Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 585–597 | Cite as

Cooperative neural processes involved in stereoscopic acuity

  • G. Westheimer
Articles

Summary

Results of psychophysical experiments are reported showing that synchrony, appropriate relative placement, and absence of standing disparity are important conditions to be met by members of a target configuration if they are to participate in the cooperative neural processes leading to the best disparity discrimination. Consecutive binocular presentation of the members of a stereo target decreases stereoacuity by a factor of about 10, and a step disparity displacement of a single line target needs to be larger still to be detected as a depth stimulus. A standing disparity of even one minute of arc at least doubles the disparity discrimination threshold. It is postulated that a differencing mechanism operates on the depth signal of individual features; the temporal and spatial optima of target presentation for stereoscopic acuity outline the character of the concerned operations.

Key words

Stereoacuity Disparity detection Neural difference discrimination Binocular vision 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barlow, H.B., Blakemore, C., Pettigrew, J.D.: The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 193, 327–342 (1967)Google Scholar
  2. Burns, B.D., Pritchard, R.M.: Cortical conditions for fused binocular vision. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 197, 149–171 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. Butler, T.W., Westheimer, G.: Interference with stereoscopic acuity: spatial, temporal and disparity tuning. Vision Res. 18, 1387–1392 (1978)Google Scholar
  4. Foley, J.M., Tyler, C.W.: Effect of stimulus duration on stereo and vernier displacement thresholds. Percept. Psychophys. 20, 125–128 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. Heydt, R. von der, Adorjani, C., Hänny, P., Baumgartner, G.: Disparity sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 31, 523–545 (1978)Google Scholar
  6. Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Cells sensitive to binocular depth in area 18 of the macaque monkey cortex. Nature 225, 41–42 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Nelson, J.I.: Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision. J. Theor. Biol. 49, 1–88 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Pettigrew, J.D., Nikara, T., Bishop, P.O.: Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 391–410 (1968)Google Scholar
  9. Poggio, G.F., Fischer, B.: Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 1392–1405 (1977)Google Scholar
  10. Regan, D., Beverly, K.I.: Some dynamic features of depth perception. Vision Res. 13, 2369–2379 (1973)Google Scholar
  11. Westheimer, G., Hauske, G.: Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity. Vision Res. 15, 1137–1141 (1975)Google Scholar
  12. Westheimer, G., McKee, S.P.: Stereoscopic acuity for moving retinal images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68, 450–455 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. Westheimer, G., McKee, S.P.: What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis? Invest. Ophtalmol. 18, 614–621 (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Westheimer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology-AnatomyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations