of these signal-related pre-saccadic tonic cells responded to onset of auditory stimuli. The termination of tonic activity in these cells with foveation of the region in space from which the signal originated suggests a spatial memory process that is no longer used when the visual fixation response can signal equivalent spatial information.

     
  5. 5.

    Post-saccadic tonic cells were activated as the animals fixated a target; spatial selectivity was a feature of most of these. We suggest that this group of cells are part of the system which encodes the location of a target only if it is the goal of a visually guided movement.

     
  6. 6.

    A substantial proportion (20–30%) of signal-related tonic cells and post-saccadic tonic cells were activated differentially by use of one arm versus the other. These cells appeared to be more directly involved in motor preparation.

     

Key words

Delayed task Prefrontal cortex Unit Monkey 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruce CJ, Goldberg ME (1985) Primate frontal eye fields: single neurons discharging before saccades. J Neurophysiol 53: 603–635Google Scholar
  2. Fuster JM (1980) The prefrontal cortex. Raven, New York, pp 1–209Google Scholar
  3. Fuster JM (1981) Prefrontal cortex in motor control. In: Brooks VB (ed) Handbook of physiology, Section 1, Vol II. Am Physiol Soc Washington DC, pp 1149–1178Google Scholar
  4. Fuster JM (1973) Unit activity in prefrontal cortex during delayed response performance: neural correlates of transient memory. J Neurophysiol 36: 61–78Google Scholar
  5. Fuster JM (1985) The prefrontal cortex, mediator of cross-temporal contingencies. Human Neurobiol 4: 169–179Google Scholar
  6. Jacobson CF (1935) Functions of the frontal association area in primates. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 33: 558–569Google Scholar
  7. Jacobson CF, Nissen HV (1937) Studies of cerebral function in primates. IV. The effects of frontal lobe lesions on the delayed alternation habit in monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 23: 101–112Google Scholar
  8. Kojima S, Goldman-Rakic PS (1984) Functional analysis of spatially discriminative neurons in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey. Brain Res 291: 229–240Google Scholar
  9. Komatsu H (1982) Prefrontal unit activity during a color discrimination task with go and no-go responses in the monkey. Brain Res 244: 269–277Google Scholar
  10. Kubota K, Funahashi S (1982) Direction-specific activities of dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons during visual tracking. J Neurophysiol 47: 362–376Google Scholar
  11. Kubota K, Niki H (1971) Prefrontal cortical unit activity and delayed alternation performance in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 34: 337–347Google Scholar
  12. Kubota K, Iwamoto T, Suzuki H (1974) Visuokinetic activities of primate prefrontal neurons during delayed response performance. J Neurophysiol 37: 1197–1211Google Scholar
  13. Kubota K, Tunoike M, Mikami A (1980) Neuronal activity in the monkey dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a discrimination task with delay. Brain Res 183: 29–42Google Scholar
  14. Motter BC, Mountcastle VB (1981) The functional properties of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: foveal sparing and opponent vector organization. J Neurosci 1: 3–26Google Scholar
  15. Niki H (1974) Differential activity of prefrontal units during right and left delayed response trials. Brain Res 70: 346–349Google Scholar
  16. Sakai M (1974) Prefrontal unit activity during visually guided lever pressing reaction in the monkey. Brain Res 81: 297–309Google Scholar
  17. Susuki H, Azuma M (1977) Prefrontal neuronal activity during gazing at a light spot in the monkey. Brain Res 126: 497–508Google Scholar
  18. Watanabe M (1981) Prefrontal unit activity during delayed conditional discriminations in the monkey. Brain Res 225: 51–65Google Scholar
  19. Weinrich M, Wise SP (1982) The premotor cortex of the monkey. J Neurosci 2: 1329–1345PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Joseph
    • 1
  • P. Barone
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Neuropsychologie ExpérimentaleINSERM Unité 94BronFrance

Personalised recommendations