Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 108–122 | Cite as

EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip

I. Contribution of 15 finger muscles to isometric force
  • Marc A. Maier
  • Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond
Original Paper

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) activity was examined in six normal subjects, producing low isometric forces between thumb and index finger in a visually guided step-tracking task. Target forces ranged between 0.5 and 3.0 N. EMG activity of all 15 muscles acting on thumb or index finger was screened with simultaneous recordings of up to 8 muscles. Linear regression was applied to quantify the EMG activity as a function of force. The intrinsic muscles and the long flexors of the index finger had a tight relation to force, as indicated by the high correlation coefficient, as did the adductor and short flexor of the thumb. In contrast, the long extensors of the index finger did not show force-related activity. The other muscles, including the long flexor and extensor of the thumb, had varying,on average moderate, correlations to force. The slope of the regression lines, a measure for the amount of EMG modulation with increasing force, revealed the same trends. Thus the majority of the intrinsic muscles were as closely related to force as the long flexors, suggesting a more important role in production of low isometric forces in the grip than previously believed, perhaps even a primary role. Systematic interindividual differences were rarely observed. Analysis of the trialby-trial variability of EMG activity revealed that for most muscles the observed scatter was produced by varying background activity and was not a random fluctuation of relative increases in activity from one force level to the next.

Key words

Hand Isometric force Precision grip Coactivation EMG Human 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basmajian JV, DeLuca CJ (1985) Muscles alive. Their functions revealed by electromyography. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein N (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Boivin G, Wadsworth GE, Landsmeer JMF, Long C (1969) Electromyographic kinesiology of the hand: muscles driving the index finger. Arch Phys Med Rehab 50:17–26Google Scholar
  4. Chao EYS, Opgrande JD, Axmear FE (1976) Three-dimensional force analysis of finger joints in selected isometric hand functions. J Biomech 9:387–396Google Scholar
  5. Chao EYS, An K-N, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL (1989) Biomechanics of the hand. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  6. Clamann HP, Broecker MS (1979) Relation between force and fatiguability of red and pale skeletal muscles in man. Am J Phys Med 58:70–85Google Scholar
  7. Close JR, Kidd CC (1969) The functions of the muscles of the thumb, the index and the long fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 (8):1601–1620Google Scholar
  8. Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1987) Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of a rapid grasp. J Neurophysiol 57:1498–1510Google Scholar
  9. Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1988) Grip force adjustments evoked by load force perturbation of a grasped object. J Neurophysiol 60:1513–1522Google Scholar
  10. Cooney WP III, Chao YS (1977) Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:27–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Delagi EF, Peretto A (1980) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer (the limbs). Thomas, Springfield, IllGoogle Scholar
  12. Edin BB, Westling G, Johansson RS (1992) Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. J Physiol (Lond) 450:547–564Google Scholar
  13. Forrest WJ, Basmajian JV (1965) Functions of human thenar and hypothenar muscles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 47:1585–1594Google Scholar
  14. Johansson RS, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564Google Scholar
  15. Johansson RS, Westling G (1988) Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res 71:59–71Google Scholar
  16. Kendall FP, McCreary EK (1983) Muscles testing and function. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  17. Ketchum LD, Thompson D, Pocock GS, Wallingford D (1978) A clinical study of forces generated by the intrinsic muscles of the index finger and the extrinsic flexor and extensor muscles of the hand. J Hand Surg 3:571–578Google Scholar
  18. Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1993) Neural and biomechanical specializations of human thumb muscles revealed by matching weights and grasping objects. J Physiol (Lond) 472:537–556Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence JH, De Luca CJ (1983) Myoelectric signal vs force relationship in different human muscles. J Appl Physiol 54:1653–1659Google Scholar
  20. Long C (1968) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:973–984Google Scholar
  21. Long C, Conrad PW, Hall EA, Furler SL (1970) Intrinsic-extrinsic muscle control of the hand in power grip and precision handling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:853–867Google Scholar
  22. Macpherson JM (1991) How flexible are muscle synergies? In: Humphrey DR, Freund H-J (ed) Motor control: concepts and issues. Wiley, Chichester, pp 33–47Google Scholar
  23. Maier MA, Hepp-Reymond M-C, Meyer M (1990) EMG coactivation patterns and isometric grip force in human (abstract). Eur J Neurosci [Suppl] 3:65Google Scholar
  24. Maier MA, Hepp-Reymond, M-C, Meyer M (1991) EMG coactivation patterns in precision grip: timing and spectral analysis (abstract). Eur J Neurosci [Suppl] 4:97Google Scholar
  25. Maier MA, Hepp-Reymond M-C (1995) EMG activation patterns during force production in precision grip. II. Muscular synergies in the spatial and temporal domain. Exp Brain Res 103:123–136Google Scholar
  26. Matheson AB, Sinclair DC, Skene WG (1970) The range and power of ulnar and radial deviation of the fingers. J Anat 107:439–458Google Scholar
  27. Muir RB (1985) Small hand muscles in precision-grip: a corticospinal prerogative? Exp Brain Res 10:155–174Google Scholar
  28. Muir RB, Lemon RN (1983) Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip. Brain Res 261:312–316Google Scholar
  29. Ranney D, Wells R (1988) Lumbrical muscle function as revealed by a new and physiological approach. Anat Rec 222:110–114Google Scholar
  30. Romanes GJ (1981) Cunningham's textbook of anatomy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Rufener EA, Hepp-Reymond M-C (1988) Muscle coactivation patterns in the precision grip. Adv Biosci 70:169–172Google Scholar
  32. Smith AM (1981) The coactivation of antagonist muscles. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 59:733–747Google Scholar
  33. Smith AM, Bourbonnais D (1981) Neuronal activity in cerebellar cortex related to control of prehensile force. J Neurophysiol 45:286–303Google Scholar
  34. Stack HG (1962) Muscle function in the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 44:899–909Google Scholar
  35. Weathersby HT, Sutton LR, Krusen UL (1963) The kinesiology of uscles of the thumb: an electromyographic study. Arch Phys Med 44:321–326Google Scholar
  36. Woods JJ, Bigland-Ritchie B (1983) Linear and nonlinear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. Am J Phys Med 62:287–299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc A. Maier
    • 1
  • Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond
    • 1
  1. 1.Brain Research InstituteUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations