A regional climate model for the western United States
A numerical approach to modeling climate on a regional scale is developed whereby large-scale weather systems are simulated with a global climate model (GCM) and the GCM output is used to provide the boundary conditions needed for high-resolution mesoscale model simulations over the region of interest. In our example, we use the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) community climate model (CCM1) and the Pennsylvania State University (PSU)/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 4 (MM4) to apply this approach over the western United States (U.S.). The topography, as resolved by the 500-km mesh of the CCM1, is necessarily highly distorted, but with the 60-km mesh of the MM4 the major mountain ranges are distinguished. To obtain adequate and consistent representations of surface climate, we use the same radiation and land surface treatments in both models, the latter being the recently developed Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS). Our analysis emphasizes the simulation at four CCM1 points surrounding Yucca Mountain, NV, because of the need to determine its climatology prior to certification as a high-level nuclear waste repository.
We simulate global climate for three years with CCM1/BATS and describe the resulting January surface climatology over the western U.S. The details of the precipitation patterns are unrealistic because of the smooth topography. Selecting five January CCM1 storms that occur over the western U.S. with a total duration of 20 days for simulation with the MM4, we demonstrate that the mesoscale model provides much improved wintertime precipitation patterns. The storms in MM4 are individually much more realistic than those in CCM1. A simple averaging procedure that infers a mean January rainfall climatology calculated from the 20 days of MM4 simulation is much closer to the observed than is the CCM1 climatology. The soil moisture and subsurface drainage simulated over 3–5 day integration periods of MM4, however, remain strongly dependent on the initial CCM1 soil moisture and thus are less realistic than the rainfall. Adequate simulation of surface soil water may require integrations of the mesoscale model over time periods.
KeywordsGlobal Climate Model Mesoscale Model Community Climate Model Nuclear Waste Repository Surface Soil Water
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anthes, R. A., Hsie, E.-Y., and Kuo, Y.-H.: 1987, Description of the Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model Version 4 (MM4). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-282+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 66 pp.Google Scholar
- Barron, E. J.: 1987, ‘Nuclear Waste Disposal: A Climate Problem? - An Editorial’, Climatic Change 10, 107–109.Google Scholar
- Bolin, B., Döös, B. R., Jäger, J., and Warrick, R. A. (eds.): 1986, ‘The Greenhouse Effect, Climatic Change, and Ecosystems’, in B. Bolin, B. R. Döös, J. Jäger, and R. A. Warrick, (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, Scope 29, 541 pp.Google Scholar
- Brown, G. E.: 1987, ‘U.S. Nuclear Waste Policy: Flawed but Feasible’, Environment 29 (8), 6–7.Google Scholar
- Carter, L. J.: 1987, ‘Siting the Nuclear Waste Repository. Last Stand at Yucca Mountain’, Environment 29 (8), 8–13.Google Scholar
- Chang, A. T. C.: 1986, ‘Nimbus-7 SMMR Snow Cover Data, Snowwatch 1985’, Glaciol. Data Rep. World Data Cent. A. for Glaciol., Boulder, CO GD-18, 181–187.Google Scholar
- Craig, R. G.: 1988, ‘Evaluating the Risk of Climate Change to Nuclear Waste Disposal’, Mathematical Geology 20 (5), 567–588.Google Scholar
- Dickinson, R. E.: 1984, ‘Modeling Evapotranspiration for Three-dimensional Global Climate Models’, Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity 5, 58–72.Google Scholar
- Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., Kennedy, P. J., and Wilson, M. F.: 1986, Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) for the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-275+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 69 pp.Google Scholar
- Errico, R. M. and Baumhefner, D. P.: 1987, ‘Predictability Experiments Using a High-resolution Limited-area Model’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 488–504.Google Scholar
- Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S., Ruedy, R., and Russell, G.: 1988, ‘Global Climate Changes as Forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies Three-Dimensional Model’, J. Geophys. Res. 93 (D8), 9341–9364.Google Scholar
- Kiehl, J. T., Wolski, R. J., Brieglieb, B. P., and Ramanathan, V: 1987, Documentation of Radiation and Cloud Routines in the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1), NCAR Technical Note NCAR/ TN-288+IA, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration): 1974, Climates of the States, Vol. II - Western States, Water Information Center, 975 pp.Google Scholar
- Revelle, R. R. and Waggoner, P. E.: 1983, Effects of a carbon Dioxide-Induced Climatic Change on Water Supplies in the Western United States, Changing Climate, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. 496 pp.Google Scholar
- Shea, D. J.: 1986, Climatological Atlas: 1950–1979 NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-269+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 193 pp.Google Scholar
- Williamson, D. L., Kiehl, J. T., Ramanathan, V., Dickinson, R. E., and Hack, J. J.: 1987, Description of NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-285+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 112 pp.Google Scholar