Advertisement

Solar Physics

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 175–183 | Cite as

Essential features of the 11-year solar cycle

  • M. N. Gnevyshev
Article

Abstract

Investigation of sunspots, coronal lines intensity, flares and other solar and geophysical data have confirmed the fact that the 11-year cycle consists of two events (maxima) having different features.

During the first maximum (it coincides in time with the maximum of the Wolf numbers) the solar activity increases in all heliographic latitudes but it is maximal in latitude 25° in each hemisphere. The far UV radiation and number of small spots, flares and geomagnetic disturbances with sudden commencements and without 27-day recurrences are maximum at this time.

During the second maximum, which appears 2–3 years after the first one, the activity is maximal in latitudes ± 10°. At this time the biggest spots, big flares, aurora and geomagnetic disturbances with the gradual commencements and long series of 27-day recurrences appear.

The variations of averaged 5303 and 6374 Å coronal line intensities may be interpreted as an increase of coronal density and temperature during the first maximum and a sharp decrease of density and temperature rise during the second one. The temperature during the second maximum is higher than that during the first one.

The distribution of activity on time-latitude diagrams (so-called ‘butterflies’) is a result of superposition of two random distributions corresponding to the two maxima mentioned above.

Keywords

Flare Solar Activity Solar Cycle Geophysical Data Small Spot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antalová A. and Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1965, Publ. Czech. Acad. Sci. Astr. Inst. 51, 47.Google Scholar
  2. Bhargava, B. N. and Jacob, A.: 1974, Ann. Geophys. 30, 487.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, G. M.: 1974, Nature 251, 592.Google Scholar
  4. Cuperman, S. and Sternlieb, A.: 1972, Solar Phys. 25, 493.Google Scholar
  5. Filisetti, O., Lovera, G., Oldeno, C. and Tedde, P. G.: 1974, Lettre al Nuovo Cimento II, 29.Google Scholar
  6. Gentili di Guseppe, M., Hagon, M., Leroy, J. L., Roseti, I. and Trellis, M.: 1966, Ann. Astrophys. 29, 43.Google Scholar
  7. Gleissberg, W. and Damboldt, Th.: 1971, J. Brit. Astron. Assoc. 81, 270.Google Scholar
  8. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1963a, Astron. Zh. 40, 401.Google Scholar
  9. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1963b, XIII Gen. Assembly of Int. Union Geod. and Geophys. Berkeley, Calif. Abstr. of papers, 5, 232.Google Scholar
  10. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Sazonov, B. I.: 1964, Astron. Zh. 41, 937.Google Scholar
  11. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Antalová, A.: 1965, Astron. Zh. 42, 253.Google Scholar
  12. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1965a, Astron. Zh. 42, 488.Google Scholar
  13. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1965b, Monatsber. Deut. Akad. Wiss. 7, 128.Google Scholar
  14. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1965c, Results of Observations According to Program of I.G.Y. ‘Nauka’, Moskva, 99.Google Scholar
  15. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Ohl, A. I.: 1965, Astron. Zh. 42, 992.Google Scholar
  16. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Křivský, L.: 1966, Astron. Zh. 43, 385.Google Scholar
  17. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1966, Soviet Phys. Uspekhi 90, 291.Google Scholar
  18. Gnevyshev, M. N.: 1967, Solar Phys. 1, 107.Google Scholar
  19. Gnevyshev, M. N. and Chistjakov, V. F.: 1968, Astron. Zh. 45, 1029.Google Scholar
  20. Hakura, Y.: 1974, Solar. Phys. 39, 493.Google Scholar
  21. Kalinkov, M.: 1966, Soviet Astron. Circular, No. 466, 5.Google Scholar
  22. Kangas, J. and Raychandhuri, P.: 1973, Astrophys. Space Sci. 21, 3.Google Scholar
  23. Kassinsky, V. V.: 1973, Soln. Dannye No. 2, 78.Google Scholar
  24. Kopecký, M.: 1958, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 9, 34.Google Scholar
  25. Kopecký, M. and Kuklin, G. V.: 1966, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 20, 22.Google Scholar
  26. Kopecký, M. and Kuklin, G. V.: 1971, Invest. on Geomagn. Aeron. and Solar Phys. Irkutsk, 2, 167.Google Scholar
  27. Kopecký, M.: 1973, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 24, 113.Google Scholar
  28. Kopecký, M. and Kotrč, P.: 1974, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 25, 171.Google Scholar
  29. Kuklin, G. V.: 1971, Soln. Dannye No. 2, 75.Google Scholar
  30. Leroy, J. L. and Trellis, M.: 1974a, Astron. Astrophys. 35, 283.Google Scholar
  31. Leroy, J. L. and Trellis, M.: 1947b, Astron. Astrophys. 35, 289.Google Scholar
  32. Lucci, N., Parisi, M., and Villoresi, G.: 1973, Solar Phys. 33, 505.Google Scholar
  33. Lucci, N., Parisi, M., and Villoresi, G.: 1974, J. Geophys. Res. 79, 659.Google Scholar
  34. Miroshnichenko, L. I.: 1973, Priroda (Russian), No. 10, 10.Google Scholar
  35. Ohl, A. I.: 1974, High-Latitude Geophysical Phenomena, Leningrad, Nauka, 7.Google Scholar
  36. Papagiannis, M. D., Zerefos, C. S., and Reparis, C. C.: 1973, Solar Activity and Related Interplanetary and Terrestrial Phenomena, Berlin, 74.Google Scholar
  37. Pathak, P. N.: 1972, Solar Phys. 25, 489.Google Scholar
  38. Pokorný, Z.: 1973, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech. 24, 107.Google Scholar
  39. Sekurai Kunitomo: 1967, Spec. Contrib. Geophys. Inst. Kyoto Univ. No. 7, I.Google Scholar
  40. Scott Smith, T.: 1968, Nature 219, 357.Google Scholar
  41. Szymanski, W.: 1973, Post. Astron. 21, 145.Google Scholar
  42. Wadu, M. and Kudo, S.: 1967, Rept. Ionosph. Space Res. in Japan, 21, 45.Google Scholar
  43. Wilcox, J. M.: 1973, Comments Astrophys. Space Phys. 5, 75.Google Scholar
  44. Yoshimura, H.: 1971, Solar Phys. 18, 417.Google Scholar
  45. Zerefos, C. S., Mantia, H. T., and Reparis, C. C.: 1973, Preprint, Athens Nat. Hellanic Res. Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Gnevyshev
    • 1
  1. 1.The Kislovodsk Station of the Pulkovo ObservatoryKislovodskU.S.S.R.

Personalised recommendations